Weak RNS won't cut it8 Jul 2021 18:58
Yesterday's RNS, while conveying welcome news, failed to produce an immediate share price rise (have we got one today?). It's been a familiar pattern recently. How likely is it that Cenkos and Stifel are deliberately holding down the price while their clients, ie is funds and wealthy individuals accumulate? Maybe some of you L2 experts could enlighten me?
I know it sounds like a wild conspiracy theory but if MMs can manipulate LIBOR (which they did!), they can manipulate the share price of an AIM stock: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libor_scandal
Stifel certainly seem to have gone cold on this stock -- after apparently getting some US funds in. Though god knows there must be a plethora of funds that could be buying this in the US.
Given SEE management and staff have their share packages sorted now is there any conceivable advantage to them for the price staying at this level? I think not (but I may be wrong). Therefore, hopefully, we must be set for a big rise come the results.
Alternatively, the ****-up theory is that Seeing Machines (and their broker) don't know how to write an RNS that sends the price of a stock up. Imagine not putting a figure for potential worth of the market in yesterday's RNS!
What I find surprising is that so few analysts seem to cover this stock. Just 3 so far as I know; Cenkos (house broker), Stifel (house broker) and Panmure (independent). Would be great to get a few more covering this.