Member Info for Mattyboy-

'The vesting of the warrants is subject to acceleration in certain limited circumstances (including a change of control of the Company or a sale of certain parts of the Group).'

https://www.sharesmagazine.co.uk/news/shares/what-micro-focus-amazon-aws-deal-means-for-investors

bountyhunter.......I'm sorry but are you saying that you were aware of the following? I'm fairly sure this was not in the public domain.
From the RNS ;

'In conjunction with the entry into the commercial agreement, Micro Focus has issued warrants to Amazon NV Investment Holdings LLC to subscribe for up to 15,924,384 ordinary shares in Micro Focus (the "warrants") at 446.60 pence per share.

The vesting of the warrants generally depends on the level of software revenues generated by AWS for Micro Focus under the commercial agreement over the multi-year term, according to revenue targets set out in the agreement. Full vesting of the warrants requires the commercial agreement to deliver a material impact on both AMC and total Group revenues.

The vesting of the warrants is subject to acceleration in certain limited circumstances (including a change of control of the Company or a sale of certain parts of the Group). The warrants are exercisable at any time following vesting until the 10th anniversary of the date of the warrant instrument (except in limited circumstances).'

Yes 2015.
Read it and you might understand a little background to what is going on here.
Samsung, Dow, Hansol and Nanoco.
It’s all here if you care to do a little research.
You get people like Scamp rock up with his ‘little punt’ and proclaiming Nanoco have zero chance because of Samsung’s ‘hard earned reputation’!!!!
Just unbelievable.
This is one of the best LSE boards for research and info, most of the posters have been here many years and know the intracacies of the IP infringement case.
Do yourselves a favour and scroll back and read thru the posts.
Mintz have pressure tested the litigation against Samsung and committed £10million to our cause. They are highly experienced IP infringement specialists and if they commit that kind of cash then rest assured there is a pretty good chance of success.

http://m.koreatimes.co.kr/pages/article.asp?newsIdx=176411

http://m.koreatimes.co.kr/pages/article.asp?newsIdx=176411Have a read Scamp. You may get a broader understanding of Korean corruption.

Scamp....what are your thoughts on Hansol and their rapid transformation from toilet paper specialist to CFQD producer?

...aka Clemoc who called MCRO ‘the best short in the City’ at 200 lmao.
Now 500 and still here bleating cos he got it SO wrong.

AWS have taken a stake and will be funnelling minimum £300m revenue our way but could be ‘considerably higher’.
Revenue decline instant reversal to growth.
Institutions will be discussing taking positions.
Our business and it’s software offerings fully vindicated and rubber stamped.
THE recovery stock to be in.

So right Noddi...hard to comprehend the enormous scale of opportunity this affords us.
This has transformed our business and confidence in it.

Great post Molly.

Hopefully the fact that Amazon have taken a stake will now transform our PE rating. x5 to ??.

Amazon have a vested interest in our success.

It really doesn’t get any better than that.

Insti’s will be in on this now big time.
If you could pick any company in the world to collaborate with....

This should reverse any further concerns regarding growth. A real shot in the arm.

Didn't take long for Calamity Chriss to turn up.

Someone asked the other day what event could trigger a re-rate.....how about an Amazon partnership?

Could pave the way to Amazon buy out.

Game changer.
We have just boarded the gravy train destination Boomtown.

The Law is the Law.

It applies to everyone no matter how big the company.

Scamp....‘Samsung’s hard earned reputation’ ??????

Are you shi**ing me?
You need to do a little research my friend.Get onto Google. Type in Samsung and then IP infringement.After that check out Samsung executives and jail sentences.

Flabbergasted.

Samsung’s defence rests on the validity of the patents.
Markman will be pivotal.

12 months ago we were at £10.
In that 12 months we have reduced debt,reduced revenue decline,reinstated divi,reduced costs and progressed internal systems integration.
Re-rate due.