Member Info for New_2_LSE2018

The more important question is what will the funding be used for:- 1. Essential operational costs to fulfil the INA contract 2. Costs related to securing permits Or 3. So that everyone who took a pay cut can now get back to full wage???? That’s the question. Imho.

A simple question, CH has taken the approach to propose straight action into the European Court for appeal and damages, however surely he should be going through the Slovenian Courts at the same time as well. Notice I don’t say instead of but supplementary to, preciously the Slovenian courts are the ones that said there was no need for any sort of supporting Environmental Impact Study so surely AST should be going back to them as well? Imho.

We collectively as the shareholders should force the SR, the current status and whether any offer has been received, I think all discussions are verbal hence why they can’t put anything to shareholders, so even if the offer was say 1p, then surely they should be discussing for voting,... imho

Fundamentals of AST good and bad- 1. We were virtually debt free 2. Running costs have been minimised 3. Current has being sold to INA 4. Wells are in decline though and performance reducing 5. Permits required for new wells or re entry of existing wells 6. We have a Fatboy on the board who loves PB as way of raising funding which benefits him imho 7. We still haven’t received anything official from ARSO les, the tweet is only info, wtf All imho.

Also Colin says Yes we will facilitate a call or Q&A to address all questions people have. Thanks Colin So maybe we can work this together with shareholders and the BOD... but still don’t trust him or CC, we have to keep the pressure on. Imho.

Colin replied so he is working, actually am starting to respect him a bit after all this but still as he is in CC pocket- We haven’t received anything officially from Slovenia - there were public holidays on Wednesday and Thursday and not many people have come back to their desks today. I've had similar messages from other shareholders and I will discuss with our advisors what numbers would be appropriate to release. Thanks Colin

Instead of trying to find flaws in my email to CH, why don’t you try being productive as well, the points I asked him do you agree or not???

Whoops was supposed to be Colin. Doh. And I was tryna be nice to him for once and say he was proactive. Let’s see if he replies or ignores me....

Just emailed Colin let’s see what his response is- Dear Colon, Good afternoon and I hope you are well. Great to see you taking a proactive approach with moving the permit situation forward with the ARSO and the energy minister. However would like to ask you must have received something official from ARSO by now to prompt the fund raise RNS this morning? Furthermore to support the fund raise would like to see a further proactive approach:- If the fundraise needs to happen, Colin you need to come up with the following- 1. Forecast of running costs for next year 2. Income projection for next year 3. Costs for the proposed action wrt permits 4. Safety factor for additional funds Sum of the above gives the fund raise required, and this would be a better approach than the previous one if effectively being able to dilute freely without any consultation back to shareholders. Appreciate your thoughts? Regards,

Could be that he did it before the weekend to show the ARSO les and the minister of evil that AST are serious and won’t be taking this lying down anymore. Imho. But time will tell.....

No, no, no. Who decides that? I really don’t see why we are held at the mercy of these muppets. If the fundraise needs to happen, CH needs to come up with the following- 1. Forecast of running costs for next year 2. Income projection for next year 3. Costs for the proposed action wrt permits 4. Safety factor for additional funds Sum of the above gives us the find rajse required. Then mechanism, choose not PB this time, but discounted shares to existing holders. FFS why can’t CH just present his business case like that it’s transparent and the fund raise is limited rather than free reign. Imho.

So why can’t they just issue shares to existing shareholders, the take up will be there am sure imho as the alternative is painful, question is how much needed and yes that’s the question that should have detail with running costs and projection for the next year, that way people will buy in... imho

Crumble to be fair for once CH has been proactive and maybe cos CC fatboy can see moulons that can be made but still let’s see.. imho

New to this share and just bought in, but showing as a sell, guessing fun and games imho.

Think CH should arrange a telephone call like he has done before and canvass opinion.... just a thought

3,000,000 GBP to raise by dilution @ 0.3p, discounted for existing shareholders only. Circa 1 billion shares to be added. Just a thought. But not sure how many LTH now believe this AST CH and CC chuckle brother duo.... all imho... and apologies if my maths are wrong.....

Exactly if there is an offer even with strings attached, ie get the permit and we will pay this then announce it, the shareholders need to be consulted not fatboy CC to see how much he can make from another PB, imho....

Why is PB the only way, why not normal shareholder raise, offer the extra shares to existing shareholders either based on your sxositong holding or open it up, but reward the LTH with discount rather than the mates rates rats.... all imho

Surely bring in new BOD, regain trust and force the issue, CH was looking for a new job anyways he should let someone else now take over the reigns, why he won’t is his share options, with that threat might force him to actually conclude this game of cat and mouse.... imho

We need to all stop pussy footing about, the BOD are not in control of anything, give CH benefit of the doubt but all others are running on fumes, so why have them, I know we need a chairman though and that will be the sticking point.... imho