RE: Market Abuse21 Feb 2020 13:19
I’m not sure how the mechanics of it all work out but if one shareholder is told company sensitive information, then ALL shareholders must be told. Is that not correct?
It still rankles me that there were posters on here (I won’t name them, you know who you are) that were/are major shareholders, and they didn’t lose their s*#t after the 300% dilution. However, up to that point they disputed that a raise was on the agenda and there was programmed steady selling in the four to six weeks prior. The same people disappeared from posting on here for a few weeks and then reappeared announcing what a great opportunity to buy it was. Therefore, I firmly believe there were ‘people in the know’, back then. Can’t say I’ve noticed it as much this time but it all leads me to believe, BRD is a bit on the bendy side of right and wrong.