RE: latest podcast #KAV7 Mar 2022 16:04
Jay, I agree that some positive assays would be useful. However, we need to be very careful about what counts as positive in this context. We already know we haven’t intersected a massive sulphide target with these drills, so there’s no point approaching these assays hoping for high percentages of copper or nickel. Indeed, Keith was suggesting recently that it might be positive to see low proportions of sulphides in the top layers of Proterozoic gabbro. Any assessment of whether these assays are positive or not is only going to be possible with the benefit of the geos’ opinions