Member Info for moonwalk

We’ll never know for sure but shareholders probably threw out the only person capable of recovering the situation. The warrant hysteria was irrelevant to the problems which needed to be dealt with. The share price has continued to decline under the new board and let us pray things will soon get back on track. Lottohopes seems to have been a false prophet though, and where is the rascal hiding?

On the 11th January, the day of the announcement of Board changes, the share price was 3.05, and it traded above 2.5 for most of the following month. Braveheart received an average of 2.66 for its shares according to the RNS on the 18th November. It is now at 1.6. Lottohopes, Egremont - what did they do for you? Any holder here could have sold at around the same price Braveheart sold for over the weeks following 11th January but that you didn’t and why you didn’t would surely benefit from honest discussion?

I have watched the utter stupidity of the people here (or mostly bots probably - has anyone else noticed the regularity of posts, carefully spaced every two or three minutes throughout the day), about the warrants. The only gainers in getting the share price substantially above 2p are existing shareholders the same people who are allegedly voting against the warrants being issued. But only the fully loaded warrant holders have the power and motive to drive the price way above 2p......the Board are totally indifferent to the outcome, they are not shareholders and the share price is irrelevant to them - think about it

There used to be posts every couple of minutes by a boiler room operation. Now we’re down to 300 -400 posts a day and the volume of shares traded each day follows a similar trend. You (if there are any ‘you’ genuinely) will see how credible this view is by the moronic responses to my reasonable post.....

It is a little surprising that many here believe Gareth is aligned to the rest of the shareholders on warrants. His interest is to remain the sole shareholder with a significant holding. Worth some many millions of pounds. Thoughtful PIs might wonder there are zero other notifiable holders, but voting down the warrants allows Gareth to stay at 15 % and is otherwise immaterial to anyone else.

In the Braveheart 2020 accounts P2F is valued at £500k. Gareth‘s 48% would have been therefore been worth about £250k. It appears that even this valuation is after Braveheart put in a load of cash. So Gareth has gone from £250k to £8m in about 9 months...not that he paid anything for his shares in the first place...how many others here have a 32 bagger in RMS?

Gareth’s shareholding is worth more than £8 million pounds. Not bad for a business which he sold his share for around £1 million a few months ago. Many people have sought to present him as some kind of victim when the truth is vastly different. You are certainly not aligned with his interests

In the Braveheart 2020 accounts P2F is valued at £500k. Gareth‘s 48% would have been therefore been worth about £250k. It appears that even this valuation is after Braveheart put in a load of cash. So Gareth has gone from £250k to £8m in about 9 months...not that he paid anything for his shares in the first place...how many others here have a 32 bagger in RMS?

He would say that wouldn‘t he...

Gareth’s shareholding is worth more than £8 million pounds. Not bad for a business which he sold his share for around £1 million a few months ago. Many people have sought to present him as some kind of victim when the truth is vastly different. You are certainly not aligned with his interests

It is a little surprising that many here believe Gareth is aligned to the rest of the shareholders on warrants. His interest is to remain the sole shareholder with a significant holding. Worth some many millions of pounds. Thoughtful PIs might wonder there are zero other notifiable holders, but voting down the warrants allows Gareth to stay at 15 % and is otherwise immaterial to anyone else.

However its not all bad, if the warrants are exercised shareholders will benefit by having a further £8m cash on the balance sheet to invest in the businesses

About Right?

That’s not correct, what was the name and phone number of the person you claim to have spoken to?

That’s not correct

You are wrong about three days - read the RNSs and stop spreading self-serving mis-information

No mask has been certified - read the RNSs

No it hasn’t

Surely even if the machine had arrived and was fully commissioned and operational, not one mask could be made and sold because they are not yet certified?

Who wouldn’t