Member Info for MassiveRay

For a stock that supposedly had a “guaranteed death spike” and imminent doom, it’s still holding up relatively firmly so far.

The important point here is that the stay applications involving Semnet are coming from the defendants themselves. That’s significant because a stay application is generally procedural — it does not determine the underlying facts or merits of the case.

To me, that suggests the parties are at least trying to manage how the dispute proceeds, whether through arbitration, negotiation, settlement discussions or avoiding parallel proceedings.

Of course, nobody outside the room knows the exact strategy yet. But it certainly doesn’t align neatly with the “immediate disaster / guaranteed collapse” narrative that’s been repeated for months.

Markets often react positively when litigation risk starts looking more manageable or potentially containable, even before any formal outcome is announced

Perhaps duke fell for cbs AI

"He's reminds me of Michael Saylor"

Funny how every move up is automatically called “professional manipulation”, yet every time the stock refuses to collapse back to the lows the goalposts move again.

You’re describing possibilities, not certainties.

Yes, microcaps can raise money. Yes, low-float stocks can move violently. Yes, legal disputes cost money.

None of that proves this specific move is a coordinated “retail harvest”.

And the biggest contradiction in your whole thesis is this: if the company was supposedly on the brink of inevitable death exactly as you’ve described for 9 months, why has the market repeatedly found buyers willing to absorb millions of shares above the lows?

Markets are forward-looking. Sometimes they sniff out recovery before formal confirmation arrives. Sometimes they’re wrong. But calling every rally fake while dismissing all opposing views as “low IQ” isn’t analysis — it’s narrative anchoring.

You might still end up being right about dilution at some stage. AIM companies raise all the time. But there’s a huge difference between: “a raise is possible” and “this entire move is proven criminal manipulation”.

One is reasonable scepticism. The other is certainty dressed up as expertise.

Reality check.

Chaebol claims his position is short here.

1. He's been writing "snitching" letters to the fca

2. Writing to the bod posing as a genuine investor

3. Calling the recent rise a "pump and dump"

4. Posting his personal trading statement here dated several years ago.

5. Calling a raised is being worked through

I guess you have to decide if you believe he is genuine and not here so he can benefit from you selling your position.

Where is your evidence a raise is being worked on?

What that tape mainly shows is:

Repeated sizeable sells being absorbed without total price collapse.

Market makers holding a relatively firm quoted spread around 0.35 / 0.45 despite heavy supply.

Mixed flow: chunky sells, some decent buys, plus the usual meaningless tiny trades you see in illiquid AIM names.

The key point is this: if there was absolutely zero real demand, those 200k–1m share sells would likely have smashed the bid far harder and stayed there.

Instead, the market kept finding buyers around the mid-0.3s.

The tiny 10-share prints are mostly noise. People massively over-romanticise them on bulletin boards. They can be testing liquidity, automated fills, odd-lot matching, spread nudging, retail scraps, or MM housekeeping. On their own they prove nothing.

So the honest answer is:

It looks volatile and speculative.

It looks like a battle between sellers exiting and buyers stepping in.

It does not conclusively scream ‘criminal tape painting operation’ from that data alone.”

Whats the rush? Billy has asked you a question perhaps you can back up your earlier claims?

Your manipulation is being recorded chbs

Fact is Ray read the original post i made this morning, it confimrs big manipulation, if you cant see this is manipulation Ill be kinder and say to you you should go and learn what manipulation is. learn tape painting tiny, learn about buy the tiny buys after big sells, its all being manipulated.

Why is it anyone who pushes back you refer to them as having low IQ?

Quite funny how cbs has resorted to posting early hours before the market opens. Then runs for cover to take a view. A complete u - turn from his usual spamming posting style. Great to see something has rattled his usual theatrics.

Last question chbs are you busy today too?

😉

Also buddy how did your "snitching" letter fair with the FCA big man?

Is that why you rely on AI so much buddy?

I dont need to as the the long term holders here know about me. You on the other just talk rubbish with no evidence

Personally, I dont know when or if MICA is coming but I 100% know neither do you.

So post your short Mr confident

No chance of that happening. More than likely your last profit was seen many years ago. You don't make money at all is my guess.

So chaebol.

So you claim the sp is going to .1p if it doesn't after the "raise" do you promise to never post here again?

You talk rubbish everything you said especially recently has been completely wrong.

From the sint nonsense to the "pump & dump"

And then your short thet got wiped out :)