Member Info for milnrowmug

Well substantial if not quite total, I do have reason to be positive here, you think otherwise? (clearly.) More cash to buy at today's price? Well I'll look down the sofa but I don't want to have everything in one investment, one makes sensible rules, then needs to stick to them. If I can't buy more for less, I surely don't expect to starve. Good look, and keep vigilant for total ramps.

No, imo, the disbelievers can ***koff right now, might be able to buy more for less.

How relevant is this; not reported however?

Fuse, many respect his opinions, and he does seem to have sources of information most of us lack. I'm sceptical, but anything from what we have now is a plus.

, so nobody will whinge they couldn't buy enough.

Further odd movements, according to LonSouE's graph.

A sudden rapid rise, halting equally suddenly. Bit rum, no idea what's behind it.

Must be true, on twatter.

No idea m8.

In fact, with 200:1, should it be a £2 party?

Maybe the happy medium approach, slice some, hold most. Not every multibag prospect happens, and some come out of the blue, daytime RNSs, etc..

Frankly my dears, who gives a damn?

Good article thanks for post. As for "exploitative" I think locals will do rather better than in the extraction of diamonds and gold. As for being a justifier of colonialism, would things have been better without Cecil; the field left open to Belgians, Dutch & Boche? Would they have been better without Ian Smith? Truly, sorr, if I was going to Dublin I wouldn't start here.

Why did she say light mineral, rather than light metal. The rock is heavy, but you can still balance it on your head. Speaking of whom, if we're still doomed, he is the reason.

This apparent (or real?) P&D has allowed me to enlarge my holding without throwing further cash in. If only there was a shaft or working incline into which to throw it. So I'm still somewhat upbeat. GLAck&All.

Almost, but not quite as I recall. Still, don't stop; yesterday's gone.

A,Coold, you define investing as putting your money where profit is but a distant prospect?

Thanx4 link. Of course, if they don't want explorers to succeed, they shouldn't issue the licences in the first place, just too greedy for fees (& brown envelopes). Ecology, environment, the planet, whatever you call it; is too precious to leave in the hands of politicians. Can we reconcile that with true democracy?

Funny thing, you're the 2nd 212 complaint I've read this evening.

If so many, why only 20%? Twittertwatters, can't abide them.

Don't wonder, know.

Perhaps we should be glad our dosh isn't being squandered on a real one. If any remains.