Member Info for MrHumble

Off to watch O Hara now. At least he talks billions even if it is only chubby people numbers.

I shall 'self-exclude' at this point all. i do believe another matrix is coming and so, i may feel more welcome there.

Before i go, I would just like to profoundly apologise to you all, for discussing risk on investments on a financial forum

. I shall join Buffet and Co, down in Broadmoor now.

Adieu

Those trades were known. Somebody on adv predicted them, before 11am. Probs only a guess tbf. Most likely newbie luck

But when is the CEO presenting? I was not expecting a victimised messenger boy.

Very impressed with the details so far. Stripped all the talk away and the numbers are great.

If i pop back to analyse the analysis later? I can't wait to read it all.

Possibly even engaging with media, not notorious for public perception protectionism, example defamation campaigns, would also be a good move. It is a bad look, when reading BB's every day, and still in affect, employing it.

But that is just my opinion. Im off now to take the only advice offered here - and see the shrink

Later all

Personally I just hope Stewart gives a professional presentation this time around. Letting us all know that he spends half of each day reading BBs (by referring to them), is a bit of a put off, when pondering a buy in a PLC. This is not what we want to be diluted 10% at a time for.

Not long now.

Anyone else got minimum expectations today?

ShyChap was not shy about it. Any other points?

It's not like you need English translated by others, post event. I look forward to reading a broad range of analysis tonight.

Do not worry. If I do not agree, i wont make it about me - and call in the doctors. I respect all views. Even the ones that spread lies for CEO's. After all, some of the best red flags,are those paid for. You should all realise the value in that by now...

Not sure why people have to be so abusive. All I ask is for clarity. None on the BB's so I ask it of the company.

I think such posts are a reflection on anyone but moi really.

But it's ok. It is AIM. It's not like they have a hope tof making a few quid in any other market. I accept is as 'just business'.

And let's be honest - when nothing else sells? Refer to the best - in any way possible haha

Well, I am off to have some overnight oats and an avocado. Followed by 10 cigars and gin at 11am.

I shall not interrupt the post IM analysis here. I look forward to reading it.

Q3 unfortunately, is about adjusting for the bad to come. Across books. The lead sign is all the selling by fund managers in the US, as SPX sits above circa 6180. The lag penny drop affect shall be sub it.

Why do i say this? I think we need to give OPTI and SBTX credit for near same time raises. They seem well advised on a probable Q3/Q4 global environment.

'And they battened down the hatches' . As shychap suggests but maybe for other reasons - to get sign offs on accounts next time around.

I can see Q4 RNS's already

'Due to unforeseen future global impacts when we raised cash.............

High quality posts Shychap. Very good. I know you will state positives where seen too. So it is a credible update. My problem is calling a pig a pig, even during a lipstick window. It does not go down well , but the SP eventually does

According to my newbie book 'An article itself is not a trading or investing execution call. it is not determining where you should do what. It is an opinion piece. It is why they all have disclaimers, chartered or kangaroo. Many opinions will be behind paywalls, where least exposed to actionable consequences etc etc'

The problem with opinion, is that if it is not structured properly, it is simply based on a bias.

I like to see extracts from IM's, AGM notes etc etc

I always ask myself as I read - 'what formed that particular view? Where did that number come from?

I should not have to ask myself these questions. Each point should have an extract from somewhere, referenceable back to the company itself.

When this is not so, I just simply say to myself 'Just another BB view really, but at a cost'

Peeps - up your standards - demand from the company what you pay for - facts.

PS dont rush to print. Take time. Software available out there, even free now, that listens and can give a transcript 10 seconds after full IM.

Study it carefully. Think silently - then , and only then - produce

Guys, hasnt the company itself been the whole and long term NDA (Not Declaring Anything), hidden behind periodic numbers , only of the type that are easily washed away later?

I expect to see some professional articles post this IM. Focussed solely on the below and the 'real value' behind every sentence.

And maybe a footnote about being brilliant of course. Obligatory sign off.

See you all tonight. A lot of work to do today, in real markets lol

Can i ask a question without my being then associated to the KGB?

Past numbers (such as revenues), are proven of no use here. Fact. As all know.

What are your minimum expectations/requirements today, in terms of 1. deal structure detail 2, Internal net Forecasting (we need to see the models too given how poor that has been) 3. 4M spend drill-down 4. Numbers long overdue on acquisitions - net? Still not able to determine where money goes in and out? 5. A total costs forecast for the year? 6. Croda and - oh , forget that one - standards set. Actually, I suspect you have at least 25 minimum requirements for today.

What are they?

These guys are , in affect, money managers - managing your money via stock value. You would walk in to an advisors office and accept 'NDA - but as expected? And no numbers?

I note the tone has sunk to new lows today, as we all request future account details for the 4 million superdrug spend.

Alas, if I was surprised, id be a gerbil too, when you think about it.

'poster hacked the system'

It sounds to me like there is a campaign attempting to stop people clicking any links other than one?

That's business I suppose. But to be fair, if somebody had the ability to hack systems, do you think it would only be for one website?

You all just spent another 4 million here. You all paid directly. So I expect 'your' expectation s today, for detail, to be of Citibank or Goldman Sachs requirements.

Anything less is not acceptable - unless a gerbil of course. Then they need not have an IM at all. Just post a reach to cover all detail.

'Pleased to announce - 'as expected'

Another chance, usually means compensation paid for public humiliation

Simon, Stewart - you are going to have to at least pretend you are not speaking to gerbils today.

'They are all watching'