Member Info for news

"Wishbone Gold Red Setter beginning to show real promise."-Proactive Investors, Dec 23, 2022 written by ALISTAIR FORD, Mining Analyst . Quote: "Is there MINERALISATION there? YOU BET THERE IS. Among the best results from a set of results released on 13 Dec 2023 were ___14m at 1gm GOLD and 0,2% COPPER and 10m at 0.48g/t GOLD & 0.03% COPPER. Those results form a broader CONFIRMATION of the presence of Red Setter of a HYDROTHEMAL gold & copper system. The project sits in a PRIME location. Bearing in mind, that Newcrest is known to be on the LOOK-OUT for FEED for its increasingly UNDER-USED facility at TELFER. RED SETTER is EVEN NEARER to Telfer than HAVERION."

"It is NOT so easy to GET such PRIME LOCATION in PATERSON these days , _____BUT WSBN CHAIRMAN POULDEN MANAGED IT.__The project was originally ACQUIRED IN A BALLOT by a LOCAL, who then passed it to Poulden. Originally, not much was known about Red Setter's potential. But it quickly became APPARENT that the project had REAL & SIGNIFICANT POTENTIAL." Will continue part 2.

LInk: https://x.com/proactive_x/status/1606223599597240323

Interesting that £4m raise on 30 Sep 2025 was to expand drilling at Red Setter - 5,000m was contracted to drill to 700+m if needed. This means around __7.14 HOLES. This means that with the 2 Holes already done & in progress + 7.14holes = 9 H O L E S at Red Setter. HISTORY OF GREATLAND GOLD @HAVIERON: Hole 1-5 was Phase 1 and Hole 6-9 was Phase 2 = Total 9 holes [Hole 1 was the DISCOVERY HOLE & the best Hole was 5.]

Folks then said NOT good enough relating to 9 holes from Havieron @GGP with the last assays released in early Dec 2018. It went QUIET for 3 months and in Mar 2019 , Newcrest JV'ed in at $65m for the deal and GGP NEVER DRILLED AGAIN as they were no longer the OPERATOR. The deal stated that Newcrest would take it to PFS stage and Greatland to retain only 30%. WHY DID FOLKS GET IT WRONG? It is due to the fact that just 1 Hole will not make a project and that ALL the HOLES must be inputted into LEAP FROG to do the average grade and then to MODEL, hence months of negotiation and working etc.

Same here at WSBN & will folks get the wrong idea once assay results come out ? Why? Folks are expecting Greatland Havieron grades but the MODELLING DONE BY EXPERT GEOPHYSICS + MobileMT does not say so and Chairman Poulden at the £4m raise on 30 Sep 2025 stated that EG's work has "PROVEN TO BE HIGHLY ACCURATE." So, $36,000 what does the MODEL SAY other than "ANALOGUE TO TELFER" - and what sort of grades etc.

DL: "You seem to have no idea of how long it takes to CUT core & get ASSAYS back from the laboratories RIGHT NOW. I have some sampling

programmes in Oz that are taking 10-12 wks to get results. I am sure the lads are on the case. I dont run WSBN."- 3 hrs ago.

Q: "GRADES Mr Lenifas? Where are Hole 1 results? https://x.com/DavidLenigas

P.S. GMEvans95 said in his post depending on prices. Yes, GOLD price is US$4,000 per oz [Futures] and spot is just close to it and the higher the price of gold and copper, the LESS PRESSURE on the grades correspondingly.

In case anyone is interested, I looked at Wallal in Paterson BEFORE today's RNS. On 29 Sep 2025, they gave an update on Phase 1 driling and it said little ie NO VISUALS nor any geological observations etc depth breakdown etc or VISIBLE mineralisation etc. I was stunned to read that from DESKTOP work, they had to STOP at some 918.7 metres due to deteriorating downhole conditions and target depth was 1,200m BASEMENT [RNS 7 Oct 2025.] Here at WSBN

there has been extensive DETAILS in the Aug-Sep 2025 and Oct RNS's. So, I have personally TICKED everything now and waiting for assay results from Hole 1. So, just for discussion that WSBN has hired a lot of experts inc the firm that worked for Havieron as Geophysics @TerraSearch and now EG who also brought in Russell Mortimer who works for BHP, RIO, Anglo, Illuka etc as a specialist Geophysicist. Apex doing the drilling & exploration is also a specialist consultancy. So, lots of geo and I am sure GEO'S PRESENT AT ALS LAB PERTH having seen the cores at Red Setter CUT UP WILL HAVE SOME IDEA ON 2 SEP 2025. DL & co must be aware that the last time at Greatland there was Geo talk in Perth etc. So, everyone to take their OWN DECISION and hope for the best given WSBN RED SETTER AT 3.5KM X 500M ANOMALY AS POULDEN SAID IS 10X HAVEIRON [actual ore body 350-360m but kindly check]. DYOR. News, Tues, 7 Oct 2025.

G_G_G

WSBN RED SETTER HOLE 1: 152M Breccia pipe : V I S I B L E SULPHIDES inc chalcophyrite & pyrite [copper potential].

vs GREATLAND HAVIERON DISCOVERY HOLE 1: 121M of mineralisation @ 2.9g/t gold & 0.23 % copper FROM 497m.

vs TELFER Underground grade 1.3 g/t gold & 0.33% copper historically works out to 1.7-1.8 g/t gold EQUIVALENT depending on prices [Futs US$4k]

Note: No 1 is from Expert Geophysics Linkedin post which I addressed you with inc link to screen shot. Greatland Gold's Discovery Hole 1 is online.

And Telfer Underground is from Expert Geophysics link to GMEVANS 95. So, whilst Red Setter ended at 777m due to rods ran out, most important the hole ENDED IN MINERALISATION and DOWN HOLE DATA TAKEN to evidence this. So, Hole 1 Red Setter will beat the lenght of Havieron's discovery hole and Havieron grades are NOT expect per Poulden [Chairman] as he said Red Setter is an "ANALOGUE TO TELFER" which is the biggest mine in W.Australia per EG. Hole 2 is another day and that is quite known that drilling is still going on ie deeper to target depth 1,000m/ So, TELFER GRADES are THE BENCHMARK FOR WSBN RS.

"Wishbone about to Shock the Market."- Expert Geophysics @Linkedin [firm that WSBN hired to do the MobileMT that can scan to 1,000m + 3D Modelling].

Link: https://x.com/AfzalValli/status/1963195856628179366 dated 3 Sep 2025 [Afzal screen shot the post from Linkedin @Expert Geophysics with thanks.

Last line: "..porphyry system with potentially HUGE VALUE."

In the post written by Expert Geophysics entitled: "____WISHBONE GOLD PLC ABOUT TO SHOCK THE MARKET___, they had a link at the top of their post and it takes one to London South East site at https://www.lse.co.uk/profiles/gmevans95/

Gmevans95 posted on 30 Aug 2025: " Telfer sits only 13-15km northeast, now run by Greatland Gold after its acquisition from Newmont.

Its ____ U N D E R G R O U N D g r a d e s average ___1. 3 g/t GOLD plus 0.33% COPPER historically works out to roughly 1.7-1.8 g/t gold EQUIVALENT depending on prices"

On 3 Sep 2025 Gmevans95 posted on this site @WSBN: "Great to see Expert Geophysics reference my post and reference over on their Linkedin page."

Comment: So, with DL, Consultant tweeting for the 1st time after Wishbone tweeted the picture of Red Setter working at night, it is possible we may get some sort of news hopefully as is the norm when they can start talking ie tweeting otherwise quiet until after the RNS is issued. I note 1 is not happy and this is like the days of Solgold and Greatland, wherein 1 was banned permanently from this site for the to do's everyday like two cats LoL, so one had to go ie the one starting it. So, kindly remember Sir, everyone has a right to post and if its is too ACADEMIC , kindly FILTER as the Head of Admin on this site said FILTER. Thanks. _____________REMEMBER THE ABOVE UNDERGROUND GRADES FROM TELFER IS THE ONE WE ARE WATCHING OUT FOR, not Havieron grades as Chairman Poulden said Expert Geophysics said WSBN Red Setter :"ANALOGUE TO TELFER". _____Otherwise it will be confusion on the release isnt it? Tues, 7 Oct 2025 @8:40pm. Everyone is NO longer on this site so nothing to complain about with stock mkt closed, shops closed, supermarkets closed and NO NEED TO READ THIS FORUM until tomorrow morning isnt it?

Link: https://x.com/DavidLenigas Tweeted at 7:07pm, Tues, 7 Oct 2025 Here's a chance to ask nicely if anyone has any questions.

"The Lamil Dome is NOT on the SAME STRUCTURAL corridor as the Red Setter prospect although they are both in Paterson, W.A. An article from Wishbone Gold distinguishes the two, noting the PRESENCE of DIFFERENT __MINERAL & FAULT SYSTEM.__ Structural Differences: Lamil Dome: LACKS the major North West-trending FAULTS and BRECCIA PIPES THAT ARE PRESENT AT RED SETTER. [2] Geology: Lamil Dome: A target for gold and copper hosted by the Lamil Group of the Yeneena supergroup vs WSBN Red Setter: MINERALISATION is associated with BRECCIATION & A STRONG MAGNETIC ANOMALY. It is also linked TO THE __TELFER STYLE & HAVIERON STYLE MINERALISATION__.

Summary: LAMIL VS WSBN RED SETTER: DISTINCT STRUCTURAL CORRIDORS: The two prospects are DISTINCT from each other , BOTH STRUCTUALLY.

AND THE MINERALS they contain. Exploration targets: Whilst both are exploration targets in the Paterson, the STRUCTURAL FEATURES that CONTROL MINERALISATION differ SIGNIFICANTLY.

GEOLOGICAL ANALOGS: Whilst initially considered similar to TELFER & to each other,__________FURTHER DRILLING & ANALYSIS REVEALED ___

structural DIFFERENCES including --------------- the A B S E N C E of a MAJOR fault system at LAMIL and BRECCIA PIPES AT LAMIL."

Source cited : " CO-FUNDED DRILLING REPORT , 29 Mar 2021 ["1: Bibliographic Data Sheet. Project Name: Lamil. Combined Reporting. University of North Carolina."

P.S. Havieron's hole was HOLE 1 as cited and the DISCOVERY HOLE. So, G_G_G, good to know your thoughts on this or anyone else as this is the work Chairman Poulden said was "proven to be highly accurate" at the 30 Sep 2025 WSBN RNS on the £4m raise. In case folks forgot, Chairman Poulden said Red Setter anomaly at 3.5km x 500m is "10x" larger than Havieron from recall since I gave source and ref days ago. Thanks. I think that is all to cover on. Tues, 7 Oct 2025 at 4.25pm. Those who dont want to know can FILTER as that is what Head of Admin on this site said.

G_G_G It is now 5pm and offices have closed and everyone is now home for tea and family time. So, a small discussion is in order & what this London South East forum was set up for. Expert Geophysics has posted on Linkedin that "Wishbone Gold Plc about to shock the market" & it was screen shot onto to Twitter. Link is: https://x.com/AfzalValli/status/1963195856628179366 dated 3 Sep 2025.

Quote: " In 2025, drilling results : BRECCIA PIPE D IS C O V E R Y! The initial drill hole delivered a BREAKTHRU: ____A 152M BRECCIA PIPE__set within a broader 257m zone of quart carbonate VEINING between 520m and 777m. V I S I B L E SULPHIDES, including pyrite and chalcopyrite suggests SIGNIFICANT COPPER potential. ____This strategic outcome VALIDATES MOBILEMT targeting and highlighting its effectiveness in pinpointing covered geo structures likely to host mineralisation."

"With THIS INITIAL SUCCESS, the team is now executing S T E P - O U T drilling to explore extensions of the breccia pipe to test whether it is an isolated target or _____PART OF A LARGER PORPHYRY SYSTEM with potentially HUGE VALUE."

Comment: WSBN Red Setter's Hole 1 @152m is going to be much longer than HAVIERON @121m [2.9 & 0.23%] FROM DEPTH 497m. That is the reason why Hole 2 was drilled 200m from Hole 1 to test CONTINUITY as described in layman's parlance but the term in geology is "continuity". I will also add that in the Expert GeoPhysics Linkedin post ie at the top, there is a LINK and it comes to this site where the TELFER SURFACE GRADES ARE CITED INCLUDING UNDERGROUND GRADES. So, folks bear this in mind as and when the grades come out for Hole 1 given Expert Geophysics told Chairman Poulden @WSBN that Red Setter is "ANALOGUE TO TELFER", hence Poulden explained years ago, it is not a HAVIERON.

LOTM-13

For the Avoidance of Doubt: I never called you any name - it is your own term. Why? Please look at my post carefully given I asked you WHERE IS THE SOURCE? On Hotcopper Australia, they state to kindly please let folks have the SOURCE to CHECK and you have given no source or link to check the 65 or something like that reading. I have cited HAVIERON @Greatland Gold and that they discovered it using J I M H A N N E S O N of Adelaide Mining Geophysics [refer to my post of 15:43 today, Tues 7 Oct 2025]. For Wishbone Gold, Chairman Poulden used TERRA SEARCH whom is said in an RNS that they logged several thousand metres for Havieron and they told him, Red Setter did NOT drill DEEP enough like Havieron [that will be Newcrest's historical drills a long time ago]. As a RC, I gave you the ________OPPORTUNITY OF GIVING US ALL READING A SOURCE ___for your readings and how reading of 65 is based on what sort of geo methodology and why it is THE ONLY CRITERIA vs _____2 GEOPHYSICAL FIRMS ADVISED WSBN CHAIRMAN POULDEN including the current EXPERT GEOPHYSICS who used RUSSELL MORTIMER, GEOPHYSICST'S who works for BHP, RIO TINTO and ANGLO AMERICAN + ILLUKA. Also, Apex Geoscience is doing the drilling and exploration so therefore a BEVY OF EXPERTS inc GEO'S [few] present to witness the cutting of the drill cores at ALS Perth Lab.

Therefore, it is NOT UNREASONABLE to ask for a source since you post at 15:20 today to G_G_G states 65% and 70% similarity. Also, on Hotcopper , they state that if anyone states they are an expert, then to provide the name. So, I am following convention isnt it? Why? Our investment in WSBN is based on the RNS's from this co [Aug-Sep-Oct 2025] and from their EXPERTS cited as above in WSBN's RNS's. So, if you say 65% & 70% and quote from different locations, then your work must be proofed for ALL TO SEE and then let others take THEIR DECISIONS based on WSBN's experts or your expertise? FAIR ISNT IT?

LOTM-13

You cite Lamil Dome and this is what is stated: " Reports from 2020 through 2022 by companies exploring the LAMIL Project in Paterson, W.A indicate varying DEPTH, with 1 report noting an intersection of mineralised reefs at _______175m-210 meters. KEY DRILLING AT LAMIL: EIS co-funded drilling: AIC Mines drilled several holes- the DEPTH of the cover ranged ____from 50m in the East to 190 meters on the western side of the dome. In Dec 2022, Encounter reported ______HIGH GRADE COPPER REEFS at DEPTHS OF 175M TO 210 M."

Comment: So, as Richard Poulden stated in the said interview with Proactive Investors [gave link before], THEIR GEOPHYSICS FIRM told him that like HAVIERON , they did not drill deep enough, same as Red Setter then @shallow drilling 2022. So, from FACTUAL DATA, Lamil never DRILLED the DEPTHS like TELFER AND HAVIERON TO 1,00M and beyond. As for readings where is the source: I will cited HAVIERON: Jim Hanneson of Adelaide Mining Geophysics developed the GEOPHYSICAL MODELING METHOD used to identify the MINERALIZED system at Havieron & Rames. Greatland used the info from wireline surveys to refine their geophysical models. SO, LAMIL IS NOT RELEVANT TO RED SETTER --------THERE HAS BEEN NO DEEPER DRILLING BEYOND 210M. FACTUAL: Havieron's mineralisation STARTS FROM APPROX ________420M AND ENDS AT 1,400M----. QED. Pls check & DYOR. Tues, 7 Oct 2025

See LOTM-13 at 14:21, Tues, 7 Oct 2025 stated:

"So by Mon night here they would be at 771m & by mid-night tonight they should be OVER 800m mark. ____IF they are __ STILL in MINERALISATION __at 1,000m [which would be next Tues night], I can see them carry on as DEEP as they can safely get with the rig ie at 1100m which would be another 3 days of drilling."

Comment: OPERATIVE WORD: "STILL IN MINERALSATION" AT 800M------>1,000m--->1100m. So, LOTM-13 acknowledges what I said is known geo convention, drill FURTHER IF , "still in mineralization " - down hole DATA must be taken before leaving ie readings etc? Off now. Tues, 7.10.25 DYOR.

David Lovell , Geologist was inducted into the the Hall of Fame and he said on his website, he only needs to see 1 hole. Lovell discovered Encondida that was the jewel of BHP's crown. But for Canadian rules, they specify 3 holes. If, WSBN were to have drilled a spacing of 50m average space out, then 5 holes would =250m in toto. But WSBN was probably confident of the Expert Geophysics 's MobileMMT so they stepped out from Hole 1 @200metres. So, for me personally, I would need to only see 2 holes because Hole 1 is not at the centre but Hole 2 is. That will be enough indications given I go on the Expert Geophysics 3D Model - if right, then by extension a continuity. How far one needs to see is up to each one but at different price points. Lovell was the finder Geo. ENCONDIDA: "Borehole POZO 6 in 1981 discovered the M A I N OREBODY - it hit _____52m ____ at 1.51% cu."

Sharebel: Since you addressed me, I will give you the courtesy of a reply. I have seen you around for many moons but NOT on the stocks I have invested in.

Hole 1 did stated in an RNS that it ended at 777m IN MINERALISATION didnt it? Now, WSBN Red Setter is at Hole 2 and last RNS, it was at 581m from recall and everyone says shortly 1,000m target depth HIT. Drilling convention is that IF, there is no more mineralisation they STOP and take DOWN HOLE DATA that must be recorded. So, a matter of grades isnt it? I dont see that Telfer is that demanding a grade and Poulden never said that Expert Geophysics said it was a Havieron. Hole 2 is 200m away from Hole 1 and that is a BIG STEP up so positive wont you say as it is not 50m whic appears not as demanding. ALL ON THIS FORUM ARE OVER 18 and everyone told the RISK- that is good enough isnt it? News, Tues, 7 Oct 2025.

IF, the ... are poor as postulated at 13:06 WHY then did Chairman Poulden state in a raise RNS of 30 Sep 2025 that the "prior analysis by Expert Geophysics

has P R O V E N to be H I G H L Y ACCURATE."? This was a statement in the raise RNS for £4m with Oak Securities. This is FACT.

So, all this about folks is not borne out because Oak Securities would need DOCUMENTATION to see and file for the basis of the large £4m raise. It is also obvious that it will be institutions and HNW that took the raise and it can be a BLIND basis for the lending? So, no P...here as said.

The pic shown by DL was dated 2 Sep 2025 and on the wall was "ALS LAB" with Ed Mead and other Geo's inspecting the cores from Red Setter and spraying water etc. I asked AI about ALS Lab and it said 6-8 wks. Dont forget that CORES CANNOT BE ANALYSED without cutting them and crushing so at 2 Sep 2025, it was the start of the analysis. So, whilst folks quote the earlier date, that would be the delivery etc isnt it given Red Setter is miles from Perth and by road 10-15 hrs at least. At Greatland Gold, same thing with folks asking day and night and fretting.

Remember Solgold? Then, Dr Rohlach was the Chief Geologist and 3D modelling was also done with no MMT etc then. Did it turn out accurate within a margin of error ? YOU BET IT DID - see the results of higher grade zone and lower grade zone as is common with porphyry's and even TELFER is the same and that is factual. So, everyone knows they dont have to be IN for the results and REAMS of posts and many have left - so no one said to stay etc. ALL HAVE LEFT anyway. So, staying In will be based on the FACTUAL RNS of the visuals and "STRONG ALTERATION HIT" per 25 Sep 2025 WSBN RNS isnt it -this is what the £4m lender has also seen before lending ie Oak Securities and I recall they will support further but do CHECK.

Ref: WSBN RNS 30 SEP 2025: " Red Setter Gold Dome Expansion with £4m raise." @7am.

"Richard Poulden commented: As previously announced the RESULTS of the CURRENT drill program at Red Setter Dome exploration site have been VERY PROMISING & the prior analysis by EXPERT GEOPHYSICS has P R O V E N to be HIGHLY A C C U R A T E."

Comment: This is the basis of the funds made available and per a Proactive Investors UK interview with Richard Poulden he explained RED SETTER vs TELFER vs Havieron and stated per Expert Geophysics MMT etc , WSBN's Red Setter is an "ANALOGUE TO TELFER". WSBN is using APEX GEO Consultants to do the exploration & drilling and prior to that TERRA SEARCH which a WSBN RNS stated that they did the "several thousands metres of logging "for Greatland's Havieron. Few Geo's were present at the cutting of WSBN Red Setter cores - a 2 Sep 2025 picture from DL, the Consultant to WSBN shows inspection of cores before cutting etc. In addition, Russell Mortimer, Geophysicist was in attendance in the comment section of the Expert Geophysics 3D modelling etc. PUNCHLINE: " Red Setter HITS strong alteration" on 25 Sep 2025 via WSBN RNS and 5 days later on 30 Sep 2025, a raise from Oak Securities and in the RNS, the partner of Oak said something like they are supportive if further to? [Kindly check].

The contract is to drill 5,000 metres and the RC rig can drill to 700+m. This means at least 7.14 HOLES. The objective stated is to drill both SHALLOW holes from @2023 and current @2025 drilling per above. Hole 2 which is still currently drilling is located 200 METRES from the 1st Hole at Red Setter.

Ref: "Hunting for the NEXT HAVIERON : The NEXT BILLION DOLLAR story."-ShareTalk, 4 Oct 2025 at https://www.share-talk.com/hunting-for-the-next-havieron-fdr-geo-rock-wsbn-rcr-ggp-the-next-billion-story-2-2/ Quote: "Grades & CONTINUITY"

Comment: Share Talk also stated as above Hole 1, WSBN Red Setter as __152m of continuous breccia within a 257m zone of veining & SULPHIDES."

So, Oak Securities arranged for £4m funding the expansion of said drilling on 30 Sep 2025 predicated upon the WSBN RNS dated 25 Sep 2025 before this of : "Drilling HITS s t r o n g ALTERATION at Red Setter." Clear isnt it that WSBN is on the PATH of drilling for ____CONTINUITY___ [Hole 2 is 200m from Hole 1 at Red Setter] . In the case of Greatland Gold at the time then, external experts wanted to see 350m of ___CONTINUITY___ [all done with 9 holes with last assays released in early Dec 2018 & good enough for a JV with Newcrest in Mar 2019. Hole 1 was the DISCOVERY HOLE AT HAVIERON at 121 METRES [2.9 & 0.23].

NOTE:

As I said Hole 2 @WSBN Red Setter , Paterson, Western Australia is 200m away from Hole 1 and that CONTINUITY must be proven ie step out.

In the case of Greatland Gold's Havieron, also Paterson, experts wanted to see AT LEAST 350m STEP OUT to __PROVE CONTINUITY___ of the mineralisation then. So, that is the reason for the RNS today ie prove continuity from to and from Hole 2's current drill. AND THE BIG SURPRISE from today's WSBN RNS was that the SHALLOWER MINERALISATION of the 2023@RED SETTER is also TARGETED = SHALLOW & DEEPER MINERALISATION.

To me, that is the ULTIMATE : Shallow previous @2023 mineralisation + @2023 deeper mineralisation isnt it? News, Monday, 6 October 10:15pm.

DYOR.

The meaning of above: "Wishbone's use of Reverse Circulation [RC] rig for pre-collars, in conjunction with its diamond drill rig, enhances its ability to target SHALLOWER copper-gold INTERCEPTS. RC rigs are more agile & better at generating a variety of drill ANGLES for these INITIAL holes, allowing the co to TEST A BROADER AREA from each drill pad. Once the RC rig reaches TARGET DEPTH-where the ORE BODY is expected----the diamond rig takes over. The diamond rig then drills a DIAMOND TAIL providing a precise, SOLID CORE sample for detailed geological analysis of the MINERALISED ROCK. The RC rig can be used to FOLLOW UP SHALLOWER INTERCEPTS previously IDENTIFIED.

This allows for a more TARGETED & RAPID exploration of NEAR SURFACE GOLD & COPPER which may NOT require diamond drilling. Having BOTH RIGS on site allows Wishbone to optimise its drilling. The co gets rapid and broad data from the RC holes, while collecting HIGH QUALITY CORE SAMPLES from the diamond TAILS for detailed analysis. WSBN can lower its overall exploration COSTS."

___________"Wishbone's strategy, combining RC & diamond rigs is designed to C O N F I R M __the ___ C O N T I N U I T Y__ of the DEPOSIT, including the MINERALISED zones found in Hole 2 by efficiently targeting both_______L A T E R A L & SHALLOWER mineralisation.

Mineralisation in Hole 2: Drilling at this hole intersected MULTIPLE zones of brecciation and ALTERATION WITH SULPHIDES starting around 520m. There are signs of mineralisation within domal folded hinge structure with zones of quartz-carbonate VEINING & SULPHIDES observed Down Hole. The hole reached 777m in the FIRST PHASE and INTERSECTED A BRECCIA PIPE OVER -------------A 152M INTERVAL------WITHIN A 257M zone containing quartz carbonate VEINING & sulphides of C H A L C O P Y R I T E & pyrite."

"Pre-collars for diamond tail: This speeds up drilling by handling UPPER SECTIONS of deeper holes. FOLLOW UP OF SHALLOWER MINERALISATION:

The co reported ------------ E X T E N S I V E SHALLOWER GOLD mineralization during the ----2023-- drill programs ____WITH INTERCEPTS ___S T A R T I N G

FROM 1 1 7 M down hole, The RC rig can efficiently test these SHALLOWER zones. "

The RC's rig ability to create MORE ANGLES allows the co to explore a BROADER AREA & follow potential L A T E R A L extensions of the mineralised zones identified."

"P R O V I N G CONTINUITY: The next step involves sinking a step out hole to the South West of the current Hole 2 targeting the SAME HORIZONS at depth of 5 5 0m to ASSESS the LATERAL EXTENT OF THE BRECCIA system.-------Allows for a more comprehensive & efficient exploration program to understand the EXTENT & C O N T I N U I T Y of the MINERALISATION @RED SETTER-------------INCLUDING THE DEEPER INTERCEPTS & POTENTIAL SHALLOWER EXTENTIONS."

Comment:Note the above especially those who said the previous 2023 drill for surface mineralisation was nada kinda of thing? Above from G.A.