The latest Investing Matters Podcast with Jean Roche, Co-Manager of Schroder UK Mid Cap Investment Trust has just been released. Listen here.
Can you believe that?
Here we go with your 3-6 posts '1 month old dodge account' you won't last long here, believe me.... Spreading FUD - fear uncertainty and doubt - over the bulk underground, because that's essentially the only unknown left that such disingenuous posts can target.
Last year we had months and months of tecnhical FUD with the GreenTool and others - who said Havieron would never be economic... but here we are 12 months later with a gigantic starter deposit, a $50m decline going in, and $50m GGP cash funding to DFS, and a published phase 1 mine PFS to take to the bank ... so NCM can get ore to Telfer ASAP.
You may be able to confuse and scare the un-researched with your manipulation, but you cannot touch Bamps or me.
For the rest of you MrBig is a skilled and devious operator who last night was attempting to exploit an ostensibly clever argument. The posts were subsequently removed this am. For the correct reasons.
What he/she was trying to do last night was apply NCM's conservative, underground stoping phase 1 mine operational costs @ $84/tonne - actually $81/tonne according to GGP using the correct exchange rate to Bulk Underground production.
The first Stoping operation has naturally has lower volumes, due to the inherent volume limitations of the Stoping technique and higher costs - ore transport to surface limitation, requirement for drill and blast / explosives, and extra material handling, and subsequence labour in back pasting costs )
But you cannot apply this to the anticipated Bulk under ground block caving grades of the larger scale deposit where the cost per tonne would be circa $25-27/tonne
This is a totally and fundamentally inappropriate comparison made by BiggL - It's like comparing two completely different company cost structures, AND specifically designed to imply that anything under 1.5g is likely to be 'uneconomic'...
And It's total BS becuase we ALL know that Cadia is economic down to 0.4g/t Au... specifically due the bulk efficiencies of the operational costs.
And very much like comparing and interweaving the cost structure of building Ferraris directly to Ford Fiestas -
IE both make massive profits, BUT in TOTALLY different ways . Obviously You cannot make a profit building Ford fiestas in the way you build a Ferrari though. That would be loss making.
That's the best analogy I can come up with. And that is the tactic of this poster. Always Happy to smash them into touch.
Expect Multiple shorter accounts with a very obvious agenda.s
Regarding bulk underground : The only question is will this be a block cave or a more selective sub level cave...? Anyone with mining nouse can see that.. The grade in those breccia are nothing short of sensational. And a mine in their own right.
Careful Bananas75.
Wouldn't be surprised if you're post disappears.
"I want the whole team on this, it's now getting out of hand!
"don't worry boss, novelty will wear off soon, all back to normal tomorrow"
Me thinks not!
16 years old, bored in the classroom, tapping my pencil in frustration that Claire, sat 2 desks away from me had turned down my offer of a date.
Miss Gorgeous, our history teacher, finally snapped.
"Max, yes you Max, how would you like it if I kept banging you on the desk?"
For Hydro, Bamps and Paddy and all those who I have failed to mention;
Here we go with your 3-6 posts '1 month old dodge account' you won't last long here, believe me.... Spreading FUD - fear uncertainty and doubt - over the bulk underground, because that's essentially the only unknown left that such disingenuous posts can target.
Last year we had months and months of tecnhical FUD with the GreenTool and others - who said Havieron would never be economic... but here we are 12 months later with a gigantic starter deposit, a $50m decline going in, and $50m GGP cash funding to DFS, and a published phase 1 mine PFS to take to the bank ... so NCM can get ore to Telfer ASAP.
You may be able to confuse and scare the un-researched with your manipulation, but you cannot touch Bamps or me.
For the rest of you MrBig is a skilled and devious operator who last night was attempting to exploit an ostensibly clever argument. The posts were subsequently removed this am. For the correct reasons.
What he/she was trying to do last night was apply NCM's conservative, underground stoping phase 1 mine operational costs @ $84/tonne - actually $81/tonne according to GGP using the correct exchange rate to Bulk Underground production.
The first Stoping operation has naturally has lower volumes, due to the inherent volume limitations of the Stoping technique and higher costs - ore transport to surface limitation, requirement for drill and blast / explosives, and extra material handling, and subsequence labour in back pasting costs )
But you cannot apply this to the anticipated Bulk under ground block caving grades of the larger scale deposit where the cost per tonne would be circa $25-27/tonne
This is a totally and fundamentally inappropriate comparison made by BiggL - It's like comparing two completely different company cost structures, AND specifically designed to imply that anything under 1.5g is likely to be 'uneconomic'...
And It's total BS becuase we ALL know that Cadia is economic down to 0.4g/t Au... specifically due the bulk efficiencies of the operational costs.
And very much like comparing and interweaving the cost structure of building Ferraris directly to Ford Fiestas -
IE both make massive profits, BUT in TOTALLY different ways . Obviously You cannot make a profit building Ford fiestas in the way you build a Ferrari though. That would be loss making.
That's the best analogy I can come up with. And that is the tactic of this poster. Always Happy to smash them into touch.
Expect Multiple shorter accounts with a very obvious agenda.s
Regarding bulk underground : The only question is will this be a block cave or a more selective sub level cave...? A
... ooh think of the overtime!
Seems to be working; some moron just tried to besmirch TomE, not for the first time. His post disappeared quicker than my wife when I start alluding to an early night!
Oh, and by the way;
Here we go with your 3-6 posts '1 month old dodge account' you won't last long here, believe me.... Spreading FUD - fear uncertainty and doubt - over the bulk underground, because that's essentially the only unknown left that such disingenuous posts can target.
Last year we had months and months of tecnhical FUD with the GreenTool and others - who said Havieron would never be economic... but here we are 12 months later with a gigantic starter deposit, a $50m decline going in, and $50m GGP cash funding to DFS, and a published phase 1 mine PFS to take to the bank ... so NCM can get ore to Telfer ASAP.
You may be able to confuse and scare the un-researched with your manipulation, but you cannot touch Bamps or me.
For the rest of you MrBig is a skilled and devious operator who last night was attempting to exploit an ostensibly clever argument. The posts were subsequently removed this am. For the correct reasons.
What he/she was trying to do last night was apply NCM's conservative, underground stoping phase 1 mine operational costs @ $84/tonne - actually $81/tonne according to GGP using the correct exchange rate to Bulk Underground production.
The first Stoping operation has naturally has lower volumes, due to the inherent volume limitations of the Stoping technique and higher costs - ore transport to surface limitation, requirement for drill and blast / explosives, and extra material handling, and subsequence labour in back pasting costs )
But you cannot apply this to the anticipated Bulk under ground block caving grades of the larger scale deposit where the cost per tonne would be circa $25-27/tonne
This is a totally and fundamentally inappropriate comparison made by BiggL - It's like comparing two completely different company cost structures, AND specifically designed to imply that anything under 1.5g is likely to be 'uneconomic'...
And It's total BS becuase we ALL know that Cadia is economic down to 0.4g/t Au... specifically due the bulk efficiencies of the operational costs.
And very much like comparing and interweaving the cost structure of building Ferraris directly to Ford Fiestas -
IE both make massive profits, BUT in TOTALLY different ways . Obviously You cannot make a profit building Ford fiestas in the way you build a Ferrari though. That would be loss making.
That's the best analogy I can come up with. And that is the tactic of this poster. Always Happy to smash them into touch.
Expect Multiple shorter accounts with a very obvious agenda.s
Regarding bulk underground : The only question is will this be a block cave or a more selective sub level cave...? Anyone with mining nouse can see that.. The grade in those breccia are nothing short of sensational. And a mine in their own right.
Shady, yes SD did indeed take on CG, he has worked with them before, they have an outstanding track record, they don't "run with the flow" they have been contributing to numerous companies growth for many many years
Dodge, well said.
Red
"I have just binned you"
As I recall, you "binned" me yesterday?
I did welcome Cella, might I suggest you google "irony"?
I can't understand why you see fit to continually attack me.
On the 9th March Hannam set a target price of 33p for GGP (did the intern assigned with a speculative AIM stock, take a leap of faith ?).
19th April Scallywag results were announced.
29 April – target price 26p - a drop, a huge drop, of 21% (intern shown the door and told not to show his face again).
Internship development manager sacked?
Big question mark where Hannam's are concerned, in my view of course!
Cella, welcome to GGP board and thank you for your view. Breath of fresh air!
lebuge-addick,
Questionable as to why GGP got involved with a relatively new investment bank.
In my opinion, GGP should dump then asap.
Haveagoodday,
I hope new and recent holders take notice - wise words indeed!
GGP is not a short term gain; 2 to 3 years and serious profits will be made by all (should GGP be the subject of a takeover, profits will be made by all too, hopefully).
Redirons.
You English guys confuse me.
I don't want to offend anyone so I shall post no further.
I came across this site quite by accident. I searched for LSE (London Stock Exchange)
Good Bye.
Redirons, wrong.
It would be crass of me to detail my holding in GGP, but I am very confident it equates to a hell of a lot more than you are holding.
Tymers.
where on earth did the 9.6 billion come from?
Redirons, apologies, trying to decipher what you said.
Soundofsilence. yes on-board with those views. But fact is, until there is "income" on the balance sheet, there will be no "big players" joining the party.
CastleT
"IMHO...So it seems the SP is somewhat manipulated and kept a lid on" Correct.
"On any given day a group of traders appear and deramp the share price. Why?" Traders most certainly do not have the time nor inclination to waste time on LSE.
"Maybe they are working for a large institution or a potential suitor of GGP...before a low ball offer." 800 watchers, amateur watchers!
"Whoever they are they clearly have access to a massive volume of shares that can control the SP up, down or keep it in check." Correct, but in no way connected to anything mentioned on this board!
Redirons.
"Sorry Tatty but that accounts for all juniors/start ups of which Aim is crammed full of"
I do concede Red.
Speed reading and all that!
Tatty99.
Yes, you are correct in this instance. GGP SP is being held back.
I think we all know why?
TonyK747 is also correct.
Redirons, is not strictly correct when making reference to "all AIM" because not all AIM has what GGP has.
But yes sit tight, if you can. It will be at least a year, but SP will grow,
Cheers Midnight.
Sorry to say, but the majority don't want to see what I see.
A non UK based buyer is building a substantial hold.
Why? I think I know.
Bear in mind, until an order is completed in full (as in I want to buy 2.5 billion) no declaration has to be made to the exchange until that order has been completed in full.
My point - Vultures are hovering. Is Greatland the target? Absolutely no.
Newcrest is the target.
All in my opinion of course!