We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
Has anyone thought to ask how much money has been paid in various forms, to the Nanosynth CEO? This is a straightforward question with a factual answer and a not acceptable would be to refer questioners to the accounts
If they are all mates, to put it into simple language it is possible that the disposition of assets could be influenced by prior relationships
Do you really need me to draw you a diagram?
The key question to ask is, did anyone at Resolve, know Mark Duffin prior to the insolvency relationship between Nanosynth and Resolve. There may be an implied conflict of interest which needs to be investigated
Phrases like “under the radar” and “low profile” come to mind with this share. With West Coast gone, there are no institutional holders, leaving it subject to the whims and fantasies of small ‘investors’. There is a serious business here which may or may not sink without trace, tread water indefinitely or shoot the lights out. The major shareholder seems unconcerned about the share price in the short term, so shareholders will reasonably hope that he has a plan. Given his age one would have thought that some urgency might begin to influence his thinking…
Gallium can disrupt the lattice structure of aluminum, making the aluminum more friable and prone to reaction. But the gallium is chemically unchanged – it can be recovered from the aluminum in its elemental form. So if a patient was concerned after seeing a video like this, they could be assured that unless they are made of solid metal, gallium is incapable of “corrosion.” What about metal implants? Gallium only has the ability to disrupt the lattice of a few elements (aluminum, mercury, tin, a few others), none of which are commonly found in biomedical implants.
I could cook a tasty meal fit for a gourmet if I had ingredients - look at the RNS recipe I’ve written down - unfortunately the kitchen is empty and I can’t even feed the cat!
Shareholders threw out the only people capable of turning it around, stopped the essential for future development, fund raise through the clever warrants which the moronic, donkeys led by donkeys never understood and now six months later you see the results of your misguided and stupid actions
This thread is a study in denial for future psychological students. There is clearly no news of the machine, no mask sales, no liklehood of sales and even so, they are unable to support the dirty litle secret of a market cap of £16m - bonkers
But market cap of £20m, you’re having a laugh aren’t you. Éven real businesses making profits can be bought for half this price on AIM, but importanty this would be overpriced even at .05p
Market cap £21 million and masks no longer mandatory, timberrr!
The government spokesman has said no masks will be required after the 23rd July. The response here? Silence. No doubt the share price will be more eloquent
At £18 million market cap, for no sales and no sales forecast this company is indeed phenomenal. Why do the gambling punters here *never* refer to market cap or other fundamentals?
Attacking Gareth, is so misguided. He is the genius without which P2F would never exist. The problem here is that most shareholders remaining and bitterly posting, bought too high and are now under water through their own choices and decisions. The vast majority of shareholders bought low and sold high. There were literally months for shareholders to sell above 3p, which is even higher than the old BOD sold at in November there were weeks when every day more than 100m shares were traded. It was your decisions, not Gareth, not the 'old BOD' not even poor John Hall and his sidekick Antony that landed you where your are. Grow up!
is not friendly from this level…
But they want airtight masks
Punters had two months to sell above 2.7 after PR‘s sales in November at the same average Price. Punters threw out the rainmakers in January and the share price has steadily declined since.
2p would be £40m market cap - share with us how you arrive at that value. I won‘t ask about 3p £60m) because it is a typo?
Because they know nobody attends the meetings even though many threaten to
AGM the latest irrelevant distraction for punters, a few months ago it was the ridiculous and barely understood distraction of the warrants by the John/ Egremont circus. That ended well didn’t it. The only distraction you need is market cap is still an insane £20m and jo public will not be buying masks after July