RE: UFO17 Jun 2020 12:34
Pashman,
Hang on a minute, I'm talking nonsense, really are you really suggesting that? I see you have not answered any of my points or posted any rationale for your earlier post.
You say,
"Shares in issue to volume is key. If you have only 1 million shares but no volume you have a low share price, if you continue to see the volume that we have seen the last two trading days then yeah it will only go one way, all small miners pretty much raise funds this way, I personally see this should be valued around 5 million with the assets they have alone,
How about if you only have 1M shares in issue with little volume you may have a high share price, why would you have only a low share price? will it not depend on where you started from!!!
The volume in the last two trading day's is still poor, you need to see 80M plus traded for a continuous period to sustain any rise here, and as for you plucked out of the air £5M valuation, how have you calculated that! Look at the recent acquisitions, and tell me what the total cost was? then discount that cost as nothing has been moved on from when acquired, then look at the Balance Sheet and find out the value stated, you won't find an up to date Balance Sheet but you can be creative, we have already seen that! While you are looking at the Balance Sheet take a look at the profit and loss account, see the losses incurred for six months!! I know six months!! mind boggling isn't it?
Goodness me, do yourself a favour stick you £10k somewhere safer where you will actually make a decent return instead of risking it in here, maximum of £2/3 grand would be enough risk in here at the moment, as once that next placing news hits this will be single digits once again.
Mr T