Member Info for NicName

Hope, you are allowing your emotions to overcome reason and sense.

" there was no obligation for him to make that stament in predicting his opinion"

Of course there was! He is surrounded by supporting evidence.

"CEO’s lie all the time on aim or did you not know that? "

So you endorse that and consider it a precedent?

P.S. I am not 'your boy', thank you.

" ceo should be ashamed of himself putting an RNS out like that! "

Would you have him lie instead?

Disappointment beckons.

Revolution has revolved but the Pitcher is still spinning.

Https://find-and-update.company-information.service.gov.uk/company/06744840/filing-history/MzQzODE1NjU1MGFkaXF6a2N4/document?format=pdf&download=0

There will now be a brief intermission whilst we attempt to expunge the company history.

Perhaps the SP plan is load Az. with debt and then flog it off to Saga...

150k - if they were rematerialised I guess someone might be willing to exchange a few beans but it's a trivial amount in the grand scheme of things.

Https://archive.ph/vzlqu

What level of holding do you have to get rid off StayinAlive?

This is like a game of poker... where every player is bluffing.

Reggie, please at least make the effort to do a little research. Nightcap's origins are a SPAC. Read and consider the Nightcap RNS slowly, assiduously, fully. Ignore the spin.

Banbury, I'm fed up trying to help you only to find your unreceptive critical nonsensical conceited responses and interjections, inventive unwarranted accusations and vindictive personal comments on every occasion, even when I'm clearly addressing someone other than you. Please 'keep your fingers firmly stuck in your ears', pay no attention to anything I write and go about your business. Thank you.

Reggie,

You may have been "being rhetorical" but you might understand that Nightcap is much about raising money.

Banbury,

The subject line is NIGHTCAP. The o/p was about NIGHTCAP. My reply was ref. NIGHTCAP.

Keep up you say???

Banbury,

1. I was replying to ReggieT

2. You interjected: "It certainly won't go bust which you predicted." - Where? Please cite your case.

A little research and you may be able to work that one out. Maybe start with the long term share price chart and work back to the origins.

Not a brilliant piece of reporting where MK thinks trading in the shares is currently suspended.

Ahh, rather par for the course, can't see wood for trees - paying attention to the analogy but missing the point. ;-)

People threw money at this as a thematic proposition without considering why. Background research, nah...

As the red flags waved they waved back.

Not "nothing happening" but a clean up operation, as one might with a nasty spillage in the kitchen where the evidence has to be removed before the other half gets home.

£450k funding raise request, for director's continued remuneration, lunch and other benefits.

Interestingly: "On 11 March 2024, 44% of the Company's share capital was traded in an off-market transaction at a price of 0.3036 pence, which is the Subscription Price."