RE: RRR Australia, DRC, Kenya, FASO, Cote d'Ivoire etc: Poster Reputations27 May 2024 16:04
Specinvestor99
If you or anyone else is a shareholder of RRR, or intending to be, then it would be, why, COUNTER to self, IF the bull case did NOT exceed the Bear Case. For this reason, Financial Times 's Investor's Chronical evaluates co's on the basis of BULL CASE points and BEAR CASE points which provides what is termed a BALANCED view. At any time, the balance swings towards the bear case, then one put further evaluate and decide accordingly. No TWO person's evaluation will be the same. For those who DO NOT HOLD stock, it is easy to do a "critique" since they have NO holding. For this reason, I dont go round to all the forums to tell folks what the bear points are for the sake of it etc. I can NEVER be 100% sure that in ANY CO, there can be NO TURNAROUND. I dont poke my nose into other forums because there is a MORALITY ie people are invested and they should do RESEARCH & not the type many believe research is about. In my view only, BROKER notes from Investment Banks of Tier 1 quality oft provide the same type of balance as an IC analysis. I dont have to explain what OPTION MONEY is to Brits. If they dont know, then they should consult a Financial Consultant as the FCA states. NO, Helpful is NOT "AN INSIDER" to RRR. He does not meet that definition as he has no executive position in RRR. If anyone here has a lot of money and they can buy huge stakes in RRR and they have a hedge fund, they can telephone RRR to take a conference call after results if they oblige. AND, not to ask the type of questions some folks have been asking either. Listen to American Conference Calls with Analysts. You may chose to say, it is NOT but the definitive is not anyone's to define outside the official definition of , say "insider buys." In stocks, there are NO CHEER LEADERS. Why? Money is involved and cheer leaders are not appropriate nor are folks here pure "roompers" for as long as they provide a balanced view ie bear & bull. For roopers, they do NOT understand anything very indepth and so the usual lingo is , in tbe past, "get in", "booming" and such like. Those days are gone as I dont see much of that now. Hope that clarifies. As for Helpful, he provided "qualification" to what he said and that qualification must be taken into a/c, in the English language. Not editing. Got to run. Hence, why I said I wont post given its is too long drawn explaining what should be known if one has ever invested in stocks. The stock mkt has a very steep learning curve and those who have been long in it are now aware of the various risks to any stock & no one can guarantee anything given many stocks have disappeared even in the FTSE etc. Mon, 27.5.24 Public Hol-Stock Mkt Closed. As for MORALITY: people have money invested & one should take note - once said, twice said but saying everyday & for years? DYOR. DIA.