RE: RRR next door: SXG issues another ANN, Fri, 6.9.246 Sep 2024 13:49
Part II:
MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS OF RRR: I do NOT know how much they know or DONT know? We, on this forum are talking about SXG and Sunday Creek especially last nights rise of SXG on ASX and the interview that followed. IF, the major shareholders consisting of a few people dont follow SXG closely, then they may not know the potential prize of listing, be it via a shell etc. Of course, there is RISK but the risk is reduced by the fact that KILMORE & KILMORE WEST had HISTORIC GOLD MINES just as how SUNDAY CREEK @SXG was drilled from the historic gold mine of Apollo, RISING SUN and Christina, all stated in black & white in last night's RNS of SXG and earlier = RE-DISCOVERY ie DRILL DEEPER than the VICTORIANS could reach due to lack of tech to reach depth then in Victorian days.
OFFER FOR RRR 100% KILMORE [RNS Aug 2024]: I go by convention and that IF, it did not meet the MINIMUM THRESHOLD , the Nomad would not have allowed it to be RNS' so prominently by way of the secondary header. So, let us suppose, that a minimum was offered and that will be £3MILLION for 100%. Why £3m. That is the DEAL M & A value of Pow SELLING 49.9% of RRAL Oz to RRR. This still means that RRR will have to PAY POW the full amount of £1.5m +. So, say, just to add the usual premium, 10% low ball was added taking it to some £3.1m. RRR BOARD DID NOT RECOMMEND THE OFFER, NOR DID THEY ACCEPT THE OFFER OR REJECT IT. We, shareholders dont know what is going on in talks with major shareholders but suffice to say, it is POSITIVE that NO RRR RNS has come out to state a DECISION on the OFFER or shell NDA signed. I have to assume then, from logic and reason based on this thesis supposition, the major shareholders being investment mgr etc are not laymen who know nothing about M & A fair value and DECISION TREE.
What about the rest of RRR? Ah, that is one of financials isnt it? My view only is that in the end, it will be DOWN to the MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS of RRR who are professionals in real life eg investment mgr, deriivitive trader etc. There are only a few of them and they have just enough votes to have a "voice" in matters RRR and STRATEGIC DIRECTION. The "real" tussle will come when it comes to VOTING [real and fomal] & the issue will be "STRATEGIC DIRECTION". Now, up to RRR to see how they will lead into next year provided it remains still "in play".
So, as I said, CAVEAT is decide accordingly and DONT BLAME anyone as it is set out in a thesis, but like ALL thesis, it must be proven eventually or not. News, 6 Sep 2024 @1:42pm. DYOR. NIA.