Perspective on Winx13 Mar 2019 10:20
Taking the time to consider the actual impact on us, the cost to us is less than perhaps people are assuming.
The total cost to us at the start was estimated at $6.4m. This included our share of a $3m performance bond ($1.2m), refundable if the well was drilled by 30th May. That's happened, so our share is reduced to $5.2m after the refund comes in.
Abandoning the well early and not staying into April for flow testing has probably reduced the costs. I've no idea by how much, but assuming it puts our cost at less than $5m. Converting to Β£'s, puts our costs at under Β£3.8m.
Also considering what Winx would have resulted in after a successful flow test, possibilities could have included a sale or going into production. A sale would not have happened overnight, could have taken many months, if not years to find someone who wanted to buy it and negotiate the price. Going into production would have cost a large amount of cash which we don't have, and probably have taken 4+ years.
And I just don't see how this effects the farm out negotiations. Any oil company with the resources to develop Icewine will have had their fair share of unsuccessful wells, and will be fully aware that not every well is successful no matter how good the data is. This result today will not be anything unusual to them. As some of the oil experts have said here before, if the oil industry knew exactly where to drill they wouldn't bother with test wells.
The biggest impact therefore is on investors confidence, not financial, and not reputation with other oil companies.
So net result is we've not gained anything, but at the most we've lost Β£3.8m on it.
All things considered, today is a disappointment, but not a complete disaster that's going to ruin us.