Member Info for Markshares

I don't understand the purpose of doing this - can someone explain? All future placings are not entitled to a cut if the company fails?

So hows your alleged buy at 0.3 doing, investor111? Or have u forgotten that claim along with the load of others in the past where you say you have just bought only to forget about it a day later

I am certainly sitting tight. There's every possibility Hvo Are useless at the business side of things in terms of selling or partnering for flu-v and ags, but even a fire sale, one would expect to be well above the entire mcap.

This is far from the usual dodgy AIM company with little history and struggling to make contracts, even the core business is turning around. Just have to put our faith in the executive chairman; Trevor seems on a personal level to be more trustworthy than a lot of creeps that run AIM companies, just a little bit of positivity from them once in a while wouldn't go amiss.

Just remember the small free float and how fast this moves on news and trust that because we are invested already, we will be the ones to benefit the most when news comes.

If you take a look back at other chat boards just before their company went to many multiples, they tend to look a lot like this - the quiet before the storm while people bicker of 1p falls and rises whilst every price they mention looks cheap in retrospect

To some extent I agree, today is a good example. I'm getting a current quote of 20 to buy any reasonable volume and about 18.5 to sell. Everything gone through today is over 20, but marked as a "sell" due to current spread. What I don't get is why each price today is very slightly lower than the previous trade(?)

Only thing I really believed/cared about in that interview is that Yoel Alemán is a good man to have on board. He's the only thing Ian seemed to talk with any heart about.

Directors Talk should be ashamed of themselves, never provide investigative journalism, just effectively asking the questions they been asked to ask. Could have pressed him on many things that actually MATTER to shareholders, instead just asking nonsense about the "verticals"

Ian Price should also be ashamed for calling himself a CEO but evidently just being a mouthpiece for whoever really pulls the strings here. I would shy away from any company who employs that useless lump in future. It's a bad reflection on him that he sat there on video saying with a smile "significant shareholder value in the news rich period that is coming", then making no comment at all on the collosal fall in share price, while Investor relations seem to refer to us with insulting names between themselves.

I just hope he has some sort of conscience to try and pull of some contracts for the seemingly forgotten PI here because my gut tells me he isn't a bad person, he's just been drawn in to something he is too small a man to handle in the "lead" position. Time to prove himself as the boss, not the puppet

I'm not invested here, but I see the constant RNS of XLM buying their own shares. Given it's a known that they are buying at around 60 and above, isn't it a no brainer to buy when it falls below 55 for example?

On days like this, open a spreadbet short the moment the news drops and recuperate your losses like that

I would hazard a guess that ~all of them were sold in the weeks prior to this.

They said the agreement is "legally binding" and they have said to keep us updated. Let's see how they do in that regard. I personally very much hope Ian DOES do an interview soon, so I can look in to that fukcers soul and see if I believe him.

I agree with calculated, the only positive is effectively saying the selling that has brought us here (from II) is confirmed done. I'm sure there will be a fair few who were waiting for confirmation on that. Better position financially is good too. The unsoecified delay to North Fork is an absolute joke and was the one thing we were all holding out for

So a placing at 0.33 explains everything, forward sold obviously and the reason why they couldn't comment on the fall because they knew exactly why it was happening.

Can IR be done for specifically lying about saying it was just panicked PIs?

Woodford has no interest in Eqtec, so why on earth are you here spouting this nonsense

Gumbo, why are you talking about Woodford?

Same, NT at IG, Could be a substantial background buy

No, I sold at a loss and remain with no shares, of course I would consider buying back if it falls enough. I'll probably wait my usual 3 days after a relatively poor RNS, to see where it goes

Sold out at 225, despite the open, I'm expecting a fall but we shall see

Looks to be opening slightly up, so what do I know

I'm glad this is my smallest holding as -34% EBITDA does not make pretty reading. Also, why is it so difficult to find a new warehouse?

Unbelievable to be called a c*** by the people who should be Fielding your queries. I would directly raise that with them, may be give them a piece of my mind on the phone too. Have they even apologised?