Member Info for MassiveRay

If everyone keeps reporting chabols disruptive behaviour then they might filly put and end to him I've already had him suspended once. I believe its not his only suspension so he's teetering on the end if he continues

Perhaps you actually dont understand how arbitration functions cbs, if you believe arbitration is "dead and abandoned" - it quite frankly is far from dead or even abandoned.

The narrative that “arbitration was dead” or that “the defendants completely rejected arbitration” is not actually supported by the publicly disclosed facts.

The company itself previously confirmed:

mediation took place,

settlement discussions progressed materially,

and a formal settlement agreement was expected.

They even disclosed specific contemplated terms including:

return of US$800k cash,

return of 58.8m shares,

and an additional operational cost contribution.

That clearly demonstrates that:

both sides were actively engaged in negotiation at one stage, not that arbitration or settlement avenues had simply been abandoned from the outset.

The more plausible interpretation from the currently available information is:

negotiations progressed significantly,

settlement discussions later broke down,

the dispute evolved and escalated,

and court proceedings subsequently followed.

Now the defendants themselves are applying for a stay back toward arbitration mechanisms, which further confirms arbitration rights and procedures are still very much alive within the dispute.

So the suggestion that: “they abandoned arbitration because they had no case” remains speculative opinion, not an established fact from the publicly available record.

You’re presenting the transformation of Angra as if GST’s objective was simply to preserve a tiny profitable payments processor exactly as it existed in 2021. It clearly wasn’t.

A small 14-person business doing ~£469k revenue and ~£165k profit is not some untouchable fintech masterpiece. Those profits existed before:

MiCA,

crypto infrastructure ambitions,

cross-border compliance expansion,

EMI scaling requirements,

and institutional regulatory buildout costs.

The reason costs increased is because GST attempted to evolve Angra beyond being a modest niche processor into a regulated fintech/crypto platform with broader strategic capability.

You can absolutely debate whether execution has been good enough, but quoting shrinking short-term profitability while ignoring the entire transition investment phase is simplistic.

Most regulated fintech buildouts look financially ugly during transition because:

compliance costs explode,

licensing/legal spend rises,

specialist hires are expensive,

infrastructure investment precedes monetisation,

and regulatory delays distort timelines.

And importantly: despite all the criticism, the market clearly still attributes optionality value to the assets, licences, crypto strategy and dispute outcomes — otherwise you would not see:

sustained multi-day turnover,

~169m shares traded,

repeated large buyers absorbing size,

and a repricing materially above the panic lows.

If Angra was simply a “destroyed worthless business,” the market would likely have abandoned it entirely rather than engaging in one of the most heavily contested speculative repricings the stock has seen in years.

So the real debate is not: “did costs rise?” Of course they did.

The debate is:

whether GST is building something strategically scalable that simply hasn’t matured yet, or

whether the investment cycle ultimately fails to produce sufficient return.

That’s a much more serious and balanced discussion than reducing a multi-year fintech transition into “they ruined a good little company.”

Not pursuing is just wishful thinking

Of course they will pursue chbs they were previously in talks about settlement.

Going back to arbitration so now they can go back to settlement talks.

Perhaps you should stop stalking our board kat?

I don't believe for one moment anyone including yourself believe anything you write or can take seriously.

1. You said the sp would be back at .2p by last Tuesday.

2. You said the placing would result in .1p

3. You said you would be back here once our RNS lands.

Which ever way you slice it the sp holding around these levels is a lot better than being in the .2p region. Any good news that's released could send us back to or over 1p much easier. :)

On a side note kat, I find it very distasteful that anyone who challenges you, you immediately revert to labelling them with misogyny labels as some type of in- built defence as you've done on several boards. You have created several title threads referring to me as a "massiveloser" does this some how give you the moral compass to be calling others out for inappropriate behaviour?

Unfortunately kat has a tendency doing just this. But in my experience she's quite often drastically wide of the mark.

Are you incapable of sticking to anything you post kat or is everything completely pointless?

"I'll come back and post about the reality of the situation when that rns drops..." Katstrangler

I think out of the blue we're going to bag :)

We've seen how fast this share can move now imagine what happens with some positive news? It's a coiled spring imo

You're right bfd.

Chaebol is a complete time waster not to be trusted!

Also, why do you keep posting up trading statements that nobody asked you for? It's completely outdated and irrelevant to the context of today. You claimed to have profited from shorting gst from above 1 pence. Where is this evidence? You redacted the last statement so there's no excuse for providing evidence of your short positions is there? Unless of course you're telling porkies. 🙄

I suspect you're going to be making many more failed predictions

How does it feel making those wrong predictions chaebol?

It's obvious he's lost his mojo

Do you recall asking this board name me one thing I've been wrong about?

1. .1p soon

2. Rise lasting the afternoon

3. Pump and dump

4. Goading billy for buying at .2p

And the rest