Member Info for mowzerrocks

Enjoyed this - thanks!

Booster seat AND a full face snorkel mask - he will be able to breathe (sigh) but (as I found with my kids whilst swimming) it SIGNIFICANTLY reduces the screaming and squeals from the little blighters.

hahahahaha....i can 'smell' NDN blowing his top from here over being labelled ramper!

This reminds me of moleman's deramper list.

I agree very much with the judging aspect of so many with regards to Myles. I take issue with some of the implied insider knowledge bits from him and others but the research element is balanced and well thought out.

The constant sniping and attempts (more like sieges) to take them down really says more about the aggressor than the target and detracts so much from any valid points the aggressor may have and yes I think there are a number of good points from some of them but it is completely lost under a thick layer of venom.

Remember most investors have big boy (or girl) pants on and can make their own minds up and do their own research. I just think it is more powerful to state your own opinions in a well thought out respectful manner with research than to try to attack and belittle others.

I think we forget that opinions are just that. Without research and evidence to back it up, you leave your post open to valid criticism. The research side has sadly been lacking (LFT had been done to death) so hopefully AVA6K should bring that dynamic back to this board.

I also like how so many ignore the major offenders lately - I’ve been converted.

I would imagine that there would be potential for leakage of the chemo drug into the rest of the body still possibly causing some side effects? So after the FAP releases the doxorubicin at the site of the tumour it could travel else where in the body still, but it does makes sense that it would less so than the normal dosing method. I would imagine that there would still be the potential for the released doxorubicin to attack active cells in the body. I hope that data is what will be available Q4/Q1.

However it needn’t be perfect results as even a 50% reduction in side effects would be amazing and potentially allow more cycles and better chances of recovery- not to mention potentially widening the population that could tolerate doxorubicin (those with heart problems) .

I have always found this part of Avacta the most interesting and exciting - as I know cancer will directly effect my life in one way or another at some point .

Hilarious. Missed you Indy - glad to see the shaking hasn't ceased.

This is really interesting discussion. Thanks for sharing - obviously we can't sure of the details but I certainly felt relieved that AS did seem a tad more than pleased. I'm surprised 'legal' allowed that amount of information to flow.

I would imagine that in any company resource is a limit to any project. It may be that there are more profitable projects or further along projects that require x resource and something had to be pulled. Speculation obviously, but deciding not to go forward isn't as simple as 'it didn't work'. I think comfort from the LG payment should provide enough comfort that affirmers have a variety of applications.

Well that is the beautiful thing about this - if it can produce any benefits then it will be life changing first of all to the patients.

I will have to rewatch the presentation again. It is fascinating.

Cashless it is senseless. I think many forget that Covid was a complete diversion for Avacta but a great opportunity to show off affimers. They still managed to keep AVA6k on track. Those who invested for covid knew it was a risk. Look at GDR for example. At least we have a product ready for sale and the longer term market looks like it will be around (sadly) longer than we thought last year. Disappointed yes but equally pleased that the patient doses have progressed and AS is very pleased. I would ‘guess’ that it would mean that side effects are significantly less. It would obviously be too soon to establish impact on the tumour? Or would there be other markers that could be measured to determine impact?

Tell me - someone please. What kind of investor puts money into a company and then sl4gs off the ceo incessantly? I mean seriously - wtf? Why on earth if you had such venom to spout would you put your hard earn cash effectively in their hands?

I don’t think AS is unworthy of criticism (and I honestly think he would agree) but this torrent of abuse is quite frankly a bit sick. If Egghead wants to offer his unprofessional services to do ‘a better job’ I’m sure most at Avacta would laugh and find a two finger salute to show him the exit.

The Cash position is still good (ludicrous placing chat put to bed) and trial is progressing and shorts will be getting more nervous every month that goes by without negative news. I’m happy to wait.

Indeed!

I wondered who Big Hero reminded me of…
Trump.

Energy - I was actually thinking that he could use a jerry can as a urinal at night and try to sell it... you know a back up plan if it all goes **** up.

Moving on like a demented hamster on his wheel I see.

Whatever Eggy - maybe your game is to just provoke. I did say that it wouldn’t help.

I find your personality and your posts quite unbalanced most of the time and your tone vile. I even expressly declared that I didn’t completely disagree with some of the content and yet apparently that makes me nothing but a ramper. You are so blind to your own arrogance the fact that your posts have the opposite effect of your stated intentions. Bit of a failure all round - unless your game is purely to provoke.

A lot of posts have gone MIA. I have a theory that LSE have some kind of logic that if a post in a thread is reported as libellous it is auto removed. Maybe it has only just been worked out and someone is going into overdrive?

Kong - The danger is really only that the board is clogged and it takes longer to find anything useful. I’m happy to read all useful discussion positive or negative, but the campaigns of vitriol and negativity to discredit those with positive opinions in the name of balance or altruism are just not believable and sets off the dominoes of back and forth abuse. That was my point in the OP.

I’ve said many times before my issue with the main offender is not particularly the content but the tone. I do also take issue with middle of the night one liners that only be interpreted to spread fear.

wyndrum - there is a bigger picture. There are many approaches to investing and your preference is just one. Holding after researching is one for sure. Trading can cause a lot of losses if a volatile stock. Look at BTC for example. Spread betting is an easy way to get underwater very quickly.

I agree with the topping up sentiment. However I would refer to you to my point about the actual impact of such statements. I think it is an illusion that has been painted that there are lots of people throwing money in based on the rampers. It is the justification that those who bombard this board with negative sentiment which ultimately clog it up - and I think it just needs to be called out.

Wyndrum - food for thought...

Have you tried to use this BB as a trading discussion when in fact 99% of the posters here don't come for that? You try to engage in trading discussions littered with analysis of the company and given that we are down that analysis is undeniably going to be negative - it has to be, otherwise why would be down so much?

It is like shopping at Sainsbury's for DIY materials. You might find a wee bit of what you want, but what you have been doing is standing outside the store with a loudspeaker shouting about the crappy paint Sainsbury's sells. I'm not trying discredit any of your TA or motives - but you need to see the bigger picture. Given that the diversity (or lack of) is what makes this board- you need to understand your audience better. It is what it is. It would be better if this board could be split into topics, but you will never please most people.

My take on you is that you are mostly a trader and in that respect sentiment is important. However you have reported being invested, I think that is what many here take issue with. Maybe you can be both, a trading stack and a holding stack. But if you are holding 80%, then you aren't going to spout negative stuff as it *COULD* impact the majority of your exposure. That is the information that others will use to judge you.

Every post on here is judged. Those that think they are preaching are the problem. Arrogance will get you abuse. Ignore it if you like, but I don't see much ignoring going on, do you?

Again this is not an attack, I have only taken a step back and try to understand the dynamics of why this board is so poor at the moment.

So a version of this got removed earlier. Upon reflecting all the deleted posts and how this board has gone to the dogs (no offence doggy) I thought it might be worth a reshare - I know it should be obvious but all the bickering is insane here.

So here it is - apparently rocket science for some.

People who invest in companies by buying shares do so to make money. No one does it to lose money. This is a simple fact.

Those who post excessively in a positive manner about a share don’t arouse suspicion because the simple fact above. It is expected the same way a company promotes its goods by advertising. It is pretty easy to scroll on by.

Most (not all) people do their own research (DYOR) and those that don’t learn their lesson pretty quickly. Those that DYOR don’t invest based on positive posts on BBs or the Myles’ of Twitter. They come looking to share research. They make their own minds up and invest their own money. They blame themselves if it goes south. This is what mature and measured investors do.

People who post excessively (day and night) with little else than negativity (even if littered with snippets of backhanded positivity) arouse suspicion for obvious reason - see my point above, the making money part.

Altruism is a really weak alibi- especially on an anonymous board. Perhaps if you used your real name and put your very own reputation on the line … but even then no one would believe you were invested - which many purport to be. It just isn’t credible.

Certainly there can be some mental issues here at play - jealousy, narcissism, etc. To dedicate so much time day and night to posting on LSE is disturbing. It just isn’t normal behaviour or a sign of mental balance. Time differences or bladder issues used as excuses - true or not - are just not believable. I will repeat, even IF true, it is just not believable and will only make you a target. It is perfectly fair when you aren’t putting your name on the line. AND when you add the arrogance and the sheer volume of posts - you can see how the accusations of trolling come about.

I’m not particularly fond of the Twitter Uber rampers but in the case of Myles he has shared a lot of his research and it is good research. I wouldn’t pay much attention to any alluding of inside knowledge from him or anyone else.

And that is the perpetual question does someone else know something I don’t? Best to not believe the hype NOR the negative tripe. Just DYOR and risk what you can afford to lose and set your limit in terms of exposure. It really needn’t be rocket science.

Sorry such a lengthy post just felt that it is a balanced post and got removed in the deletion of the other thread. I’m sure it will do no good.

Cue abuse: