Member Info for Moonson

Vince, the 🤡 hasn’t got anyone filtered. Someone with such an ego and a sense of self importance could not bear to be ignorant to what is potentially being said about them.

Actually it really is very sad that they feel the need to constantly post. Must be very lonely

How do you know? You’ve claimed to have filtered about 90% of the board participants. You really are a 🤡

Quite frankly, based on the boards past performance on providing accurate forecasts, I don’t particularly trust anything they say. Let’s see if they can start to become more credible with the new boss.

Yes, it’s called Hedging

@wolves The many slapped wrist and $millions in fines would suggest that the big institutions are not that worried about regulatory or reputational risk.

Does anyone know what will happen if there just aren't the shares available to satisfy the block purchase in 2 weeks time?

does the share-price rise to the level that satisfies selling? We know that dropping the share-price doesn't work.

Another pointless post Hottie!

I do hope you attend the AGM and expound on your disappointment directly to the board members in person.

I’m sure that would be more productive than stating the blinding obvious to fellow shareholders

True, but that was when he was CEO. The communication strategy may have now changed, and may be different in the future when the new CEO is at the helm.

Why is everything so black and white with you Hottie???

But in all honesty, we are but mushrooms and so will find out when we get some official comms from the company.

How would you know? You’ve only been a member since May 2023🤣

Oh yes, different account before then. 🤡

The current burn rate is. Likely to be the fixed costs of salaries and office etc.

the thing that will increase the burn rate are additional resources and any spend related to projects such as new MMU etc.

Mid 2026. But with additional headcount, especially with an expensive CEO (until revenue comes in) then the money will run out sooner.

For goodness sake, grow up!

No-one on here has any influence on anything. If someone is daft enough to take anonymous posters “advice” then more fool them🤡

“Other shipping companies aren't going to be sat around for the next 3 years watching MSC and QED play footsie under the table. They'll be exploring their own options”

This maybe related to JM statement that they were in discussions with other shipping companies

Is that your Swansong??

About time you just swanned off.

🤡

Snap!!!

Surely the board must realise that they’ve now run out of opportunities to sell any fund raising on the back of positive but rather empty statements. In order to raise any future funds from shareholders must be accompanied by tangible progress and not like last time.

Although, I suspect they will still give away a significant portion of the company. It really is time they stepped up and actually delivered something other than a positive trial which we’ve had plenty, as referenced in earlier posts.

I thought the Sparkle trial potentially opens up a much larger power opportunity with the owner as they have a much larger operation in Honduras. This would make the share price much higher

Indeed, but that is not on QED. The responsibility for ensuring higher support rests with MSC sponsors to make the case. QED will support that as necessary but they can’t drive it.

Sparkle will get its own RNS when the results are published.

The RNS today is what everyone has been calling for, communication from the company. It’s not what we wanted to hear, (progress is non existent with the exception to Sparkle) so be careful what you wish for!!!

Looking at the buys coming in, some appear to be quite content with the update!

Engineers would not be authorised to sign a binding agreement!!!