Member Info for NicName

More like it just demonstrates that people take a blinkered view and herd principles apply.

That's the spin. The truth comes later. It isn't as pretty.

"When Haleon stock the new 8 pack into stores it will have double the revenue impact for FUM of the original launch stock up volumes."

Year 5: What is wrong with the above statement?

" Haleon know the stats" Yes, and FUM have given a steer on that.

"Sell 5,000,000 boxes worldwide, 2,000,000 it won't work for." Even if that were an accurate reflection, that's 2m that won't repeat order. Ballpark reality is it's nearest 80% than 40%.

"Haleon real world experience shows consumer demand for larger pack sizes." In which case the change in sales in pack volume will be indicative of the number of consumers who find a reliable benefit.

Why would 8 pack value pack be an attractive proposition when reviews indicate that a 4 pack doesn't provide any satisfactory result.

Rouge, It's not sarcasm, it's a matter of common sense. That you can't read the Bloomberg article doesn't really matter, it's clear from the original link that the ship is not being sold for $230m as the o/p asserted, which makes the rest of the o/p's comment a nonsense.

As an aside, should you be interested to read the full BB briefing you will find it archived (I'm not sure a link can be posted on this platform, but let me try: https://archive.ph/ZFp1S )

" Carnival sold this 26 year old ship for $230m and it's also half the size of one of our ships. Our entire market cap is less than the value of this crusty old ship. "

I always thought it was prudent to properly read and digest articles in the news. Helps to prevent making foolish errors of judgement, regurgitating nonsense and, you know, that kind of thing...

Good Lord!

Hi folks, I see the s/p has been rising recently - how much gold are these guys producing now or is it that they are just mining the ore for the time being?

Not until you've sold...

Given the Interim Results one might think 'Laura' would be better placed splashing £1000 elsewhere... (the talent already passed the 'exit' look more attractive than those few left on the dance floor!)

" Net bank debt (excluding PIK loan) is £19.4 million at 3 March 2025. "

One should be wary not to misread and/or conflate the matter of M&A with disappointing product take-up, logically they stand in opposition.

" Expect take-over shortly. "

Dream on...

"My purchase at 16:09 of 3,399 is also showing as a sell. ...can anyone explain why purchases would be showing as sells?"

Because someone else chose to fulfil your order at below the mid-price (bid/ask spread) at that time. That is to say they were 'keener' to sell the stock rather than hold it, to anyone prepared to make what they considered a reasonable offer according to the invitation price they provided.

You may draw your own conclusions as to the reason.

Dosand.., As I said, up to you. I prefer not to let "mood" influence my investment perspectives.

Market doesn't seem that impressed with ChatGPT analysis...

[Re: 3 Feb 2025 15:20]

Dosand..., I'm simply asking you to support your claims, the statements that you posted - if they are valid you should have no difficulty in doing that. Comments like "go & find the evidence yourself" only suggest you are trying to use excuses to evade evidencing your submissions and by doing so you implant a lasting doubt as to their validity and your credibility.

Up to you. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

"Let’s remember that both Haleon & Cooper did their own in-house independent tests"

Did they? Did they evidence anything? Did they publish?

"It obviously works..."

How's that investment premise looking so far?

"Perfect time to scoop another shovel of, and sit back and wait......."

OK, you 'scoop another shovel of' whilst I sit back and wait. :-)

"...and that you need to use it several times before it is effective."

Given it is not a drug, it contains no active ingredient and is the outcome of a placebo trial, there is something you should ask yourself about that suggestion, and that is, simply, why?

Were you to believe that sticking your member in a can of baked beans was beneficial to achieving a vibrant and enduring erection why would you expect the need to do so on several occasions before you became satiated?

Is it not more likely that, in finding baked beans somewhat of a disappointment the first time around, you might look for some alternative to try in the hope of a better result, perhaps a can of mushy peas for example?