Member Info for MassiveRay

You’re now doing what a lot of entrenched bears do in microcaps — selectively framing every piece of tape data to support a conclusion you already decided beforehand.

Yes, the SINT cluster at 16:21:32 looked highly synthetic and fragmented. Nobody sensible disputes that. And yes, the repeated tiny 0.3999 prints clearly influenced optics around the displayed last price.

But you keep trying to present those observations as if they somehow erase the broader context of what actually traded during the move.

Over that period the market still absorbed:

repeated six and seven-figure share transactions,

substantial real turnover,

and a bid structure that repriced materially above the 0.20p area and stayed there for days.

If the move was purely fabricated by “4p props” and synthetic prints, the bid should have collapsed straight back once the alleged manipulation stopped. Instead the market continued trading materially above the old range even after your supposed “sorcery ended.”

And your own comparison actually weakens your argument: you point to Friday’s clean 4m buy as “real demand” because there were no SINT bursts or 4p prints surrounding it.

Exactly — which proves the market is capable of attracting genuine size independently of the cosmetic activity you obsess over.

So what the tape really shows is probably something much more nuanced:

real speculative/FOMO participation existed,

cosmetic microstructure tactics were also present in a thin market,

and both things coexisted during the repricing.

But repeatedly reducing everything to: “all fake demand” while ignoring the actual scale of liquidity traded and the sustained higher bid simply becomes another form of bias itself.

Another pointless stupid post from kat.

You remind me of the first-time gambler who catches a lucky streak early and suddenly thinks he’s cracked the system. Unfortunately that’s usually the point where the market humbles people hardest.

The irony is you keep talking about everyone else’s bias and certainty whilst presenting your own theories as established fact.

First it was:

“obvious manipulation,” then:

“obvious forward sold placing,” now:

“shares already dumped before an RNS.”

Yet we’re nearly two weeks on:

no placing RNS,

the bid is still materially above the 0.2p range,

and the market has traded substantial real volume during that period.

Funny how every new development somehow always gets bent back into the exact same pre-decided narrative.

Nobody is claiming GST is risk free or that management are flawless. It’s a highly speculative microcap with obvious risks.

But there’s a difference between analysing possibilities and trying to force certainty onto things that are still unconfirmed.

At some point you stop analysing the market and start trying to validate your own ego.

Have a lovely long weekend all. You too katstrangler, even though your weekends are probably not the best by a long strech. But try and go for a walk in the park in the sun and leave the boards alone until Tuesday. Its family and friends time, right kat? :)

As for chabol, he clearly has made himself look like i right turnip. And can't even read the tape without coming up with comical conspiracy theories.

If only that compulsive liar katstrangler would do what she says and stop talking rubbish..

'I'll post when an rns lands." So what is she doing ?

This certainly hasnt happend here.

Typically the sequence is:

Heavy volume day

Broker gauges institutional appetite / forward sells stock

Bookbuild happens after close

Placing RNS released either:

after market close (around 4:30–6:00pm UK time), or

7:00am next morning before the open

Its also very telling that for the first time chabol won't answer me. Very unlike him. Something has rattled his confidence.

If what chaebol states is true forward sold shares are completed then why no typical rns some 2 weeks later? This guy is talking nonsense.

Perhaps you will supply proof of forward sold shares? No chance!

I thought you had to "run" ?

So predictable Its funny.

You got to run so you better get off then that paddle board is waiting in the park

Chaebol is now relying on the 26th and pivoting away from his inaccurate sints thesis.

Bet*

If they dont become very clear are you not going to post here again? Let's have a better?

You heard it here first chabol has been getting lots of things wrong lately! And can never own up to his mistakes.

The fact chaebol has no answer about his SINTS nonsense is very clear he's an amateur at best.

Credibility shot to pieces ☺️

Yes chaebol. Give my regards to the folk in Lanarkshire in the woods. X

Sorry chaebol but you cant make silly bold statements about sints making a false market then look absolutely ridiculous and then pivot away from your amateurish read of the tape.