RE: New docket22 Sep 2022 08:07
" Nanoco should be precluded from relying on or referencing total sales revenue derived from Samsung’s TVs, displays, and monitors.
The MIL was GRANTED with regard to the total sales of the accused products—$7,188,426,411—but DENIED with respect to end-product sales prices"
Can somebody define and attribute a value to "end-product sales prices" as opposed to $7.2B "total sales of products"?