Member Info for maestro1

I also waitin for reply.

Nick

It was only 15m after sale and then another 10m after 12months. That wasnt worth as no reasonable divi would hav been given.

Nick

What were you last time?

Interested to know who hav changed their mind after the last vote?

Are you in the telegram group?
Anyone link to telegram group?

Last deal, 27% voted for the rubbish deal, further 24% will likely accept this deal. Taking it over 50%.

Last deal only 15m after disposal and then further 10m after 12 months. Another 50m in 5 years and then 3m every year after 2027 for 10 years. Amc would never hav got that nor i would hav waited that long.

Current deal 35m, closure, 1.8p a share divi and keep shares in amc..

But where are all the lth? Do they not post here..

Are they in telegram group?

Reasons for recommending the Disposal
The Directors believe that the Disposal is in the best interests of Shareholders for the following reasons:
• The Disposal price represents the most realistic means of Shareholders realising a return on their
investment and there is no present viable alternative likely to produce any value for Shareholders.
• The Disposal price represents a significant premium to Shareholders compared to the market
capitalisation of the Company and it has committed to pay a special dividend of 1.8 pence per
share to be paid to Shareholders within 90 days of Completion.
• In order to move Kun-Manie into a development and production phase, significant further
investment is required to be made by the Company including significant expenditure on
infrastructure and access roads. Given the worsening geopolitical environment, there is no
guarantee that Amur will be able to source and execute financing agreements to meet this
required spend.
• The Company will continue to be listed on AIM as a Rule 15 cash shell (subject to the restrictions
noted under ‘Future Strategy and Special Dividend”) which may provide enhanced opportunities
to create and deliver shareholder returns.
=========

Think very hard,

Patientpoor

To western company this asset was worth around 100m, but war happened, Sviblov will not sell but take it to production, he has the cash to do it.

Patiencepoor

You dont seem to get it, bigger companies are divesting from russia, bp, shell, haliburton etc there is no future for foreign companies.

There will be license requirements and no one will fund amc why cant ppl accept that. Also the russian govt will never allow sale of asset from western nation at fair price just to prove point to west..

Macdonald walked away and what did russia do with the shops they made russian equivalent.

Svidlov knows hes getting a great deal as he knows western companies will not able to get finance for the project most banks are sanctioned.

The russian govt may only accept the cut price offer for amc asset.

Husato

With regards to Kinross the government of russia refusef for it to be sold for $680m and stated a price of $340m.

katstrangler

only 22% of shares voted for the deal, most were they long termers, i think this time around the board along with the buyer will have the votes.

Lets see..

Tricky

"Halabja, Gerrad Bull, Sheffield Forge Masters. We know what had been sold to Saddam, we knew what he had used on his own people and during the Iran/Iraq war, we knew the capability he was trying to develop. In legal terms is caused probable cause.

I sleep fine."

So now we are making excuses for the british govt, that wasnt the reason given for war was it, we are not police of the world and the iraqis didnt ask us for help. You sleep well cos non of you family members were a casualty of war. Ask all those who lost loved ones and kids orphaned for a war they didnt want or ask for.

"Putin's approach is if you know there's going to be a fight throw the first punch. I guess you don't have a problem with Putin's philosophy?"

No i dont, because we all remember what we were taught about cuban missile crisis, US didnt allow Russian missiles so close to its territories, they were even prepared to use nukes. Why should Russia accept US missiles close to its borders? US has been funding dangerous biolabs in Ukraine, so again russia is justified in invading ukraine, we used the same excuse in Iraq but there were no dangeous bioweapons.

" If that's true why do so many people in these countries risk life and limb to get to the west?"

Very simple answer, we rape their countries, we destroy their countries, we steal their resources and countries have totally collapsed Syria, Libya, Yemen, Iraq, Afghanistan the list goes on. Why did many europeans emigrate to USA?

"Playing the race card is the last desperate attempt of the vaccuous."
You probably born in era where Britain had influence, now the only influence we have is by being a poodle to USa and do as they wish. When we in the west respect everyone as equals maybe then the world will be fairer.

TKOTM

anything under 1.8p is cheap, the egm is on 24th Aug, some will be selling who have purchased under 1p but imho proxies will be buying shares to get the votes. I think the resolution will pass and company sold

Tricky

See i dont buy that, we live in western country and im use to the statua quo. Likewise ppl in their countries are use to how they live. We cannot judge, there will alway be a minority in every country who dont like how their countries are run, that doesnt give us a right to invade them.

With regards to Gaddafi you didnt trust him, well have you considered the libyans trusting us. If we can have dangerous weapons then they can too.

The statement by you has a little racism in it implying we cant trust other nations but we can ours. Like we are above them..

Remember the iraq war where over 1m died on false pretence, you sleep fine with that. Now if libya did what he did he would have been called the new hitler.

So, if you want moral high ground dont have these weapons then others wont too.

"Nato is a defensive alliance" ok, when they bombed the f out of Libya was that defensive?

Listen, my point was Nato countries sanctioned Russia, the organisation itself didnt do it but nato was the reason why all countries in the treaty sanctioned russia.

You mentioned Japan they rely on west ok but the rest of the world still didnt sanction russia. Its a power grab going on the west are losing power and influence in the world.

Nato countries are western countries and they are the ones that sanctioned russia. The rest of the world didnt. So you get your facts state. All nato countries sanctioned russia.

Lololololololol

Who are nato? The whole west? Get that in your head mate..

BoldlyGo

You are right the war will not last forever but Nato stole russian foreign reserves and have put strong sanctions on them, these will not been withdrawn overnight.

Deep scares between nato and russia now. Putin could nationalise all western assets in russia and we can do nothing about it, the bit treaties and leverage is over. World will never be the same again.

Everyone is sayin the first deal is better, but there was no guarantee that the money would have been given in those periods. What if putin decides to fully close the taps in winter what will west do?

Candian kincross also had similar deal few months ago, 680m deal agreed but last month deal was reduced to 340m. Not much they could do, anything is better than nothing.

Its closure, amc ceo did an proactive interview last month where he said amc have limited options now and its gonna be tough.

Even when news article was stating an offer of 100m was put in directors wanted abit more, long term holders were still saying it was low, then war happened amc got screwed.

In current situation, amc lucky to get $35m.