Member Info for netcurtains

As you can see Mark Dixon still owns a big wad of Triad PLC. He appears to hold longer and larger amounts than either me and Dustbin.... But we all seem to have gone via the same route into various companies. Normally I go for TINY market caps compared to either profits or cash pile. I think SBTX is an exception to our rule. I'm guessing we all think Zenakine is worth a lot more than the market thinks. Below is Mr Dixon's Triad shares:

https://www.marketscreener.com/quote/stock/TRIAD-GROUP-PLC-4001023/company/

Mr Dixon, Dustbin and myself all were large shareholders in Triad PLC.... (a software company)....

Not sure what directed the three of us here, but something did.

Https://www.mintel.com/insights/beauty-and-personal-care/beauty-trends

Of course... It was not a secret. He was quite open about it .

So AS: If Croda pay for silence (the NDA as part of the deal) will the money be seen as a liability until the NDA ends?

11-Nov-25 08:00:34 16.25 654 Buy* 16.00 16.25 106.28 O

11-Nov-25 08:00:34 16.25 2,461 Buy* 16.00 16.25 399.91 O

11-Nov-25 08:00:34 16.25 615 Buy* 16.00 16.25 99.94 O

11-Nov-25 08:00:41 16.05 25,000 Sell* 16.00 16.25 4,013 O

11-Nov-25 08:00:39 16.05 50,000 Sell* 16.00 16.25 8,025 O

11-Nov-25 08:00:25 16.40 100,000 Buy* 15.50 16.25 16.40k UT

The 17.20p was at 1pm yesterday....

Google must us some other calculation or perhaps there was a HIDDEN trade after 4:30pm that we will today at some point. Possibly a very large trade? Who knows. Its interesting.

Yes I know all the others have a different price that is why I said GOOGLE.... That has 17.2p

But why?

Why does google show the current price (8:24am) as 17:20p?

Bazzao:

Interestingly you are so blind that you cant see that "banging your head against a brick wall" applied to us both.... As an investor are you not showing "choice supportive bias" - Whereas I am self-evidently not as I am a shareholder and can see the counter argument.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Choice-supportive_bias

Toyin: You trying to control the parameters of what comes out from reading the article doesn't help your cause.....

Why?

Because it did not make me change my opinion.

But then

My view did not change yours.

So lets just leave it at that.

Toyin, let me put it this way, if you have AF but its very stable (as most people are), in that you can jog, go for 10 mile hikes etc and you never feel dizzy or faint would you "rock the boat" (sleep wise) to get rid of a couple of lines on your face ? I'm 100% certain the article has positives and negatives for Zenakine type products. The main negative is "the unknown" - we just do not know for 100% certain what long term use might do... If it can get rid of wrinkles it might also do something else - most likely the something else is POSITIVE

Toyin: I know for 100% certain that some elderly people with AF are over cautious - I have AF, and old. Do you have AF? Are you old?

Toyin: I didn't say I didn't understand it. I think you need to read what I wrote again.

Toyin, That is for normal people. But at least 10% of the population (possibly more as we age) have AF.... As well as too little sleep, getting too much sleep is bad for AF.... SOME ELDERLY punters obviously are over cautious.

Zero.

Shychap: I would be 100% against any RNS on this issue. It does not need it.

It was negative because it made people right round the entire globe slightly concerned about "concoctions" connected to sleep cosmetics and beauty. To deny that it has some negative as well as positive info is "head in sand" sort of stuff. For sure if you analyse it in detail its mainly positive for us..... But not 100% positive.

Its better to do nothing in 99% of news stories. The medical article was relevant in negative and positive ways... Thus you would expect one or two sells. And hopefully today those will get matched with a few buys.

You only do an RNS saying "There is no reason for large rise/fall" if it gets out of hand... If if it rises too fast too soon (or falls)

Cheers net.

TheContender: You're talking out of your arse. There is no way Ashman saying anything at all that would have stopped the dustman selling, it would of only made it worse. Now its clear that far from reducing sales of Zenakine this research points to a whole new client base - those that were taking the artificial version will potentially switch to the microbiome version. This should boost the share price on Monday.

I think you are all being over hard on dustbin. You all have been going on for months about the bad SEO, missed targets, Superdrug no good, and then we get this medical report.... If I had "bet the farm" amounts of money I would have sold too.

Having said that, SBTX is worth a punt with a small percentage of a well balanced portfolio. I can see the share price rising (touchwood) to around 50p...... But I would not "bet the farm"... Just a percentage of the farm

Cheers Net.