Member Info for NicName

"Probably see more shorts now."

Well, it is now officially summer.

Have you considered averaging down Dosand?

Member since 29th Mar 2026, 291 posts in last 30 Days. Any on target I wonder?

If you say so, James. Keep a tight hold on that bag.

Whatever you say, James. Have a new 'bag for life'.

Tut, none of that matters Gheko - Laura bought in on a punt and is now trying to ramp the **** out of this. Fund a mental eh?

" Well he would say that, wouldn't he? "

He repeatedly posts it so he can use his alter egos to 'recommend' his post. Just another attempt to milk the gullible.

It's bull, of course, as there are no analysts currently covering FUM. It stems from some company sponsored note which dates back over a year and has long been superseded by reality. One may sensibly discount both it and the scribe.

" LOOKING like mms know whats coming "

So do you Undervaluedtoday, but you won't admit it so you attempt to ramp instead, then use your alter-egos to 'recommend' your nonsense posts. All rather shabby.

S/p still not reflecting the likely outcome in the housing market.

" The truth is he's been saying exactly the same thing for a year or so, proclaiming 'sub-1p by the end of the month!' and he still hasn't called it right! "

But you have to accept he's been a lot closer to the mark than you've ever been Colic ! ;-)

" Thanks Undervaluedtoday — how did you contact them (e.g. phone, email etc), and would you mind sharing any proof or details? I would like to follow up myself and it would help to reference your contact. "

He's a promotional poster. He just made it up!

Tuesday 17th, St. Patrick's Day.

Wednesday 18th, Muppets Day.

Good Lord (or not)! Sir Robert McAlpine, to whom one might guess you attempt to imply, shuffled off this mortal coil in 1934, or perhaps his grandson, Robert Alistair McAlpine, who departed on 2014? Beware of duppies with "insider knowledge"... ;-)

Valueinvesting.io

Well, that's a website to be ignored then - computer generated nonsense data, just what people need to mislead them. Nine analysts my hat (or 'ass' as they might say over the pond)! Who can be naive enough to believe such tosh? Not forgetting the target - it's hard to reckon which is the most absurd!

The nature of that post speaks for itself... unscrupulous.

"undervaluedtoday": Member Since 5th Mar 2026 - agitant or bagholder?

"Stranger danger"

A reference to Afzal Valli has to be a notable major 'red flag'. Who would do that?

Dosand: I've 'mentioned my doubts' (to put it lightly) over FUM for many years. Look what has happened, surely no more 'substantiation' is needed at this point. Did you not do any research?

Is it because you think 'things' are built on BS it's your 'job' to perpetuate that activity? One which can only prosper by the hoodwinking a larger contingent of 'greater fools' than those perpetrating. Is that your desired modus operandi, "who cares"?

To the contrary, I do have an idea where this share could be in six months.

Dosand: Only for those who would rather not face facts. BTW, I note you haven't been able to offer anything to substantiate your earlier assertions. Ref: your post 21 Feb 2026 16:32. Were you just being creative?

AI_R: No analyst has maintained a "strong buy consensus" or a target price of 30p for FUM in February 2026. The assertion you make was already dismissed as without merit many times, the last time on 21 Feb 2026 06:41. I'll quote that for you below.

"The sole 12 month 30p price target for FUM was published more than 12 months ago and that was within a client (FUM) sponsored (paid for) note. As it is a) time expired and b) the client has already demonstrated the projections were dramatically incorrect, what possible value has it now? The answer is simply none whatsoever."

By continually spouting the same old nonsense about a "30p analyst target" you and others doing likewise are making yourselves look particularly foolish, deceitful and unscrupulous.

Komakino: Thank you for the reference within FUM's FAQs. Haleon or Coopers aren't named as being involved there and, as far as I'm aware, FUM have not offered anything to clarify or support their FAQ comment. (It all looks 'a bit casually vague' to me, but that's just my personal view...)

Let's see if Doesanddonts will offer anything to assist in supporting his claims.

Dosand: "that data is out their & you know it"

Well, I have looked but I haven't had any luck finding it, which is why I asked you to be kind enough to quote the details (at least in part as a locator) or provide links, please.

For the avoidance of doubt I looked for: "Haleon did a trial with 3k people with ED & got the exact same results as FUM with a 60% succes, as did coopers!" as your post 21 Feb 2026 16:32.

Surely you can simply offer something in evidence to support it?