Barclays Bank – a cheap stock, technically7 Dec 2021 22:12
A detailed write up here by the Investors Chronicle. I will include the link and summary below.
Just one word of warning, I was only allowed to click on the link and read the article in full on one occasion. Thereafter, it was asking me to register. So just bare this in mind before you click on the link. A good 5 minute read:
Summary:
“
Not exciting but a strong technical story
This is not an especially exciting story and any bull case on the stock is largely a technical one, but one that is nonetheless well-founded. The board is clearly convinced that there is scope to sustain a much higher Return On Assets (ROA) even if still below the weighted average cost of capital (WACC) and the analyst community appears similarly on-side. The problem is that many fund managers remain cautious and are somewhat jaded after watching poor performance for much of the past decade. Several more quarters of improved performance are likely to be needed to change hearts and minds. So, any rerating of the stock does not appear imminent. It does feel as though it will come in time, but any private investor looking at buying Barclays does need to proceed with their eyes wide open. Banks are still inherently risky, geared cyclical businesses and Barclays has had the additional burden of losing three chief executives following a string of scandals. The dividend is forecast to rise from last year's 1p to 6p this year, then on to more than 9p by 2023 so more than a 5 per cent payout looks to be on offer at this point, which should be something of a cushion for the risk.
There are still a lot of questions over the pace, extent and sustainability of recovery here and relying on a largely technical argument for buying a share is not the most compelling. While it does feel as though there are many stronger buy cases in the market today, there is certainly some allure in a potential c50 per cent capital gain and a 5 per cent yield, but Barclays is still only one for the less risk-averse.”