Member Info for moonwalk

It has been more than five years since Bleepa came on the market. Surely this prompts questions such as, how has the medical world managed without it all this time if it truly meets a real need? In those 5 years there has been a revolution in the development of AI, has Bleepa kept up or more likely, been overtaken by better alternatives? How many of us are using a 5 year old phone, eating five year old peas from our freezers, still wear masks, and happy to have Boris as pm? The world has changed everywhere but not Feedback

What is the current nav of Truetide, there are only a few holdings and all are listed ?

AP00 The usual traps of the (post crises ) situations seem to be absent, for example not many small companies generate cash, let alone at such a ratio to market cap. The technical positives are largely lost on typical ‘investors’ in micro caps (though not micro for long hopefully)

A potential turnround, as near invisibile as its possible to be, this is what real contrararians seek. If and when there are three or four posts a day here, it may be too late to make an entrance..

Found these, 6 years separate them…

https://youtu.be/EFndpahbvoM?si=weRYQXPUTYgODdJh

https://youtu.be/yyDghMuConE?si=t4JnamyVmzcpTOP5

Keep up dickpuller, TB is much too old to have a living granny

Https://youtu.be/REQkPUlD6jk?si=FepMoN8JSVmoebkU

My view is that, self evidently there is no real demand for this product. It has been available for a few years now but with barely any commercial interest. TO assumed that it was a good idea and that demand would follow because of that. However if serious money had been spent on market research and a product was then developed to meet actual, as opposed to assumed demand the outcome would have been different. Either Bleepa would have been abandoned in favour of a product with actual demand or TO would had to rethink. The whole company now has a market cap of £5m and on a declining trend. If it had been a real innovative and strongly demanded concept, a competitor or trade buyer would have bid for it by now

This is a chronicly loss making project but for whose benefit? As far as I can ascertain the salaried insiders are the sole beneficiaries. The main draw seems to be the huge numbers of shares punters get for every speculative £, can anyone explain to me how any shareholder has made any money being involved here over the past 10 years? I’m not getting it

Another perspective is that the CEO got lucky with Covid and without it the company would have gone nowhere. Check prior history for verification of that perspective. The CEO is now grossly overpaid because there is zero evidence that the legacy income can be replaced by new home testing kit, and the lions share of the income, though much diminished, is still Covid. You have to look hard to find any other AIM tiddlers paying £350k to a CEO. The cash will soon be gone on any realistic assessment of the future

Has anyone thought to ask how much money has been paid in various forms, to the Nanosynth CEO? This is a straightforward question with a factual answer and a not acceptable would be to refer questioners to the accounts

If they are all mates, to put it into simple language it is possible that the disposition of assets could be influenced by prior relationships

Do you really need me to draw you a diagram?

The key question to ask is, did anyone at Resolve, know Mark Duffin prior to the insolvency relationship between Nanosynth and Resolve. There may be an implied conflict of interest which needs to be investigated

Phrases like “under the radar” and “low profile” come to mind with this share. With West Coast gone, there are no institutional holders, leaving it subject to the whims and fantasies of small ‘investors’. There is a serious business here which may or may not sink without trace, tread water indefinitely or shoot the lights out. The major shareholder seems unconcerned about the share price in the short term, so shareholders will reasonably hope that he has a plan. Given his age one would have thought that some urgency might begin to influence his thinking…

Gallium can disrupt the lattice structure of aluminum, making the aluminum more friable and prone to reaction. But the gallium is chemically unchanged – it can be recovered from the aluminum in its elemental form. So if a patient was concerned after seeing a video like this, they could be assured that unless they are made of solid metal, gallium is incapable of “corrosion.” What about metal implants? Gallium only has the ability to disrupt the lattice of a few elements (aluminum, mercury, tin, a few others), none of which are commonly found in biomedical implants.

I could cook a tasty meal fit for a gourmet if I had ingredients - look at the RNS recipe I’ve written down - unfortunately the kitchen is empty and I can’t even feed the cat!

Shareholders threw out the only people capable of turning it around, stopped the essential for future development, fund raise through the clever warrants which the moronic, donkeys led by donkeys never understood and now six months later you see the results of your misguided and stupid actions

This thread is a study in denial for future psychological students. There is clearly no news of the machine, no mask sales, no liklehood of sales and even so, they are unable to support the dirty litle secret of a market cap of £16m - bonkers

But market cap of £20m, you’re having a laugh aren’t you. Éven real businesses making profits can be bought for half this price on AIM, but importanty this would be overpriced even at .05p