Member Info for MrMagic

Before I arrived and began to challenge the statements being spouted here HH ramped relentlessly all day. He's challenged me to prove that he does indeed do this and has asked me to post up HIS posts for a day. Sadly this won't make for great reading for most but he won't let it go. So, I paged back quite a few pages to get past the point at which conversation became stressed between the two of us in order to get a real credible average day of Harold's posts. I'm guessing they won't all fit into one post here due to max char limitations so I'll split it up. Can't really believe I'm having to do this, it really incredibly childish but that's how it is. Posts follow

TODAY is NOT a working day. I told you this, you really don;t listen or read do you. EVERY WORKING day you post relentlessly rampign this share. Stop denying it. Jist tell everyone why you do it.

the point AGAIN as you so often do. Your "enthusuasm" just gets the better of you. Please listen, please understand. My question is NOT whether your facts are true or false. I don't care which they are. My question is WHY DO YOU FEEL THE NEED TO POST THEM HOURLY? Do you understand this question? you still haven't answered it. You post the same facts over and over and over and have psuedo conversations with your ramping buddies here. Why do you post these facts every hour, why? please answer THAT question

You can call your posts whatever you like I don't care. To everyone else they're blatant ramps but either way it doesn't matter. The point remains as does the question. Why do you feel the need to post such facts every hour?

Today is Sunday. Come tomorrow, A WORKING DAY, you'll be ramping every hour as usual. Hell you couldn't even resist a little ramp in that last post could you!!! Now, tell the readers WHY ARE YOU HERE RAMPING THIS SHARE EVERY HOUR?

Why am I here? For the sole reason that after initially putting my head through the door to see what RIIG was about I got nothing but insults, abuse, derision and endless come backs from the regs here who clearly think they own this board and that it's their God given right to use it as a platform for blatant ramping. You're DEAD wrong about me regvarny. I'm not a MM nor a trader but frankly any astute reader woth their salt will surely recognise the heavy presence of either MMs or traders or company employees here, desperately trying to Big Up this share. The board is a daily theatrical play of scripted ramps between a selected few posters all pretending to have a conversation. Runs like this: Ramper1: Well I can feel good news is just around the corner, this SP will fly Ramper 2: You think so? that's great, this share is very much under the radar Ramper 3: Look at this old RNS that shows what RIIG s doing and rinse repeat about 10 zillion times per day. It's blatant, it's folling no-one and there can be ONLY ONE reason why such fervent and dedicated people are here ramping like this. And its not because they want readers to share in thegreat profits.

You're about the most amicable and sane person here I think. My behaviour is pretty consistent I thought, I debate my position to the best of my ability and I don't sit idly by when I'm proked or insulted by others. You'll find the pond is still and beautiful until someone does a bellyflop straight into without thinking !

me old fruit flower. . . Do not confuse debating/meaningful discussion with arguing. You WILL certainly find both happening on this board, but only the former from me. Debating requires skills such as listening, being objective, being able to articulate a viewpoint or position, being able to address other people's viewpoints and so on. Conversely, arguing requires only short temper, lack of objectivity, a life ruled by emotion rather than intellect and generally poor respect for other's viewpoints.

The research was relevant TO ME, I'm sorry if you personally find it irrellevant. For whatever reason the rampings off the regs here led me to think "Claims People" was an "old" company that had failed and that RIIG was a new company that was turning everything around. The research I did here helped me to understand the true picture of the companies involved here. That would have been that, however Harold, over zealous as ever, decided to check my research with JFdirectly and that resulted in new additional information being revealed. That led to a little more digging which revealed the info in my last post. People always say DYOR, so that's all I'm doing. None of the research is necessarily negative in any way towards RIIG or towards JF himself. The research is factual and thus truth, and it has become clear to me that this is the only way I will get such truth as no-one on this board so far is really up for real discussion, only psuedo scripted ramping disguised as discussion.

See Harold's transcribe of his direct communication with JF. Only 1 page back TBH ! It states: ".I know nothing of The Claims People Limited or Claim Analysts Limited as we do not trade with those names" As to your question "Why would he care?" well, I guess if I was running a company called say "Coca Cola PLC" and someone else started up another company called "Coca Cola Limited" on the same day and registered to the same office as my company I'd personally not be happy. I wouldn't want someone elses company getting confused with my own, would you? Also I agree with you that it probably IS very common for directors to have multiple companies, I just don't think it's normal for the directors of a company to be unaware of each others companies. And at no time did I say or suggest that any of this was a negative against RIIG. Why have you assumed this is negative?

Been out all day so just caught up. Interesting response from JF There. My comments on that : As I originally stated we were not sure if CLAIMS PEOPLE DIRECT LIMITED based in Shoreham were in any way connected to RIIG or the other "Claims People" related companies. JF confirms that it is not so that's great, we can eliminate that from our list. Then we have the statement from JF that "I know nothing of THE CLAIMS PEOPLE LIMITED or CLAIMS ANALYSTS LIMITED". Fair enough, I accept this statement. However, this left me somewhat confused because the 3 companies here are so similar. My confusion is really not that surprising if you look at the following data,: Company ID 03922895 - Started up 10/2/2000 - THE CLAIMS PEOPLE GROUP PLC now renamed as RIIG (JF's company) Company ID 03922897 - Started up 10/2/2000 - curr called THE CLAIMS PEOPLE LIMITED Company ID 03922902 - Started up 10/2/2000 - curr called CLAIM ANALYSTS LIMITED 3 almost consecutive company house ID numbers and in addition please note that the registered office for ALL 3 OF THESE companies is Lion House, Red Lion Street, London, WC1R 4GB. I felt that this warranted a little more research so I took a look at the 2 companies in question, 2 companies which were incorporated on exactly the same date and which have exactly the same registered office as JF's company. In particular I was keen to see who the directors were. This is what I found: THE CLAIMS PEOPLE LIMITED - directors include Barry Whyte and Stephen Coke CLAIMS ANALYSTS LIMITED - directors include Barry Whyte and Stephen Coke I think most here recognise those names. Barry Whyte is Non Executive Director of RESOURCES IN INSURANCE GROUP and Stephen Coke is Finance Director/Company Secretary of RESOURCES IN INSURANCE GROUP. All of this is basic company information which is freely available to all. As a potential investor of RIIG, I think it concerns me somewhat that JF, the Executive Chairman of RIIG, is totally unaware of 2 companies being directed by 2 of his own fellow company directors, companies which were incorporated on exactly the same day, registered at exactly he same office in London and one (THE CLAIMS PEOPLE LIMITED) which has almost the same name as his own company (THE CLAIMS PEOPLE GROUP PLC). I don't understand how a group of directors, who are all supposed to be working together for the benefit of RIIG, are able to be running separate companies of similar names without each other's knowledge. That makes no sense to me. I'd be interested to hear other people's views of what this all means. I found it all totally confusing and it's not what I expected to find TBH. I'm done with this research at this point.

Is he your Norwegian Blue? Does he have "beautiful plumage"?

to filter me and leave me posting

I think you're being a little harsh on young Harold there. Give him some slack lol

Ok how would you like to pigeon hole the statement " typical yank mentality your fault the world is f..d imo"? Anti-American? Anti-Western? Go for it

I'm 46 not a laddy. I understand respect, I'm not a racist like you, I don't look down on the "little people" like you and I'm very happy. You have baggage and a shed load of issues and all your posts suggest you're very young and inexperienced in all the really important aspects of life. In time all will become clear son.

" typical yank mentality your fault the world is f..d imo! Wow, no bounds to your levels of abuse are there? I could have you banned right there, but unlike you, I'm far more mature than that. Equally I'm far more astute too because I've managed to deliberately make you think I'm from the US. That was just too easy lol. Still maybe I am maybe I'm not. Doesn't really matter. But racism and looking down on small investors . . . utterly disgusting.

You keep mentioning new premises Harold. Do you truly believe this makes a significant difference? The accounts are what matter. In the last Interim Accounts it states that the TOTAL ASSETS of RIIG are 658,631K Do you believe that's "a lot of assets" for a company? Incidentally what do you think of these new premises? Good ? Bad? better than before? if so how?

already cleared this 1-2 days ago. Page back

are you so overtly defensive about this share? If you TRULY believe this share is going to be great then all you need to do is sit back and wait. Nothing one person can say on a board like this will EVER affect a share price. To think so is utterly delusional. Think this through. Even if I was the deramper you accuse me of being (which I'm truly not) there is NO WAY my deramps could ever affect the SP. Never never never, thats not how it works. So the more you put up walls the more desperate your position looks. It makes it look like you have loads invested here and you can see it all going South and you're desperate to get as much positive sentiment out there as possible. Just relax. If RIIG is good, it WILL deliver and THAT and THAT alone will raise its SP. Just like me, nothing you put out here, however positive, will affect the SP. That's NOT how it works. So why are you so defnesive?