Member Info for MCNol

The big 7.5M and 9.6M trades weren't just random market noise; they were Systematic Internaliser (SINT) trades.

Institutional buyers are "cornering" the stock in the dark (SINT) before the public (AIMX) fully realizes the supply has vanished.

When the SINT buying stops and those buyers move to the public AIMX book to finish their orders, that’s usually when you see a parabolic "squeeze."

The 'dead cat' just bought another 9.6 million shares at 10:04 AM. That’s 17 million shares in two blocks alone. MMs don't keep 10-million-share 'selling' blocks on their books during a 10% intraday rise unless they want to go bankrupt. This is textbook institutional consolidation...

A 7.5M share print at the day's high isn't a 'dead cat,' it’s a whale swallowing the supply. If it were a dump, the price wouldn't be climbing from 0.58 to 0.62 on massive volume. You're mistaking institutional accumulation for a funeral—the only thing 'dead' here is the sell-side liquidity....

Technical analysis dictates that a breakout is only "real" if it is accompanied by high volume. The data supports this..

At 9:53:57 AM, a 1,000,000 share block was bought at 0.6113.

At 9:55:32 AM, another 805,162 shares were taken at 0.62.

When you see million-share blocks being bought at higher prices (0.61 vs 0.58), it signals High Conviction. The buyer is willing to pay a premium to ensure they corner the remaining supply...

You do have an active imagination I will say that....

Maybe re-asses your CFD betting strategy...(or your life choices)...

Oscar you are desperate, just relax...

Isn't it interesting, we have lots of new accounts who have never posted here before suddenly telling people it is all going to hell in a hand basket?

@Blubay this behaviour...buying more on strength and less on a downward slide...is a risk management strategy designed to build a large position without driving the price against themselves in a thin, falling market....

@Blubay (sigh)...the suggestion that we are seeing 'distribution' at weekly low reflects a fundamental misunderstanding of market cycles; institutional 'Smart Money' distributes at the top of a rally to late-coming retail, whereas they accumulate at the bottom from panicking hands. To claim otherwise is to confuse the exit of a few with the entry of the many...

@LegendB that's factually incorrect. Institutional investors don't log in to a retail app, but their shares frequently sit within Hargreaves Lansdown Nominees Limited. This is a legal entity that holds legal title for billions in assets, often using 'Omnibus' accounts...

On the public Shareholder Register, the company doesn't see 'Fund X' or 'Retail Joe'—it sees the Nominee. Mid-tier funds and wealth managers often use these exact same nominee structures to stay 'under the radar,' pooling their 2.9% holdings so they remain invisible to the public while still being institutional 'Whales.' It's standard market mechanics...

Depending on the jurisdiction of the issuer (HE1 is BVI incorporated) and the specific nature of the instrument, some complex swaps can be structured to avoid immediate aggregation with physical holdings, though this is becoming harder under modern transparency rules.

Large asset managers often have several independent "pots" or legal entities.

If a parent company has three different sub-funds, and each fund buys 2.9% of the company, the parent might manage 8.7% total.

Unless those funds are deemed to be "acting in concert" or the parent company has "aggregated voting rights" that cross the 3% mark, they can sometimes avoid a single consolidated TR1.

An institution approaching the 3% mark can "lend" their shares to a third party (like a market maker or a hedge fund).

Institutional "Whales" often hide their size within massive nominee accounts (e.g., Hargreaves Lansdown Nominees).

Method: Because the nominee account itself might hold 15% of the company for thousands of different clients, the specific 2.9% holding of one "Whale" is mathematically invisible to the public. Only the company can see the underlying holders. HL currently hold 22% in their HE1 nominee account...

Off-Book / SINT: ~21.2m shares (~71% of total volume)

AIMX (Retail/On-Book): ~8.6m shares (~29% of total volume)

Every time retail tries to push the price down, a 3-million-share block appears to catch it...

For those who like to watch this have a look at the Trade Ratio..

Off-Book / SINT: ~10.4m shares (72% of session volume)

AIMX (Retail/On-Book): ~4m shares (28% of session volume)

The retail "AIMX" trades are currently just the noise between the gears of these institutional machines....

Oh dear, I fear Oscar has no clue whether he is right or wrong...

To answer the question...

The institution(s) (that started building last Thursday) are now defending their average...

They bought early at 0.50s (last Thursday).

They topped up at 0.80s (Monday).

They "doubled down" at 0.58 (Yesterday).

By pushing the price to 0.62 this morning (the MREX breach we just saw), they are moving the stock back into "profit" for their total combined position....

I think she is what she stated when posting as 'PickyLynn" a book keeper working from home and has LSE Chat on all day ( like most of us who trade and invest do in order to gauge sentiment). Her constant FUD is irritating however as are her fixations on certain posters here.

@Punter1234 your views on @CrustyPete seem harsh...I will say that my representative at the 2024 AGM thought he was a sophisticated retail investor...

Recent remarks demonstrate a surprising unfamiliarity with standard market mechanics, notably the definitions of temporal support 'floors' and institutional 'whale' activity. This apparent gap in foundational knowledge raises questions as to whether this is a deliberate obfuscation of the facts or a genuine misrepresentation of his market acumen at the AGM...

Who do you think is selling this massive volume Blubay? Could it be the stub of 200-300m shares held by the CLN being sold at 200-300% profit?

Just stop with the FUD, it really is tedious, I am certain I am not alone in that opinion...I would filter you but I like to keep any eye on my Stalkers...

Oscar1276, there is a filter button use it...

Blubay, give a rest Luv, it does get tedious...