Member Info for news

G_G_G I have called up WSBN@Red Setter RNS, 13 Dec 2022 at https://x.com/WishboneGoldPlc/status/1602586670574043137 Quote: " MINERALISATION shows the same SIMILARITIES to the TELFER system, 13km to the NE. HIGHER grade assays & WIDE INTERCEPTS received so far include 14.1m at 1 g/t gold & 0.2% copper FROM 266m in Hole WRSDD008. The holes inc 6,8.9 & 11.

Fig 4 , Page 6/12 is the STAR CORE and the marking on the core & description: " Fig 4: MINERALISED CORE WRSDD0008 276.25m with ____1.37 g/t au GOLD & 0.72 % cu COPPER." 276 is also marked on the core itself to show this was at 276m depth when found.

Fig 5: "Mineralised core 06 at 166.5m to 166.8m @ 0.27g/t au gold & 2.27% cu copper." Fig 6: " Core showing au at 6.44 g/t au Gold & cu 0.7% copper."

Fig 3: " Mineralised quart-carbonate sulphide VEIN 06 , 395-396m at 5.29 g/t au Gold & 0.06% copper."

WHY "STAR" CORE @WSBN, RED SETTER @13 DEC 2022 RNS?. Firstly SP Angel's Initiation Note shows this core at the top of the page prominently. Link: https://wishbonegold.com/investors/analyst-research/ Top of page: "SP Angel-Wishbone Gold, 6 July 2023.

STAR CORE @GREATLAND GOLD , Havieron, Hole 5: The Hole 5 STAR is shown by a Geologist hired by Sprotts to go to the Greatland core shed then before their report. Link: https://x.com/stocksandrocks/status/1075249296017043457 dated 19 Dec 2025 from William Langley with thanks. Langley tweete: "Most exciting gold DISCOVERY I have seen in a long time. Was lucky enough to tour Greatland Gold new warehouse & see 1st hand the Havieron drill core from recent ann. 1 word: Amazing." Data: Hole 5 Havieron @Greatland Gold: " Intersected 275m of mineralisation at 4.77 g/t GOLD & 0.61% cu COPPER [5.75 g/t gold equivalent].

Comment: The WSBN star core shown also by SP Angel above [well polished up] & WSBN vs Havieron star core. After tea and munchies of salad, I will show the WSBN @2025 [Aug to-current] Hole 1 core pictures and the official markings. Note what WSBN stated as above of high grade cores @2022 which is surface and their star core vs Havieron star core which looks akin to.

G_G_G Since you asked me, I will provide you the courtesy of a reply. You are right to ask that pointed question of comparing Hole 1 VISUALS @ Red Setter vs Havieron. This will be the opening gambit to look for including geological observations given by the Geo to understand the COMPOSITE whole picture VERSUS the actual assay results. [2] In the same vein, what does Hole 2 @WSBN Red Setter going to come out at ie assays? STRATEGY: Chairman Poulden was a former barrister & he also worked in Strategy at a Management Consultancy from recall. Herein, it is how he will inform the market that will be important. I am sure you know what I mean.

To answer the question directly, I have to provide links to PROVE the official markings & wording on the @WSBN Red Setter Hole 1 core in 2025 vs cores in 2022 surface drilling vs Hole 5 Havieron core. Also, what DL said. I am aware that on this forum others have taken their stance & I do wonder why they remain? It is known as a CONVICTION call. Since I did not anticipate posting, I did not take the links down so I have to make another search. Thank you. This was the same LEGENDARY QUESTION at GREATLAND GOLD @HAVIERON in those days & then I managed to crack it and that is attested to by those on that forum given it was all stated in the RNS's.

Oh, I am also waiting to see HOW HEAD OF ADMIN @ London South East is going to deal with the current dictum for folks NOT to post on the WSBN main forum given this site set up as a stock forum for folks to post and for which they derive advertising revenue. If folks cannot post [chat rules on this site state not to stop anyone posting] , then this site's traffic will come to a crawl. No site , be it on Hotcopper Australia or in America does anyone dare say to everyone NOT TO POST, take a rest from posting for health and so forth = STOP ALL POSTING now. 8.10.25.

London South East Chat Rules are very clear. In accordance to these rules on this site which is similar to other UK share sites, the most striking chat rule is:

"It is NOT possible for us to fully MONITOR ALL CONTENT all of the time but where we have received notice of any content that is potentially MISLEADING, untrue...or potentially in breach, then we will review such content, decide to remove it from this site and ACT ACCORDINGLY."

ADVFN for example per AI states that "False information" cannot be posted under the UK regulation.

For Clarity: It is for this reason why my posts are long as I cite sources, references for people to check and that it is from data so that I comply with the rules. Many like short posts but in order to do that, then one may be posting what is a DEFINITIVE statement which has no professional basis or foundation. How can one post : X co has a Tier 1 deposit? How can anyone without authority say that? But if the co stated that in an Annual Report of the potential, one can quote from an official RNS especially, from an Annual Report. So, I follow BEST AND ETHICAL PRACTICE.

On the main board, folks tell others to not post citing health and LoL ,calls it an essay when it is just citations as is seen commonly even on Wikipedia ie at the end of entries, there is a citation and reference given as is all academic papers that run into hundreds and thousands of tomes. Certainly, in a A Level Law Paper, merely stating Question 1: B will fail or pass in his legal assertions of his defence will elicit a FAIL. Why? What is the legal reason. So, folks are discussing deposits etc without factual reference/s.

Does one get exhausted from posting a few posts that are supported by data? In the office, will any employer deem posting posts of at max 10 words a day be deemed to be sufficient especially in an investment house? I think not. My clarification. News, 8 Oct 2025.

Oh, the latest on the WSBN main board is 1 chap telling everyone not to post because wait for the OFFICIAL RNS from the co and NOT TO DISCUSS kinda of thing. THE STOCK MARKET IS FORWARD LOOKING and every investment house has ANALSYSTS analysing past data to extrapolate the potential of any co that the co is looking at. By the time the official news is out, the Investment house would have been left behind, hence every fund has a RESEARCH DEPT to SUPPORT FUND MANAGERS and they work long hours as norm, not rest all day as is being advised. LoL. Pardon typo errors as there is predictive text error often.

Today, is Wed 8 Oct 2025 and Wishbone @Red Setter, Paterson , Western Australia is continuing to drill Hole 2 to 1,000m depth. Yesterday, Wishbone on twitter showed a picture of the drilling crew working at night. So, a lot of drilling to do given the £4m raise will drill 5,000m at Red Setter.

Time will tell and PROVE many things.

I think it is now appropriate to MOVE ON and the reason for my posting is to inform that I have NOT been banished form this site but have chosen to take a break as folks say they dont understand my post even though it was taken verbatim from Proactive Investors of the results of the earlier surface drilling at Red Setter and how this is now carried into the coming drilling of the surface again via perhaps later drilling etc.

So, it was appropriate the revisit what was said then about the drilling results of the surface expression at Red Setter. Thank you. Wed, 8 Oct 2025 @5:50pm. I WONT be posting at this WSBN forum since it is not understood per folks today on the main WSBN forum. How? Alistair Ford is a Mining Analyst and his take was interesting on Red Setter as a whole and its potential. He was RIGHT as Andrew Forrest is now a large shareholder of Greatland Gold @ Havieron.

G_G_G The regulator does not like too many updates and companies follow convention. Therefore, even Greatland never released part by part RNS's at every hole nor tons of pictures on Twitter. The convention is that they will release an RNS when it hits their TARGET DEPTH of 1,000m. Co's will continue to drill further IF they find there is still mineralisation and stop only when mineralisation is weakening or no more mineralisation. That is why Wishbone released a picture that they are drilling deeper and deeper on 5 Oct 2025. Folks, just one tiny typo error and people jump at me - it took me an hour or so to go through the archives and when I posted it , all I get is angst. So, best to leave it to you folks then to get on. Thanks. Wed, 8 Oct 2025. It is close to tea and dinner time so one can make mistake as trying to rush.

Typo : WSBN RNS of 13 Dec 2022 and the Alistair Ford written article for Proactive Investors released on 23 Dec 2022 to review the 13 Dec 2022 assay results from Red Setter [surface drilling].

Dibs61: What is so hard to understand? I have recall an article by Alistair Ford, a Mining Analyst that reviewed the Wishbone Red Setter assays results from Red Setter released on 13 Dec 2025. As for eriesy62, yes, today is 8 Oct 2025 and that article as above dated Dec 2023 is still relevant to Wishbone Gold. How? In the Wishbone Gold 6 Oct 2025 RNS, the co revealed that they will be also DRILLING the more SURFACE expression of Red Setter which means a continuation of surface drilling as WELL which usually means depth to 500m. They will use the drill pad to reach the DEEPER and MORE SHALLOW parts but the RNS does NOT say what depth is the surface drilling they are targeting. What is so hard to understand when Alistair Ford is quoted by me?

Bezinio

Wishbone drilled Red Setter in the earlier years and on 13 Dec 2025, they released the drill assay results. On this forum in recent days, some folks stated that the results were NO GOOD and they lost money. That happened even at GREATLAND 's HAVIERON - as soon as the Hole 6-9 were released, the folks on the forum said its NO GOOD ie its not good enough for JV etc and perhaps taken to mean not economic enough as they deemed ONLY HOLE 5 to be good enough. Before the drill, folks expected grades of 5 g/t gold and higher even so expectations are so high that anything less , they go into potential meltdown. But OPERATING MINES per Colin Bird, Poulden etc is only 0.5 g/t gold grade. This is surface grade for open pittable. Whatever the results, its always no good in their eyes of ordinary folks. HISTORY SAYS DIFFERENT: Now Greatland's HAVIERON is classed as a TIER 1 DEPOSIT. So, ordinary folks have no idea it would appear of what would be good enough grades in COMPOSITE , not just 1 hole. Why? 1 hole does NOT EQUATE to a DEPOSIT isnt it? Same at Solgold, same at EEE and everywhere else - BUT INDUSTRY knows what is and what isnt?

Cebo-46 Yesterday, you posted that Greatland's Havieron Hole 1-4 was NOT COMMERICIAL, only Hole 5. But that is NOT fact given HOLE 1 was the DISCOVERY HOLE. The assays were released for Hole 1 and before that, VISUALS. Then, Hole 2-4 were drilled and the assays were released. Then, Hole 5 was the star hole and that was released on its own ie assay results. Then, Hole 6-9 were drilled and that was released as a batch. I was THERE BEFORE the drill stared. So, I have already posted from GREATLAND'S SITE on the history and that last assays came out in EARLY DEC 2018 and in Mar 2019 , the JV with Newcrest. THAT IS ALL HISTORICAL and FACTUAL. I also checked AI @Google to make sure and it stated that stating Hole 1-4 of Havieron is NOT CORRECT as GEOLOGY of the project is not hole by hole. IF ONLY HOLE 5 was ECONOMIC , then Newcrest would not have JV'ed in. IT IS THE MODELLING OF THE COMPOSITE of the deposit and that is done by Economic Geologists - MR RIO known as Mr Copper was hired and went onto the board and was the advisor.

As for putting things in the right order, it is in NOTE form. Having worked for Swiss-Germans, they speak like that.

Contd:

"As it stands, the central focus for GEOLOGISTS is a __________H U G E UNDERGROUND magnetic ANOMALY____at 3KM by multiples km deep, this anomaly is ------------F A R ----BIGGER ---THAN HAVEIERON. Bear in mind too that the Havieron anomaly has underpinned into several hundreds of millions of pounds. So far so good- PLENTY OF MINERALISATION to get to grips with, and PLENTY OF SIGNS MORE TO BE HAD. First though, there is a bit more data that needs to be fed into the MODEL FOR RED SETTER. But it is on RED SETTER that the SPOTLIGHT will inevitably fall.. And not only on the___H U G E ___ potential that is on offer geologically or because of its attractiveness LOCATION TO TELFER."

"There is now the POSSIBILITY OF RIVALRY between ANDREW FORREST....who is now the MAJOR SHAREHOLDER OF GREATLAND- and Newcrest may results in a LAND GRAB in the Pilbara. FORREST has DEEP ENOUGH pockets to MAKE GREATLAND INDEPENDENT of Newcrest and if he did so, it would change the whole dynamic of land VALUATION in the area- and possibly--PUT WISHBONE IN THE BIDDING WAR."

Comment: Well, didnt folks say WSBN Red Setter results that came out on 13 Dec 2025 was NO GOOD also , like at Greatland's Havieron. It is interesting that the WSBN 6 Oct 2025 EXPANSION DRILLING STATED THE SURFACE will also be targeting in this drilling program currently underway ---so SURFACE AND DEEPER DRILLING ---a REVISIT of 2023 & DEEPER DRILLING @2025. With Forrest's "help", indeed Greatland was able to buy via finance etc Telfer. DYOR. Wed, 8 Oct 2025.

"Wishbone Gold Red Setter beginning to show real promise."-Proactive Investors, Dec 23, 2022 written by ALISTAIR FORD, Mining Analyst . Quote: "Is there MINERALISATION there? YOU BET THERE IS. Among the best results from a set of results released on 13 Dec 2023 were ___14m at 1gm GOLD and 0,2% COPPER and 10m at 0.48g/t GOLD & 0.03% COPPER. Those results form a broader CONFIRMATION of the presence of Red Setter of a HYDROTHEMAL gold & copper system. The project sits in a PRIME location. Bearing in mind, that Newcrest is known to be on the LOOK-OUT for FEED for its increasingly UNDER-USED facility at TELFER. RED SETTER is EVEN NEARER to Telfer than HAVERION."

"It is NOT so easy to GET such PRIME LOCATION in PATERSON these days , _____BUT WSBN CHAIRMAN POULDEN MANAGED IT.__The project was originally ACQUIRED IN A BALLOT by a LOCAL, who then passed it to Poulden. Originally, not much was known about Red Setter's potential. But it quickly became APPARENT that the project had REAL & SIGNIFICANT POTENTIAL." Will continue part 2.

LInk: https://x.com/proactive_x/status/1606223599597240323

Interesting that £4m raise on 30 Sep 2025 was to expand drilling at Red Setter - 5,000m was contracted to drill to 700+m if needed. This means around __7.14 HOLES. This means that with the 2 Holes already done & in progress + 7.14holes = 9 H O L E S at Red Setter. HISTORY OF GREATLAND GOLD @HAVIERON: Hole 1-5 was Phase 1 and Hole 6-9 was Phase 2 = Total 9 holes [Hole 1 was the DISCOVERY HOLE & the best Hole was 5.]

Folks then said NOT good enough relating to 9 holes from Havieron @GGP with the last assays released in early Dec 2018. It went QUIET for 3 months and in Mar 2019 , Newcrest JV'ed in at $65m for the deal and GGP NEVER DRILLED AGAIN as they were no longer the OPERATOR. The deal stated that Newcrest would take it to PFS stage and Greatland to retain only 30%. WHY DID FOLKS GET IT WRONG? It is due to the fact that just 1 Hole will not make a project and that ALL the HOLES must be inputted into LEAP FROG to do the average grade and then to MODEL, hence months of negotiation and working etc.

Same here at WSBN & will folks get the wrong idea once assay results come out ? Why? Folks are expecting Greatland Havieron grades but the MODELLING DONE BY EXPERT GEOPHYSICS + MobileMT does not say so and Chairman Poulden at the £4m raise on 30 Sep 2025 stated that EG's work has "PROVEN TO BE HIGHLY ACCURATE." So, $36,000 what does the MODEL SAY other than "ANALOGUE TO TELFER" - and what sort of grades etc.

DL: "You seem to have no idea of how long it takes to CUT core & get ASSAYS back from the laboratories RIGHT NOW. I have some sampling

programmes in Oz that are taking 10-12 wks to get results. I am sure the lads are on the case. I dont run WSBN."- 3 hrs ago.

Q: "GRADES Mr Lenifas? Where are Hole 1 results? https://x.com/DavidLenigas

P.S. GMEvans95 said in his post depending on prices. Yes, GOLD price is US$4,000 per oz [Futures] and spot is just close to it and the higher the price of gold and copper, the LESS PRESSURE on the grades correspondingly.

In case anyone is interested, I looked at Wallal in Paterson BEFORE today's RNS. On 29 Sep 2025, they gave an update on Phase 1 driling and it said little ie NO VISUALS nor any geological observations etc depth breakdown etc or VISIBLE mineralisation etc. I was stunned to read that from DESKTOP work, they had to STOP at some 918.7 metres due to deteriorating downhole conditions and target depth was 1,200m BASEMENT [RNS 7 Oct 2025.] Here at WSBN

there has been extensive DETAILS in the Aug-Sep 2025 and Oct RNS's. So, I have personally TICKED everything now and waiting for assay results from Hole 1. So, just for discussion that WSBN has hired a lot of experts inc the firm that worked for Havieron as Geophysics @TerraSearch and now EG who also brought in Russell Mortimer who works for BHP, RIO, Anglo, Illuka etc as a specialist Geophysicist. Apex doing the drilling & exploration is also a specialist consultancy. So, lots of geo and I am sure GEO'S PRESENT AT ALS LAB PERTH having seen the cores at Red Setter CUT UP WILL HAVE SOME IDEA ON 2 SEP 2025. DL & co must be aware that the last time at Greatland there was Geo talk in Perth etc. So, everyone to take their OWN DECISION and hope for the best given WSBN RED SETTER AT 3.5KM X 500M ANOMALY AS POULDEN SAID IS 10X HAVEIRON [actual ore body 350-360m but kindly check]. DYOR. News, Tues, 7 Oct 2025.

G_G_G

WSBN RED SETTER HOLE 1: 152M Breccia pipe : V I S I B L E SULPHIDES inc chalcophyrite & pyrite [copper potential].

vs GREATLAND HAVIERON DISCOVERY HOLE 1: 121M of mineralisation @ 2.9g/t gold & 0.23 % copper FROM 497m.

vs TELFER Underground grade 1.3 g/t gold & 0.33% copper historically works out to 1.7-1.8 g/t gold EQUIVALENT depending on prices [Futs US$4k]

Note: No 1 is from Expert Geophysics Linkedin post which I addressed you with inc link to screen shot. Greatland Gold's Discovery Hole 1 is online.

And Telfer Underground is from Expert Geophysics link to GMEVANS 95. So, whilst Red Setter ended at 777m due to rods ran out, most important the hole ENDED IN MINERALISATION and DOWN HOLE DATA TAKEN to evidence this. So, Hole 1 Red Setter will beat the lenght of Havieron's discovery hole and Havieron grades are NOT expect per Poulden [Chairman] as he said Red Setter is an "ANALOGUE TO TELFER" which is the biggest mine in W.Australia per EG. Hole 2 is another day and that is quite known that drilling is still going on ie deeper to target depth 1,000m/ So, TELFER GRADES are THE BENCHMARK FOR WSBN RS.

"Wishbone about to Shock the Market."- Expert Geophysics @Linkedin [firm that WSBN hired to do the MobileMT that can scan to 1,000m + 3D Modelling].

Link: https://x.com/AfzalValli/status/1963195856628179366 dated 3 Sep 2025 [Afzal screen shot the post from Linkedin @Expert Geophysics with thanks.

Last line: "..porphyry system with potentially HUGE VALUE."

In the post written by Expert Geophysics entitled: "____WISHBONE GOLD PLC ABOUT TO SHOCK THE MARKET___, they had a link at the top of their post and it takes one to London South East site at https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/gmevans95/

Gmevans95 posted on 30 Aug 2025: " Telfer sits only 13-15km northeast, now run by Greatland Gold after its acquisition from Newmont.

Its ____ U N D E R G R O U N D g r a d e s average ___1. 3 g/t GOLD plus 0.33% COPPER historically works out to roughly 1.7-1.8 g/t gold EQUIVALENT depending on prices"

On 3 Sep 2025 Gmevans95 posted on this site @WSBN: "Great to see Expert Geophysics reference my post and reference over on their Linkedin page."

Comment: So, with DL, Consultant tweeting for the 1st time after Wishbone tweeted the picture of Red Setter working at night, it is possible we may get some sort of news hopefully as is the norm when they can start talking ie tweeting otherwise quiet until after the RNS is issued. I note 1 is not happy and this is like the days of Solgold and Greatland, wherein 1 was banned permanently from this site for the to do's everyday like two cats LoL, so one had to go ie the one starting it. So, kindly remember Sir, everyone has a right to post and if its is too ACADEMIC , kindly FILTER as the Head of Admin on this site said FILTER. Thanks. _____________REMEMBER THE ABOVE UNDERGROUND GRADES FROM TELFER IS THE ONE WE ARE WATCHING OUT FOR, not Havieron grades as Chairman Poulden said Expert Geophysics said WSBN Red Setter :"ANALOGUE TO TELFER". _____Otherwise it will be confusion on the release isnt it? Tues, 7 Oct 2025 @8:40pm. Everyone is NO longer on this site so nothing to complain about with stock mkt closed, shops closed, supermarkets closed and NO NEED TO READ THIS FORUM until tomorrow morning isnt it?

Link: https://x.com/DavidLenigas Tweeted at 7:07pm, Tues, 7 Oct 2025 Here's a chance to ask nicely if anyone has any questions.

"The Lamil Dome is NOT on the SAME STRUCTURAL corridor as the Red Setter prospect although they are both in Paterson, W.A. An article from Wishbone Gold distinguishes the two, noting the PRESENCE of DIFFERENT __MINERAL & FAULT SYSTEM.__ Structural Differences: Lamil Dome: LACKS the major North West-trending FAULTS and BRECCIA PIPES THAT ARE PRESENT AT RED SETTER. [2] Geology: Lamil Dome: A target for gold and copper hosted by the Lamil Group of the Yeneena supergroup vs WSBN Red Setter: MINERALISATION is associated with BRECCIATION & A STRONG MAGNETIC ANOMALY. It is also linked TO THE __TELFER STYLE & HAVIERON STYLE MINERALISATION__.

Summary: LAMIL VS WSBN RED SETTER: DISTINCT STRUCTURAL CORRIDORS: The two prospects are DISTINCT from each other , BOTH STRUCTUALLY.

AND THE MINERALS they contain. Exploration targets: Whilst both are exploration targets in the Paterson, the STRUCTURAL FEATURES that CONTROL MINERALISATION differ SIGNIFICANTLY.

GEOLOGICAL ANALOGS: Whilst initially considered similar to TELFER & to each other,__________FURTHER DRILLING & ANALYSIS REVEALED ___

structural DIFFERENCES including --------------- the A B S E N C E of a MAJOR fault system at LAMIL and BRECCIA PIPES AT LAMIL."

Source cited : " CO-FUNDED DRILLING REPORT , 29 Mar 2021 ["1: Bibliographic Data Sheet. Project Name: Lamil. Combined Reporting. University of North Carolina."

P.S. Havieron's hole was HOLE 1 as cited and the DISCOVERY HOLE. So, G_G_G, good to know your thoughts on this or anyone else as this is the work Chairman Poulden said was "proven to be highly accurate" at the 30 Sep 2025 WSBN RNS on the £4m raise. In case folks forgot, Chairman Poulden said Red Setter anomaly at 3.5km x 500m is "10x" larger than Havieron from recall since I gave source and ref days ago. Thanks. I think that is all to cover on. Tues, 7 Oct 2025 at 4.25pm. Those who dont want to know can FILTER as that is what Head of Admin on this site said.