Member Info for MrHumble

Hard to leave without a positive. I've done everything to find one.

Ok. For the past 3 years, OPTI spiked every July for no reason at all bar maybe due to offloads for accounting reasons for others lol.

Even though we had the big spike here to sort the discount via selling, for 17p, that was last month.

I know, it is grasping at straws that maybe it is SBTX's July turn for a change. But at least it's something.

'That poster is off his trolley re 110M' i hear you say.

Actually, you don't even have to ask me. One of your advisors should also have a recording of one, yes - ONE, participant, laughing about making many millions years ago out of a blag lol.

It is most likely too conservative an estimate really

Point is,

... Im not sure

bye

Here is a very general rule of thumb on the UK little caps for prolonged periods of losses.

Whatever money is raised/borrowed etc, and depending on the liquidity ratio, you can times that from a range of 10% to 200% - and that is roughly how much has actually been made behind the scenes. SP is irrelevant for this. And to understand it, it goes way deeper than buys and sells obviously

Looking at SBTX money raised and not a great liquidity ratio, a fair estimate of money made from it's existence to date, is approx. 110M

Now, that is distributed out to a lot of incomes and the many methods to make, risk free. But its a fair estimate for now.

Anyone know the YoY other income taxation at SBTX since inception? Eye weeping.

I shall pray for you all - and hope you get a quick spike. If you ever want to know where reserve orders are placed for any such event, only need ask. But no rush to be asking that really

Mr Humble

Tbh, given the exponential tax rate per pound on AIM (circa70p to other incomes), Im really not seeing value offered by anyone for the bang on the buck

There there is the conflict of interests issue albeit i base that on on Risk.

PI's 100%, all others 0%

Board members/ Employees

NOMADs/Other brokers

Auditors

Accountants

Media

Seeders/Funds (Paid to mess up PI money lol)

The list is extensive but the point is, the only people that do not derive a monthly income of some form from markets, are those financing everything re 'real' PI's.

And also the group the only group that lose, obviously.

Way I see it, if going to pay all that and own all the risk, surely you want value return for all the incomes you pay?

As a matter of interest, did any of you ever dig in to the finances properly, of many an AIM crew and simply ask yourself, looking at holdings in particular periods - how on earth did they make that much? Saw a great piece on it albeit mostly about US ones - at the moment... They tracked everything declared and some years they should have been completely slaughtered via holdings - reported bumper profits

Fund maps are great. But only of value if you have tracked every transaction in their own history. Makes great reading when you overlay it on charts and watch a company morph with all transactions. Might know somebody with a map for that lot. Il ask

Anyone know the sell price?

Interesting. Just looking now at their strategic reasoning for such sells elsewhere over the years. The strategy seems very simple lol

Alas, possibly covered by #4 NDA, and as such, no point asking the question? I do not know. However, I believe a lot of questions are answered in some places. So maybe we can have a look at those, at a later date.

Have a great weekend, week - and year, all.

However, there could be a positive not yet addressed. An important one.

If this is not a case of simply 'paid shelf-space leasing', and the other party have been begging for this to go on shelves with no charge (due to foreseen profit margins for them), this indeed, would change the game.

Interesting breakdown albeit not really relevant when you consider the raise drill-down at the IM? Stock & Packaging - no numbers on marketing. 'Chunky' described initial stock outlay.

Whilst I admire your work Net, The Effort to Result Ratio is not really company specific aligned, is it?

I shall await actual numbers rather than those derived from a bot, that has no inkling of the facts, same as I.

However as time passes, im sure your number 4 will be heavily referenced.

It does look like a form of NDA. But as i said, we already know the general allocation for stock. So a minimum term contract from Winclove is not relevant to the superdrug terms at all.

The only difference is, we are expected to assume it lol

Does not apply to 1. How much was stated will be spent on stock and packaging. And 2. A commitment of a now known number, as payments assured to Winclove.

That's it - for eal. Safe to return now. I shant be back until Asia and America takes over the UK

Mr Humble

Heads up

'A COO is not an irony'

Tokugawa

We do have a COO now. And I am sure his job will be to bring great clarity to market, on all things. He just needed a first day intro. Free ticket day.

i suspect all details will be revealed as most are not market sensitive now we know the spend allocation , in the next week or so. Looking forward to him not being your standard AIM COO by the time the end of week 2 arrives, starting yesterday.

I must go now. The Americans are going to remove my brain, and place it into a time-warp machine to meet their future selves there, and all come back together. - to a new reality in the present time.

Adieu