RE: EME is btoke1 Sep 2025 16:01
Piper scaremongering again.
Would lenders call in the loan to gain stake of Mako themselves?
The structure of EME’s Convertible Loan Note (CLN) makes it unlikely that the lenders would call the loan immediately, for these reasons:
⸻
1️⃣ Repayment Tied to Sale Proceeds
• The May 2023 CLN amendment explicitly links repayment to proceeds from the sale of EME’s 8.5% Mako stake.
• That means the lender’s primary method of recovering funds is through the sale of the stake, not by forcing cash repayment from EME’s other resources.
• Since Mako is the only major monetizable asset, lenders cannot practically demand repayment from EME’s cash reserves, because there is little or no other liquidity.
⸻
2️⃣ Lender Options
• Forced Sale / Accelerated Sale:
The lender can require that EME completes the sale faster. They don’t automatically take ownership of the stake; they enforce the CLN’s security to ensure repayment.
• Seizure / Ownership Transfer:
If EME fails to comply with repayment obligations, the lender could enforce their first-ranking security over the Mako interest. This would legally transfer control of the stake to the lender, who could then sell it to a third party.
⸻
3️⃣ Practical Likelihood
• Given that repayment is tied to Mako proceeds, calling the loan early doesn’t provide an advantage unless the lender expects a distressed situation that would allow them to get the stake below market value.
• If the lender calls the loan now, they may pressure EME into a rushed or distressed sale, but the loan amendments appear designed to protect both sides until a formal farm-down or sale is completed.