Member Info for milnrowmug

Not even sure what this title means; mis-type for "Too close to the truth perhaps"? If so, what is?

So much for Artificial Intelligence.

Sprea, by picking your dates you could have several %s, up or down. We each have our own real %s.

Cluel, they are almost opposites, since a squid needs to be damp to stay alive while squibs need to be fairly dry. Curious confusion.

Getup, that will have been this morning, when we were 6% up?

Never mind: it falls, it rises, it's a sp.

Realistically, carbon is carbon, same excise rate road or not. But politicians are crooks, so expect anything/nothing.

Stretton lovely, pretty hills to walk lacking the challenge of Snowdon.

Balls in 2 syllables.

no heid, stuffed + yourself. if you must make dumb predictions (as any would be) then you must stand by them, the obloquy is rightly all yours. my comments might be bland, but i try to avoid *******s.

212 etc. is my best guess, people trade tiny amounts because they can afford to.

Watch, it is an old joke that freight in a ship is a cargo, while if it went by car it would be a shipment.

Zim is landlocked, railways are creaky, some roads are worse. When respectable, or, who knows, fantastic, production is achieved; this may not be the end of all problems. Still, direction good, one step at a time!

Marky, only one year? However, despite ggr's record, imo 1p+ easily achievable. Gla.

GP & Heid, I could never see the relevance of buying royalty for a exploration development and extraction company, but hey!, if it brings in that sort of cash, ok by me.

Gezza, today, agree with your overseas point; but it attracted all the sad old political drones; BORING, & not really ujo.

Anyon, certainly wouldn't be overpaying now.

Heid, not exactly. The shares held in treasury represent a paper loss. If they had just been retired/deleted no loss; the company would now be divided by fewer shares.

Alham, you are a bit new on prem. Also, if acker suffers insobriety, try following the wiles and ways of ggr all these years, and see where it leaves you!

Wulli ok they have 17.4% not 30%, so far. Any reason they won't get 30, on the way to 100?

Snooz please accept all new arrivals on BBs are treated with extra suspicion. Why do they have no history? Are they hiding a history, which would reveal obsessive de/ramping? Back in the day something like happened to me.

MrsW probably wrong, Heid probably right, this time, imo wn is a good value bet, not a multimilion certainty. I hope we just get the (huge) gas to grid, not the Wressle burn experience.

JB I don't want more, think current % just right. Hoping other partners happy therewith

Persi yes, and I apologise for encouraging her/im yet further.

Heid, agree with dividend. Bisc, bring it on! As to tac, posters once claimed you were connected, or one and the same. Maybe he was a specialised parody bot.

Buying at 19.9p you have improved on my lowest average, but not my lowest recent buy, 19.3p. I have quite a chunk, more than I usually allow myself, so no more just yet. When recent sp varies from 11p to 53p, clearly money is to be made by the patient (or lost by impatient©).

The evidence of new investors is not overwhelming. (Yet, anyway.)

I wanted real buybacks to redress the last, as-it-happened unnecessary, placing: to re-concentrate share value. Any remaining profit is ours anyway, so why not dividend?

Wot a complete pr, Gor blimey!

Not 100% agreement chitty. Yes, a company exists to invest, work, and profit. If optimal profitable prospects arise let's take them. However sub-optimal prospects for their own sake are worse than divi &/or real buy-backs imo. Time will tell what the value of current plans have been. There are still Biscathorpe & wn, albeit at a snail's pace. Maybe Fiskerton work too?

So, now it is. Tomorrow's another day.

Looks fairly secure to me, already.