RE: Re: news29 Apr 2024 16:45
Art123
Since you addressed your post to me, I will reply since there is a lot of missed info. [1] Pitfield, NO, I did NOT invest at the time of the copper period but upon 1st results of titanium which others were disappointed at. I understood the results. So, it was MULTIPLES as facts go for all invested. [2] POW: NO, I also recognised that the hope for theory, that the nickel formation to be found at the deeper parts of the formation were NOT Tier 1 hits and I exited upon much earlier long ago results. Again, I understand results. [3] Cascabel, NO, I invested upon and BEFORE drilling started based on Dr Rohlach's modelling and his tonnage came in but the grades vary in the high grade zone and the shell but all in, all good as norm. Again, when to multiples. [4] You didnt mention GGP as I was in, so LoL, you didnt follow me to look, again on 1st drill results. [5] TYM, in specific NO DRILLING DONE AT KONKOLA WEST? I gave a link to Research Gate wherein a STRATIGRAPHY drill was done and it was named as well with sample and it hit bornite, chalco & moly at the HIGHER Roan formation at around 750m. Now, TYM per their website stated they are going for LOWER ROAN which is shallower, hence why MULFULIRA , the Roan ref by Research Gate shows they hit copper at 133m, hence why both me and Torino want to know what they hit if any at the Lower Roan. Any co can hit the right project and if mineralisation extends to TYM licence is NOT understood at TYM Mukai from First Quantum/AFP and better, then we are on different song sheets ie geo data is part of the process. So, with that, I take my leave from replying further but best I replied. News, 29.4.24. Dont concentrate on me because it wont help the investment.