Member Info for Mumbo_Jumbo

ongold - once the independent adjudicator gives the verdict, GGP has to sell at that price.

Phil - do you really think that it has any bearing on the SP? I think dissenting views are crucial on any board.

I will give an example of a share I am lookout it - GGP. I am personally not well versed in mining and all its technicalities. I can find hell of a lot of bullish posts, but I seek out the negative views and how bullish posters counteract it, just so that I have sort of balance in information. I do that on all the shares I look to get into.

You are well aware of my views about the technology here and so I do not need to repeat it, but my views have not had any bearing on SP. SO is not looking at my posts and changing his mind about remaining invested or for that matter anyone else.

The reason this is in a bearish cycle is because of the missed timelines in reporting the data and the Market being very bearish on this sector after well reported failures.

I noticed that ARB isn't correlating well on the upside anymore.

The talk is that bitcoin is just another tech share and will correlate with the fall fall of nasdaq in 2022. Its course correcting leading upto feds raising interest rates and selling the asset purchases. Nasdaq is down close to 2% again today.

Its only a profit unless you bank it, well done on that xviolet.

Keep an eye out for NRXP in the next few weeks, its massive re-rate or bust.

EUA - there are so many on there with such religious zeal that I am beginning to think they might be paid to be there. 2 years on and there is no sign of a sale, goal posts keep getting changed to the promise of something even bigger. These are all classic warning signs. This is my view looking in from the outside.

You have to be brave buying in now when there is a large seller in the background.

Well done. Don't have a great record with Miners personally. Rarely get involved in them nowadays.

EUA and GGP are on my radar mainly because of the liquidity that they have. EUA, can't make head or tails if it is a giant scam and GGP not sure if mcap is actually too high already.

beinthelead - because the company admitted today that they have issue with their test. That was my position in early 2021 and my point is that this was all so obvious. The company had failed at port down and chose not to go for re-testing. This was a massive red sign and anyone who pointed that out was viciously hounded here.

AVCT price has been down considerably for some time since the hey day of early 2021, but I haven't posted to "gloat" before. It is the company's own admission that led me to post today.

reported for what? being right?

beinthelead - I was getting similar passages back then... " why post if you are not invested" etc.. should all boards be for ramping only?

doctor100 - when you fail minimum criteria test, then the onus is on you to resolve the issues and come back for a re-test and get it approved. Its not rocket science. Did they ever do that? Sometimes the answers are right there staring at you but you can make yourself believe otherwise.

SweetcorneHorse - On the contrary, much like most people who invest in AIM, I too have fallen victim to this type of plunge. But we all learn and move forward.

Your ire should really be directed those who clogged these boards with incessant ramping. They are the ones who pray on greed and fomo and go after those who post opposing views in a very vicious manner. I have not posted on this board for a long time, but only did so today because ultimately the company has admitted today that they have issues with their tests. And I was saying the same, when the SP was at 200+ in early 2021.

SweetcornHorse - Any thoughts on those that were pumping this in early 202?

Icecool - the government is already putting out feelers that free tests will will come to an end and along with the sea change in attitude of the public towards omicron, the smart money is now leaving covid stocks not just here but in US too.

The fact is that it failed to meet minimum critera at proton down. did they ask proton down to re-test ever since?

PJ12 - seriously are you this naive? Did you you think Avacta could raise the amount the money did if it wasn't for Covid?

If your own Government body is telling you that your test is no good, then you should believe them!! It is as obvious as that and would have saved you a lot of money.

I called it in early 2021 that this company will go nowhere after failing at Porton Down. Predictably, there was howls of disproval. I am posting again today not to gloat but to say that this outcome was obvious back then. It wasn't rocket science, you just had to read the RNSs and follow the performance of the company to date.

The problem with BBs like these is that negative sentiment is hounded and all you are left with is an echo chamber of Ramps. Its all good if you can ride that hype and get out.

I see the many that were opposing my view so vigorously have now either banked their winnings or given up on a loss and moved on.

hydrogen - the blame BOD of GGP and why can't they see it?

Xvoiet - don’t worry some of us will go through the RNS with a tooth comb and post views here or on the other board that we post on.

Atea messed up by including vaccinated individuals in their study. Are you suggesting SNG might have done something similar?

Porky - do you realise that this partnership is peanuts for Merck. If it doesn't work, they don't care. They have partnerships with other companies who are working to increase the efficacy of Keytruda. They need to publish data or explain why they aren't doing so, it's as simple as that.

why not just go and verify what I am saying?