Member Info for Nanonano

I haven't the faintest idea what you're on about. Have you got me mixed up with someone else?

Comments on Haydale belong on the Haydale board.

Boundless optimism, that's the spirit!

https://www.slashgear.com/samsung-q900-8k-qled-85-tv-pre-orders-arrive-with-15000-price-03548614/

Truth will out....eventually.

The share price has been in the doldrums before, and recovered although admittedly never as low as present. It’s got a lot of ground to make up, a launch or two of some good products would soon get things going in the right direction.

Worth remembering I think, that the lions share of Haydale is owned by institutional investors, who aren't generally in the habit of chucking their cash down a black hole.

Doesn't inspire confidence when the former CEO flogs almost ten percent of his portfolio at a big loss.

Would have been helpful to know why the likes of Samsung and LG never took up their tech after early signs they would, bearing in mind the Dow facility was built to supply Korean display OEM's.

Merck don't do film coating as far as I'm aware, and ti's already been stated their core interest is QD colour filters rather than backlight correction, which is still some way off. Wah Hong have always been the sole film coater that Nanoco deal with directly. Others like Kangdexin are through Dow, and likely they 're not at liberty to discuss sensitive information on another companies business.

Well let's hope so.

Nascent industry- are any of the Graphene producers bring in serious cash? They all seem to be in the jam tomorrow stage.

Clearly Haydale share holders have had a pretty lousy 12 months, and the price is now at all time lows, with it seems not much to stop it sinking lower. Credit Suisse offloading 2-3% of their position hasn't inspired confidence.

Looks like LO have reduced again.

Well a big one would be the USA Only affects you if you live there though.

Spread betting is banned in USA, Japan and Australia. Also some countries impose stricter controls, and tax gains. Here in the UK, regulation is looser.

Need to factor in those with CFD's and spread betting with stops. Those mechanisms are banned for good reason in many countries because of the volatility they can introduce into markets.

Very quiet day today, little volume.

Nothing unequivocal when it comes to Nanoco.

I think it odd that a company would use o r manufacturers qd’s In their demo screens, then use a competitors the following year. Added to that is my concern that the screens predicted for q1, then q2 didn’t materialise. Instead screens came with Nanosys dots.

I've said this before, but I believe that Samsung have very likely shared their CFQD tech with Nanosys. They mentioned a while back that they may share tech to give QLED a lift in the market, and bearing in mind they have a significant stake in the company, it would make sense to go with them.

Nanosys have existing infrastructure to supply up to 25 tons of QD's, assuming that's metric tons, then that's enough to supply around 25 million TV's, plenty for the QLED display market going into the 2020's.

The lack of any updates re two significant shows suggest to me that the gig is up with display for Nanoco, and are now doubling down on the sensor market. However that is unlikely to bring sufficient revenue to keep the company solvent beyond end of 2019 without significant revenue from elsewhere. So we are likely back to a further fund raise.

It still materially affects Nanoco through licensing royalties.