Member Info for MrHumbles

Oh well, leave Blue Strike 7 to it. Next ping?

'Shutdown'

Id take those RL mid orders off 5p if i were you lot

Sincerely

'BlueStrike'

'But since your only a newcomer to the AIM markets I understand why your lacking trading experience'

Trader eh? Here comes blue strike team for your 'experience' loool

So OPTI stated not selling? (having now dumped 41% of the float prior). So who is?

Market is telling you all you need to know. The insiders no more believe it was contingent, than the future probe will from external powers.

As a matter of interest, given the whole board etc will be under the spotlight - is there an external party hired to oversee this?

Only telling you what the corps say BigPunt. I have no personal opinion on it as I have never advised Bluechips etc on such matters.

It is AIM of course. Some holder could announce 40% at an average of 3p, and suddenly the just received news, it does exist haha

BigPunt, I do not know if you will end up being right or wrong on it. But what I do know, is that if it's anything other than what the last RNS has presented to market, it will be shut down that day anyway. Be huge misrepresentation. Far bigger than the current one.

No indication of future uncertainty . The accrued royalty was already recorded, but the issue is about its validity, not timing or collectability. Contingent revenue arises from future conditions or uncertainty, which is not the case here.

'never validly earned or collectible' is the legal interpretation of the statement, and its inclusion in the audited accounts constitutes a prior-period misstatement rather than contingent revenue.

There is not a corp lawyer out there that will see it differently.

BigPunt,. This is not contingent revenue;. It is revenue that should not have been recognised in the first place due to misrepresentation.

Total certainty. Unless they all want to go to jail, it was not a timing issue.

And if a timing issue but a valid future receipt, simply would have had a simple correction to report release. Nothing more.

Trust not relevant. RNS is . They would have had to declare it a timing issue ad still recognise it. Material mislead of not. Be worse than the misrepresentation. They would have made sure, best advice to cover themselves for that one.

If it was only a timing issue and not imaginary, they had to say it so market not misled . It was very very clear. Not a timing issue.

Probably seeing investigations unfold in real time

Il say it once and once only for those punting this price. It['s dead. Blue strike 7 is in a position rarely witnessed. A stack of negatives occurring in same tight window. That's not retail . And i reckon they can hold off the prints if just run the total algo block ahead of liquidity - meaning if never completes, can hold off on the print.

Know they are being monitored

Probably post with a 3rd stamp class from Singapore and make it 20%

'Laura, bel is correct, MD didn't inform the market until he was at 9%.

So, not in theory, 9% can be dumped before notification?

Confirmed - Blue Strike 7 is inbound. This week, most likely today - the floor is dead - SP to follow