RE: Extensions1 Aug 2019 16:02
I would expect it has some protections in the contract but it does not specify it.
And remember, if APEC gets the operatorship of Barryroe they call the tune so what could it do with it? Sell it to CNOOC, for example, at a huge price uplift. That is what I would do. Furthermore, they also have the option of 59.2 Providence shares at 12p.
Issuance of Warrants to APEC
- Upon completion of the Drilling Programme, APEC will be able to subscribe for warrants over 59.2 million shares in Providence at a strike price of £0.12 per share (the “Warrants”).
- The Warrants, representing circa 9.9% of the current issued share capital of Providence, are exercisable for a period of 6 months following the completion of the Drilling Programme.
So EXOLA are in control up to the end of the drilling program and then APEC can either take over operatorship and take its warrants, do nothing, and rake in millions.
For example, if the value of Providence increases through "oil in the ground in Barryroe" and the share value goes to say $2 giving a value of $1.2billion which the Indians were one time mooted to have offered for Providence, that means APEC can get $120m value for the price of £7m on the whole of Providence, not just Barryroe. Now why would I not take my profit and then sell it on?
The obvious thing for APEC, who people believe is only a shell, is to sell out their interest in Barryroe and their 10% interest in Providence to CNOOC (Nexen). After all, if IOLAR is a success, Providence owns the block right next to it which is also rumoured to have billions of barrels.
My impression of O'Reilly and Providence is a farmer driving his herd of cattle down the road. One only does a huge sh*** in the middle of the road and sure enough O'Reilly walks straight into it. He seems to have an inexorable habit of putting his foot in it as this caper with the bank loan shows.