RE: Production uplift10 May 2021 16:15
muckle,
"you would think if a t/o was going to happen companies would've done their homework on serica and moved in when SP was in the 80p range..."
You would have thought .... although :
Firstly, BKR needed to be bedded in, staff 2P over and production efficiencies achieved etc etc.
Then the added complication of the licence for Rhum, WAS on a 12 month renewal ( subject to terms), SQZ have subsequently be able to extend this process considerably.
Also BP have to give the go ahead for the BKR sale if SQZ wanted to sell-on, so possible stumbling block.
Then you have the progressive PSA improvement from 40% to 100% over the 4 years. All about cashflow and ROI for potential acquirer, only need to wait another 7 months for full 100%.
Given our SP has remained static for almost 3 years due imo, to our not so friendly BoT, you could argue that SQZ given the uncertainties being removed, improved PSA, R3, Columbus and Eigg licences, is as good a value, if not better, than it was when sat at 80p/s .... still debt free and mountain of cash.
Herein lies the dilemma ..... Now, as we get closer to Jan 2022 the willingness to sell falls away sharply, conversely, so does the attractiveness of SQZ to an acquirer. You have to reach the sweet-spot for both buyer and seller, has to be something in it for both parties ( this is where Kiosk Kate needs to earn her crust) ... for me that sweet-spot, right now is R3 flowing and the opening gambit >200p/s.
As for others doing their homework on SQZ, I would say for sure they have.
Our SP has to re-rate, PERIOD or we will get 'taken out', come May 17th nothing holding them back (lol)!
aimo