Member Info for Mattyboy-

I hold £380k. £40k in ISA and £340k across a couple of SIPPs. Main SiPP 250% up.
Haven’t sold a share. Not going to.

Grezz…Tenner has covered the distribution to a degree although not down to precise percentages.
Varies according to the size of damage award.

PTAB won 47-0
Trial to be based on ‘our’ definition of an MCC
Potential ‘SP transformative’ damages…I quote BT
STMicro and ‘Eastern chemical company’ news imminent
6 other potential customers
Runcorn in preparation for production

Apart from that not much going on.

STMicro news pre-trial/settlement would be the cherry on my iced bun.

Can’t even get your put downs right Steve.

Yawn.

And you’d know ford.

The bulk of any court award will be based on historic sales.

The patents are running out.

The bulk of any court award will be historic sales.

The patents are running out.

Hawi…the decisions of the PTAB board have no effect on infringement , they merely acted as an enabler as such, without which there would be no infringement case.
Our patents are valid is where we are.

Question is how long has the mediation been going on?
If this is the first session then I don’t think anyone could realistically expect a settlement and a suspension meaningless.
If this is the latest session of a series of meetings then maybe we could be closer to an agreement.’Suspension’ takes on a different context.
A global settlement is not going to be reached in a ‘session’ if indeed that is where this is heading.

But what do any of ‘us’ know….I mean I don’t read books,none of my friends have multiple degrees and I don’t mix with polymaths,authors or well known broadcasters.
Thank God for Nigwit or what ever his user name is today.
: )

If you lot are ok being treated with such utter disdain then you roll over and take it.
Such shocking self aggrandisement needs calling out.

“Also most of the legal commentary
is pointless because no-one knows what they’re talking about except a handful of patent lawyers.”

And you now it seems.
Did you read a book on IP litigation between when you posted the above yesterday and today?

Breathtaking over-estimation of yourself.

Samsung had a window of opportunity to buy Nanoco, they passed on that and that window was closed.
They assumed we’d wither away and be unable to fund fighting their theft of our IP.
Wrong.
Now they are going to have to pay for what Tenner describes as jilting us at the altar.
Not long now.

Just stick 'roy weinstein samsung' into Google and there is a list of attempts to remove Roy's testimony by Samsung.
This has been discussed previously.

15 posts and you’re talking about creative accountancy and Enron?

Filtered.

How exactly are we not going to know the cash element of a damages award ?

If you're talking about telling stories then you're on the right board.

First trading update would reveal all.

BBD…” We need to think about what would be an acceptable settlement for Samsung too”

My point is that we don’t.We don’t have to think about that at all. Just what is acceptable to us.

Hope this isn’t too bleeding obvious.

If Samsung don't offer what Nanoco perceive to be a fair settlement then the courtroom awaits and a potential award against them the quantum of which is beyond their control.
It's all going to unfold in the next 12 weeks.