RE: Bbi validating15 Dec 2020 23:02
Kong - it is understandable he talks with great enthusiasm about the company he founded. I suspect in the early stage he never expected the valuation to take off as quickly as it did, and has been under pressure since. He did the right thing raising capital it was too good an opportunity to not do it. But i am sorry he has at no point reasonably communicated the realistic chances of success. Everything has been talked about as a shoo in.
Your questions:
Again I take on board some of what you say but if you are seriously against this share why do you own shares in the company ? I do not own shares and have never held a position long or short. It's on my watch list and i have researched it probably much more than most people that post here
If you don’t, why do you come on here to be so antagonistic towards shareholders . I have no interest in being friend or foe, only calling it how i see it.
What is your reason behind your comments ? I dont believe the balance of risk/reward is fair here. I see far too much mistruths and i am entitled to add my opinion.
Why does it matter to you if the share price collapses ? Personally it does not impact me. I dont want to see other PIs lose money based on failed promises of CEOs. We have all been there. I wish i had listened to counter arguments in other stocks in the past.
And why does it matter if it risers several fold if you don’t own any shares ? It doesn't matter i will genuinely be happy for you if it happens but the chances of this are much much lower than the general comment on here would have you beleive.
The simple fact is this company have no track record of diagnostics devices used in real life, yet the single largest commercial opportunity comes along and they have you believing that they are going to lead the world when every expert scientist in diagnostics with years of proven success are working towards the same goal.
Take it or leave it filter me if you like or dont like