RE: hyr25 Sep 2017 21:14
I don't think it's realistic to factor in having cash to cover an incident like they did in the past. Most aim companies fail not long after such show stoppers, I don't know of any share listed on this index that can be said to have that backup handy. It was lucky that Hydrodec raised cash before the incident, cash I might add, raised whilst they were under a similar debt load, and in public hands. Don't know why you feel that the company must be taken out of public hands, in order to raise cash.
There remains uncertainty but there also remains as much room for improvement. They are still only 52-58% Superfine mix, and previously constrained by feedstock whilst crude was very low. So far, every update has been positive, people saw reason to criticise when they weren't generating cash, now when they are, it's all about not being enough. 2017 has played out pretty much we've discussed in the latter parts of 2016, or at least the way I pencilled it in. The company continues on an upward trajectory, lets hope that is enough for all to be successful down the line.
Regarding sellers under 3%. Thank you for the clarification. I understood what you meant but unless you know someone is selling, then you could equally say that anyone with under 3%, could be selling any other share.