Cobus Loots, CEO of Pan African Resources, on delivering sector-leading returns for shareholders. Watch the video here.
Quiet with the company succeeding in the vote and new name kicked off would have expected a bit more noise
Is very true but as with any sport, knowing the rules or lack of is the key to success. There's only ever one winner and it's rarely pi's ha
I think the weight of speculation alone is justified in the sp at the minute. I agree though if it tips 11/12p without justification suspicions will arise, better to disclose intentions as early as possible to stabilise sp and maintain credibility
Sorry boredom presents itself however one final point, RT is not a specialists per say in investment vehicles and a multitude of diverse strategy and its many opportunities that present themselves despite fronting one although I appreciate he's far better qualified at it than me, however his track record suggests the arena of disruptive technological growth via innovation and acquisition which is one of many fields quob persues but not limited too. ATB
That's were we amicably agree to disagree which of course is healthy discussion based on opinion. I firmly believe rt will only entertain imtk if the agenda suits and my guess is they will given the powerful growth potential and driving force RT is. Another discussion will obviously be the sustainability post growth but that's not my goal so il pass there on the discussion but ultimately wish anyone backing an investment ATB ps you know when I said handing over money I ment via quob investment ;)
Hopefully we can all prosper if everyone is happy. ATB to all investors
"There will be no handing over of money i assure you." Err what's the quob finance vehicle doing purchasing shares and injecting capital orchestrated via rt? "What makes you think he will want to clutch onto his contacts book?" Err astute business sense, let's not confuse consultancy with ambition Now assuming your not completely sheltered and behind the door il summarise the next part RT ousted from significantly similar playing field for buttons. ( sp £6, sold majority circa average 80p) Not usually considered as a back seat driver is actively looking for a listed vehicle ( one would assume rto/ jv, to deliver " distruptive technology solutions" and holds both the contact book, the finance and the innovation to deliver- plus the personnel ( fantastic three/ four, now again redundant- sorry that's my crap humour, see TIG/ Qpp to assist. Also the telematics arena which Richard king ( inginie and refered to as the "fourth") so coincidentally stepped away from recently after achieving pain staking growth (family time I know.... Honest) is tipped for massive growth. Now for the third and last time I will repeat, I agree with your identification for growth, I mearly stated its not guaranteed via RT and soley for the sake of balance did I make the comment. I only hope you don't truly believe a characture such as RT will hand the reigns over to the imtk bod, rather than look for an alternative vehicle if they don't agree. ATB
I'm mobile. I'm well aware this isn't dan as you know full well my point is not to disagree with a single thing you have said more to provide balance. Obviously the company would meet with a wealthy investment strategist such as RT my point again is can rob handle handing the contacts book and money over to the board of imtk? You know the answer is no, so providing they want to work with him we can both enjoy healthy returns it's just not a given was simply the point I was making, no offence intended although I accept I have strange humour
RT is genius at growth and I hold both imtk and dan short term on the strength of his drive. I only ad my previous post for balance as the few posters on here are convinced this will explode. It's not a guaranteed senario and one must consider as talented as he is at growth he comes with a plague of short sellers which both imtk and Dan don't need. Dan even expressed dissatisfaction months ago if quob park were get to big a stake. The investment they want and the contacts to but not RT, it's a case of will that satisfy rob
"The letter will contain an overview of the broad strategy behind our investment, and will lay out our vision for what could be achieved in the short to mid-term if this strategy is followed by the company." But how about the company say er no tar rob your names not to rosey at the mo and we have our own strategy but thanks for lunch. Seems to be a lot riding on both imtk and dan taking RT seriously. Not suggesting they won't listen but I wouldn't be remortgaging on the strength of it