Member Info for Mousekewitz

PAF :-) But it took them about 10 years :-) However, they're a different business ;-)

LTH, it's the BBC, they always have to add something to everything. It's called 'framing' ;-)

Thank you, Kuurj. I agree that lenders like Amigo (and also Provi) are necessary. I was in around 2009 in a situation, that I needed a bridge loan of a few hundred pounds, in between having sold one and buying a new house. We, of course, first turned to our bank only to find out that they wouldn't grant a small loan, but only one of a minimum of £10000 or more. Now, that was not what we wanted, so went with Provi for a small bridge loan to cover until everything was straight again. Lenders like Amigo (and Provi) don't just serve people who can't get a loan no matter what, but also those who just need a bridge without getting tied into a huge loan, plus interest for that, plus mortgage. People who just need a loan: "Thank you for your help, here's your money back plus interest - nice knowing you". Had we gone for the loan-offer of £10000 it would have chipped our credit status significantly, whereas going through Prov at that time, it actually boosted it. That is what people need to know and not the stories of people who take out loans by lying about income they never had.

Somebody posted a link here one, two days ago, which stated that over 70% of claims get thrown out for not being valid. That should be another fact that should work in Amigo's and thus in our favour. The problem with the Debt Camelteers, is that they throw all lenders into the same bag, tie the knot and see it fit to give them a good thrashing. Where there has been Payday lenders and other lenders, that have used threatening behaviour towards their customers, I don't think Amigo has done anything like that. The way I see is that without the CMCs having been told to lay of the banks with their PPI claims, Amigo (and also Provi) would not in the position they're in now, but that would also mean, that we wouldn't be here having invested and some of us, on the lowest SPs of all times and therefore owning substantial amounts of shares, some in here in 1 million and more. I just hope that the judge(s) will have investigated the situation with the same diligence as we have in here and if they did, then there should be no problem.

LTH, I was just thinking the same, when I came back from the kitchen (making a huge pot of soup) and read the recent posts :-) . Now we practically get accused of stalking/following him, but most of us have been here a lot longer. So who is following who? :-) . Must have something to do with the lack of meds and Full Moon ;-)

So, now you are telling us that we should be glad to be able to read your posts, because most of the time they get deleted. Two questions:
1) Don't you think most of your posts being deleted, may have a reason you shouldn't be proud of?
2) Have you run out of medication?

Jubberjim... have I rattled on your cage? I might be wrong, but I don't think I have mentioned you in my most recent post over Camel Folks and CMCs spitting bile before the court hearing, or have I? I really fail to understand why your are blowing a fuse over something that really doesn't have anything to do with (or has it?), but you will surely have your reasons.

That is even better, Ninja, I just glanced here on lse.

By the looks of things I have missed an exiting day, but therefore my garden is getting more and more ready. Last two trades at 17:07 and 17:13 . The 17:07 one is great, but for the 17:13 trade, it being so late, I would have expected something with a bit more umpht :-) . Now we have a weekend to see observe if we find any releases and keep an eye on the usual suspects from Debt Camels & Co. I have a feeling they might be more active than usual spreading their bile before the court hearing.

First of all, shares don't get sold to shorters. Shorters borrow shares, they don't buy them. Secondly, why would JPM buy shares of a company that, providing it survives, would already be undervalued the very moment it becomes clear that it will survive? That strategy doesn't make any sense to me at all.

Amigo is not going down! End of! The Camel Woman is about to deprive herself of an income, for what else is she going to turn to next? She's a sad creature, who helps nobody but herself and the court will see that. The court will also see how she led unsuspecting people into her spider web of deceit, making promises of returns that she has no power over and to make a quick buck for her own organisation. No matter how much she is putting on her huffing and puffing, the court will see her for what she is! Her voice is only one that is loud and screaming lies doesn't turn them into truth.

Back over 15 to buy, all is good :-)

I wish I had the funds to buy 1 mio shares right now :-)

There is now nearly 1p in between buy and sell price.

Mark, if they do that again, we all buy more and that way let them know where the hammer is hanging ;-)

The MMs are trying really hard, but to me it looks as if the new Buy-Price will stay at around and over 16p

Bradleybear, who do you mean :-) Certainly not Kaye? :-)

Add to that the time they've not been operating, the economic crisis caused by Cov19 and the inflation since, I think £6 would be realistic ;-)

I wish I was a fly on the wall to see the faces of those you just sold into the dip, Crypto. It's now seem to head straight for 17 to buy.

Edging back to 16 :-)