Posted by Welloiled on the 12th June :-
Pt3
3.5. In the case of Article 53 of the Law of Georgia on Entrepreneurs, the registering body shall make decisions established by the Law of Georgia on Public Registry on the issues determined by this Law.
3.6. The legal and procedural issues of the Register of Entrepreneurs and Non-Entrepreneurial (Non-Commercial) Legal Entities shall be determined by the Registration of “Entrepreneurs and Non-Entrepreneurial (Non-Commercial) Legal Entities” approved by the Order N241 of the Minister of Justice of Georgia of December 31, 2009.
3.7. Pursuant to Article 18 of this Instruction, the Agency shall make a decision on the registration (satisfaction of the request) if there are no grounds for establishing a defect, registration of the production termination or refusal to register.
3.8. In accordance with the above-mentioned rules, the body registering in the decision-making process shall be obliged to make a full, accurate, comprehensive examination of the circumstances of the case and the obligation to make a decision on the basis of their mutual agreement.
4. Conclusion
4.1 As a result of the mutual agreement of the factual circumstances of the case and the requirements of the legislation, the registration body considers that the documents submitted by the interested person do not meet the conditions of registration.
4.2. In order to protect the principle of publicity in the field of public administration, the National Agency of Public Registry,
4.2.1. Stop registration proceedings.
4.2.2. 30 calendar days to eliminate the established defect.
4.2.3. The authorized person shall additionally submit the registration documents of the amendment drawn up and certified in accordance with the rules provided by the legislation.
4.2.4. In the case of failure to provide information confirming the elimination of the information or document, a decision will be made to terminate the registration proceedings.
4.2.5. The fee paid for the service is not subject to refunds in case of making decisions.
4.2.6. The decision shall enter into force upon publication
The decision may be appealed within 30 calendar days after its publication to the Public Registry and the National Agency (Tbilisi, N2, Coastal Street) and only by a further court order.
Posted by Welloiled on the 12th June :-
Pt2
According to the same contract, the transfer of any rights and obligations by the parties shall be carried out with prior written consent by the State.
In addition, on April 18 and 19, 2019 is represented by "Frontera Eastern Georgia" LTD (JSC 204905674) a 50% stake in the partner JSC "Georgian Oil and Gas Corporation" (JSC) 206237491) letters (180188/17 and 184042/17), according to which Frontera Risors Georgia Corporation and LTD "Frontera Risors yu." E-Mail (JSC Georgian Oil and Gas Corporation) (JSC 206237491) sent a written notification on April 15, 2019 and "Frontera Risorsi Georgia" LTD "Frontera Risorsiz Yu." e-mails for the transfer of shares. As explained in these letters, the notification was not attached to any documents that confirmed that Frontera Risorsiz Yu. E-Mail has a financial and technical opportunity to fulfil the obligations under the contract and Frontera Risorsiz Yu. Ltd. The e-mail agrees to the terms of the contract and fulfil their performance.
Thus, since written consent by the state is not represented, the 2/2/2 National Agency of NAPR file:///tmp/tomcat8-tomcat8-tmp/1e12bcd4-3282-4873-a27c-e08424c81152.html 2/2 of the Public Registry shall not be deprived of the possibility of whether the party fulfilled the obligations provided for by the agreement on the oil distribution and processing plant study of products. According to the above mention, B19044710 is an amendment to the requested equity participation change (204905674) LTD.
3. Legal justification for issuing an act
3.1. In line with Article 51(2) of the Law of Georgia on Entrepreneurs, the basis for changes in registered data of the enterprise is the basis for changes in the registered person/body of an authorised person/body in the proper manner of the authorised person/body or a transaction compiled by authorised persons in the manner determined by the legislation of Georgia.
3.5. Pursuant to Article 53 of the Law of Georgia on Entrepreneurs, the registering body makes decisions on this issue, defined by the law and its competencies, defined by the Law on the Public Registry.3.2. In accordance with Article 327(1) of the Civil Code of Georgia, "the agreement shall be deemed as concluded if the parties agreed on all its essential terms in the form provided for by law.
In accordance with Article 53 of the same Code Ex, "there is no deal unless any outlandish expression nor any other circumstances can accurately determine the contents of the transaction. 3.3. In accordance with article 5 of the General Administrative Code of Georgia, an administrative body may not have any action against the requirements of the legislation.
3.4. In accordance with Article 96 of the same Code, "an administrative body shall be obliged to investigate all circumstances of the case and make a decision on the basis of the assessment and mutual reconciliation of these circumstances.
Posted by Welloiled on the 12th June :-
RE: 1474799B19044710 djvu file
Mole, the letter dated 14/06/19 addresses the file B19044710/5 as follows:
Pt1
The decision on the suspension of registration proceedings by the National Agency of Registration (17/05/2019 16:59:10) The National Agency for Registration Proceedings received by the National Agency for Registration proceedings B19044710 16/04/2019 17:58:36 ( applicant: Giorgi Janiashvili/01025015919/), with which the registration of amendments to the registered data of the subject is requested. Legal Form: Limited Liability Company Identification Code: 204905674
1. Established factual circumstances
1.1. Registration of changes in the registered data, namely the change of the partner, by the interested person in the registered data of Frontera Istern Georgia Ltd (S / N 204905674).
1.2. In order to register the change, an additional application is submitted, the documents certifying the registration of Kopan Yi and the \"Frontier Rissors Georgia Corporation\" and the LLC \"Frontera\" Risorsiz U.S. The agreement between El-CC, according to which Frontera International Georgia LLC (204905674) owns a 50% stake, Frontera Research Georgia Corporation has transferred its share to Ltd. \"Frontera Rissoriz U.S. LC \".
1.3. On April 18 and 19, 2019 is represented by 50% of the 50% shareholder of The Frontera Eastern Georgia LTD (JSC 204905674) a share holder of the Partner JSC "Georgian Oil and Gas Corporation" (S/n 206237491) letters (180188/17 and 184042/17), according to which Frontera Risorsiz Georgia Corporation and LTD "Frontera Risors yu." On April 15, 2019, a written notification by JSC "Georgian Oil and Gas Corporation" (S/N 206237491) and "Frontera Risors Georgia Corporation" LTD, Frontera Risorsiz Yu. was e-mailed for the transfer of shares. As explained in these letters, the notification was not attached to any documents that confirmed that Frontera Risorsiz Yu. has a financial and technical opportunity to fulfil the obligations under the contract and Frontera Risorsiz Yu. Ltd. The e-mail agrees to the terms of the contract and fulfil their performance.
2. Legal assessment
2.1. The documentation submitted by Sareg does not comply with the requirements of the current legislation, in particular, in order to register the change, it is additionally presented to Frontera Rissors Georgia Corporation and Frontera Rissoriz Ltd. The agreement between LC, according to which the owner of 50% of the shares of Frontera Eastern Georgia Ltd (S / N 204905674), Frontera Rirsors Georgia Corporation has handed over its share of "Frontera Risorsiz Yu." The contract between "Saksalovano" and Frontera Risors Georgia Corporation, which includes the registration body, shall fulfil the terms and conditions and conditions stipulated in the transfer of all rights and obligations.
Posted by R8pilot on the 12th June :-
As many alluded to last night, it appears TW and his gang posted the arb doc on here. It gave him the safety of it already being in the ‘public domain’ to avoid any legal action for posting it on SP, which was coincidentally within 24 hours. Strange who helped with the posting of the link and continued to push their agenda, but more importantly how they got it. It smells of coordinated attack. I still doubt whether all of the doc is legit as it could easily be doctored by a legal professional in the weeks / months after the arb conclusion had been written up. If the GG were so confident that they were following due process then they would have just waited until mid July. The balls now in Zaza’s court so let’s see his next shot.
GLA
Posted by Aurora1 on the 12th June :-
R8 I agree with that. The thing for me is WHY ? what have they to gain from this if the share is dead. For me there are 3 options
1. They have an unhealthy relationship with dark forces in GG
2. The Shorts are just frozen and they still need all of us to sell if (big if) it relists
3. Both
Posted by Chris572 on the 12th June :-
US congressmen call Ivanishvili "Putin's ally"
https://m.vz.ru/news/2020/6/11/1044459.html
June 11, 2020, 10:41
eleven
Photo: Yi Gaochao / Global Look Press
Thirteen American congressmen made a statement on the “involvement of the richest man in Georgia,” the leader of the ruling “Georgian Dream” Bidzina Ivanishvili, in “destabilization in Georgia in favor of Russia” and called him “close ally” of President Vladimir Putin, the newspaper VZGLYAD reports in Tbilisi.
The Georgian opposition enthusiastically comments on this position expressed several months before the parliamentary elections to be held in October.
One of the leaders of “European Georgia” Sergi Kapanadze called this statement of the congressmen “a sentence”, noting that the leader of the ruling party was called the “conductor of Russian interests in Georgia”.
“The position of our strategic partners, the Americans, shows that Bidzina Ivanishvili is leading the country to collapse,” said the opposition leader, who expressed hope that the opposition would win the election.
The ruling party has not yet commented on this statement, but supporters of the “Georgian Dream” on social networks sharply criticize these congressmen, calling them lobbyists of the American companies Frontera Resources and Conti Group, who lost their jobs in Georgia.
In the social networks of American congressmen called on "to deal with the problems of their own country" and considered their position in relation to Georgia "shameful."
Posted by Looed on the 12th June :-
Proposal on how to use the Fund
I just emailed Puddy and hopefully we soon get a system in place so we can use the Fund (now GBP2,422) and give transparency.
I don't think it's practical that we ask the Board for the OK each and every time we want something done. I have also been thinking of a quick way to get a majority view on things for when we do need to discuss / vote on something.
We have no idea what the volume of work will be or when it might start. So I have tried to accommodate as many options as possible. Each case might be unique so these are general proposals, possibly overthought.
Instead of asking "Are we OK with this?" every time and have everyone reply and clog up the board, I will send a brief proposal message i.e. "Do we want to use the fund to help welloiled translate documents", (I know he doesn't thus far). I will then send a "recommend this post if you agree" and another post where you can disagree. If anyone wants to make a comment they can reply in the original proposal post.
Majority vote wins though 'losers' can always make an appeal if they feel passionately about something. If we have multiple dissenting views on an issue then maybe we will need an arbitration panel of our own who can have final say on the issue.
As we may have 1 or more members lurking in the background with ulterior motives, if any vote looks dodgy - maybe we vote No to something that should be an easy Yes - we might do a roll call and count votes that way (unlikely but we never know)
Voting will be open for a full 24 hour cycle based on UK time. Anyone can make a proposal to get things rolling.
I think we should "pre-approve" the translation of the following -
1- Any media that's spoken, not text based, so everything from TV through to Youtube. We can get the translator to leave out the parts non-FRR related and equally include comments from GOGC etc that are present but we couldn't identify them.
2- What seems to be new / major newspaper interview or reporting. Though we might end up with something close to a Google Translate version, it will hopefully take out the ambiguity.
3- Typically, after a major news site release, the article will be shared, rebranded and reformatted across multiple platforms. We can collect these, Google Translate them to see if they are just repeats or if they are taking the story in a different direction. I propose we translate the "different direction" articles as they may contain new information.
Unless someone can provide cheaper quotes we will use upwork.com (US$110 vs US$456) and we will see how pricing on our future projects go. Transparency is easy on that site. I should be able to invite an overseer to join any project so they can see all discussions and payment details.
If we have multiple projects on the go I will keep a work sheet updated and post it here as needed.
Posted by Looed on the 12th June :-
Lots of (non-PDF) news this morning
Its still early but I cant see anything PDF related
Lots of warm soundbites in the following article, i.e. "... Ambassador Degnan said the two countries undoubtedly remain strong strategic partners. "I know that the US is looking for ways to work with Georgia and we will continue to take many initiatives with the country, because we believe in future and success of Georgia", Ambassador Degnan said.""
https://agenda.ge/en/news/2020/1841
Fallout from the letter from the 13 Congreemen. This "low level document" has generated some high level reactions
Irakli Kobakhidze terms report of American congressmen as "low-ranking document” and 13 congressmen as "lobbyists of the National Movement"
https://www.interpressnews.ge/en/article/107860-irakli-kobakhidze-terms-report-of-american-congressmen-as-low-ranking-document-and-13-congressmen-as-lobbyists-of-the-national-movement
"Gia Volski on U.S congressmen’s report: I think that one of the sentences in the document is a result of a well-organized, aggressive lobbyism" (Volski is First Deputy Speaker)
https://www.interpressnews.ge/en/article/107863-gia-volski-on-us-congressmens-report-i-think-that-one-of-the-sentences-in-the-document-is-a-result-of-a-well-organized-aggressive-lobbyism
"Foreign Minister says document signed by "very respectable Republicans" has no any political force"
https://www.interpressnews.ge/en/article/107862-foreign-minister-says-document-signed-by-very-respectable-republicans-has-no-any-political-force
Russia also has a CV-spin on its relations with Georgia.
"Russia urges Georgia to make use of cooperation experience during pandemic"
https://tass.com/politics/1166969
And, just to annoy the GD even more -
"Saakashvili calls on Georgian opposition to unite before elections"
https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/saakashvili-calls-on-georgian-opposition-to-unite-before-elections.html
Posted by Moleinahole on the 12th June :-
RE: 1474799B19044710 djvu file
Well-oiled this is the evidence I was looking at a few weeks ago. I thought there was a full English version there plus the Georgian notorised copies. It's FRR reply to the original block of the transfer which has subsequently been rolled into the arbitration. It has been the ambivalent end to registration process that has made it hard to work out where the asset resided. Assuming Hogan Lovell comments on this are correct it is the unravelling of that transfer that adds to the problem of the termination notice. It's a key piece of evidence in the trail you are reading but it will now have been superceded by the arbitration rulings on the transfer.
So Ekxoc it is consistent with what we know the position was pre-arbitration.
The question as I posted earlier is what happens if the transfer is voided and FRCC is in liquidation.
The convergence of the two pieces of litigation around the transfer question is very problematic. And the possibility Outrider/FTI have been working with the GG can't be ruled out here.
Posted by Zibrahimovic on the 11th June :-
This is the circle I can't square SR. You yourself posted the link that some posters on here then referenced as being genuine in their opinion and posted text from the document on here. Hence you and them put it in the public domain. Others such as my self Wazza Earsbern LL urged caution as it hadn't been officially sanctioned but you all carried on ranting at us who erred on the cautious side. Then today you all back track and report your own posts to get them removed, but by then the damage was done. The feel good of just giving gone.
TW posting the document is equally as dangerous. You pulled your posts for fear of retribution so went then champion it again after he putsxit on his website?
Its bizarre behaviour. No I
Posted by bugsy-b on the 11th June :-
Spot the difference
"Natia Turnava - Review of contract with Gazprom serves to reduce price, price will be reduced by about 15 percent
16:45, 26.05.2020.... Gazproms gas to Georgia reduced by 15% on 26th May 2020...
https://1tv.ge/news/natia-turnava-gazpromtan-kontraqtis-gadakhedva-fasis-daklebas-emsakhureba-daakhloebit-15-procentit-khdeba-fasis-kleba/
"Gazprom says price of natural gas for Georgia to remain unchanged
OIL&GAS
30 May 2020 09:09 (UTC+04:00).. No it aint says Gazprom on May 30th 2020 ....
https://en.trend.az/business/energy/3245781.html
Posted by Welloiled on the 11th June :-
Pt5
witness:
Ivatsi Imnadze (born on 13.08.1975, personal account 01008003153, reg. Address:
"Georgia, Tbilisi, Mikheil Tamarashvili Avenue, X 11,
Bitsa 41)
Tsotariu Bachana Shengelia LEPL Civil. Registry. Agency. electronic
The identity of the cleaner is checked through the database, and the ability to
"Authorities and the authenticity of the sticking test were checked online.
By interviewing the applicant. A notarial deed is also checked by a notary.
Identity of disciples with their identity documents,
Their validity has also been verified.
All notarial acts (including witnesses) by Tsotarius
The parties and the witness were notified of the circumstances that precluded the witness
It was stated that there are no circumstances excluding witnessing. Online.
After a visual observation, the witness confirmed the identity of the "applicant"
I further dictated this to the “applicant” in the presence of the signatory and the witness.
T; .
statement
Present, I, Zaza Mamulaishvili, as Frontera International Georgia Ltd.
(204905674) General Director, Frontera International Georgia Ltd (204905674)
I declare on behalf of him that he will participate in the public registry
Requested by the application submitted to the National Agency on 16/04/2019 # 819044710
Registration for change of share participation, in particular: April 13, 2010 Ltd.
50% shareholder of Frontera Istern Georgia "Frontera Research Georgia"
Corporation ”donated its share to Frontera Risors% U.S. El-C ", chapter
An affiliated person; Accordingly, 50% of the shares of Frontera International Georgia Ltd.
The owner must specify “Frontera Risors% U.S. LCD. "
The text of this statement was written by Tsotarius b. Shengelia, who is direct
Read to the applicant in a comic mode. The applicant. Confirmed that statement
The text is fully consistent with its writing and that it is not present in any form when the statement is made
Under the psychological pressure of a physical person and to sign a statement to replace him,
He entrusts the right to “the signatory person, while attending the writing action -
This statement is a copy of the previous three editions.
One of them is kept in the writing archive of Tsotarius Bachana Shengelia of Georgia, and.
“Two will be handed over to the side.
The fee for notarial services is paid in total: 61.00. GEL, of which: 50.00 GEL, agree:
“Article 32 of the Government of Georgia Division, VAT; 9.00 GEL according to Georgia
'Article 169 of the Tax Code, 2.00 GEL in the electronic notarial register.
Fee for registration of action, according to the above-mentioned allocation of the government (29.
December 2011, distribution XM507) Article 39.
Posted by Welloiled on the 11th June :-
Pt4
In his letters, the recipient of the contract is not required to do anything.
Submit such evidence, especially if the recipient is a shareholder.
Affiliated person.
). Given all of the above, since the transfer of shares
Article 27.3 of the contract between the "affiliated persons" was implemented
Accordingly, paragraph 2.I of the decision of the Public Registry is not required
In the last sentence, the “pre-written state” is mentioned
Consent ”or submission of any additional evidence.
I “Lr 1> = - 3>>
Ga ... a little bit
However, the end of the legal assessment of the decision.
The paragraph reads: “Requested by LI 819044710
Ltd. is registered to register the change of share participation
Consent of Frontera International Georgia (SN 204905674). We do not agree
This assessment, as there is no requirement for such consent
Prerequisite in current legislation or contract; Regardless.
At least this is presented by Frontera International Georgia Ltd (S / N)
204905674) consent as well as the above decision
Is required in the paragraph (see Appendix).
T.
Given all of the above, please consider the present.
The statement and the documentation attached to it are indicated in the decision
To eliminate deficiencies, renew the regulatory proceedings and implement them
Requested in the registration records of Frontera International Georgia Ltd.
Make changes.
"Frontera Rissoriz U.S. On behalf of LC:
Janirshvili
On behalf of Frontera Riverside Georgia Corporation:
Ro, “R-% 2
Director
P7N
P8-50 ENG+TRANS+NOT
P51 NEXT
Notary. Individual number of validity:
31560976820119
Georgia
PAGES 51-53
Name of the notarial act.
Through direct electronic communication
Confirmation of the received application
Notarial Number of Registration
N190597640
"Registration date
27.05.2019
Notary: Bachana Shengelia.
Address: st. Tbilisi, 13 Paliashvili Street
Phone: 243 11 46
Information on notarial acts and notarial deeds (its creation, change.
And / or cancellation) you can get notarized Georgian receipts.
On the Chamber's website: VIVIVI.I0 L8 (V.06 You can also call: +995 (32) 2.
661918
Georgia.
notary act.
May 27, two thousand nine hundred and nineteen:
Georgian Tsotarius Bachatsa Shengelia.
Writing bureau located at: st. Tbilisi, %. Paliashvili st. # 13.
I was contacted directly using electronic means of communication
"Applicant". He said he wanted to make Tsotarius conifers online.
Announce and notarize. (Rules for performing written actions
About the instruction - Article 62, paragraph 4).
Applicant:
% Aza Mamulaishvili (born on 08.08.1964, personal registration number 01024002412,
Passport number: 18 / + # 27538, reg. hers. Tbilisi Kkekelishi st. # 5)
Signatory person;
Giorgi Jatsiashvili (born 25.11.1984, personal registration number 01025015919, reg.
hers. Tbilisi M. Tamarashvili Ave. X 13 k b. 15).
Posted by Welloiled on the 11th June :-
Pt3
Proof that "Frontera Riverside Georgia Corporation"
(Transmitter) and “Frontera Risorsiz Jues. They are the recipients of the e-mail
"Affiliates" according to the above definition of the contract,
Here are the following documents (see Appendices): Frontera.
Rorsors Georgia Corporation's Certificate of Shares (Shares)
On ownership, and the company Frontera Rissoriz U.S. E-mail
Addition of C ”to M1. These documents state that.
At the time of concluding the transfer agreement (April 13, 2019)
Frontera Research Corporation is a Frontera company
Riverside Jues. Direct owner of 100% of the shares of LC.
(Shareholder) and the company Frontera Research Georgia Corporation
100% share indirect owner (shareholder), i.e. it. The last
Two companies are "affiliated individuals".
Given the circumstances under which the transfer agreement was entered into
Among "affiliated persons", any factual and legal.
Lacks the basis for financial and technical capabilities.
Request for confirmation documentation. Transfer agreement.
"It is not a legal result of technical support and.
The source of funding (change, as it provides.
The parent company is Frontera Riverside Corporation, which.
It is unchanged. However, there is no doubt that the operating company.
Frontera International Georgia is a non-profit society.
Which is designed and operated solely for the purposes of the contract.
Thus, we conclude that it is unchanged as technical
3
Opportunities as well as a source of funding and there is no such thing
Request and submission of confirmation documents
Obligation / Necessity, as Frontera Riverside Corporation
I. successfully and deliberately carries out the contract until the first day
Investments.
10 As for other corporate statements.
For the corporation on 15.04.2019. Sent to an affiliate
A copy of the notification about the transfer (see Appendix), in which uniquely.
Fixed:
"Please accept this letter as a message.
That (contact | according to Article 27, 2019
On April 13, the contractor. Handed over to the contractor) his.
100% of the shares and in the operating company or Ltd.
In Frontera International Georgia) for its respective share
"Property rights" Frontera Rissoriz U.S. LC
S, which is the limited liability of Texas
Company, Contactor's Affiliated Person (emphasis added)
And 100% of Frontera Resources Corporation.
"A subsidiary.
I contract | According to Article 27, “Frontera Risorsiz
Jues. The LCP is present and warranted
Gives that: (a) He owns the technical and financial
Sh. Ssh, 's Miss Mi Sra; Charged
: And i ss and s
With a section | Sat; Forward; A. Asa.
Promise ”(emphasis added).
S. Thus, “Frontera Rissoriz U.S. For the corporation by LC
The requirements set out in the contract by sending the notice in full.
Satisfied. As for “to confirm the above
"Submission of any documentation," as the corporation put it.
In his letters, the recipient o
Posted by Welloiled on the 11th June :-
Pt2
Zheokh / R # .1-6 1 f- # 7409
The National Agency of Public Registry is deprived of the opportunity.
Investigate whether the party complied with the contract or not!
Obligations ”(see paragraph 1 of paragraph 2-1 of Decision 2)
Sentence) (emphasis ours). This is a wrong conclusion, since it is not.
Is based on the provisions of the contract.
In particular, the parties to the transfer agreement “Frontera Rissoriz Jues.
LC (Receiver) and Frontera Riverside Georgia Corporation
(Transmitter) are "affiliated persons" who are represented in the program.
The agreement repeatedly states that the corporation
No claims and no expressions. By the party for his rights and.
Transfer of liabilities to an affiliated person. Regulated
Article 27.3 of the contract, which establishes (see Annex):
2732 The contracting party is excluded from the contract
Based on his rights, obligations V and
Completely or partially other contractor of interests
Transfer to a party or affiliate
?; JSC or pre-oil (a! I)
Without written consent V | emphasis is ours, if.
The contractor will send a message about the transfer of the boiler.
Notification and any such affiliated person: (a).
Possesses technical and financial ability to perform
His contractual obligations; And. (B)
Recognizes and assumes all the provisions of the contract
Provision and condition.
Subsequently, Article 27.10 of the contract sets out (see Appendix):
2710 Any originating from the present contact
Transfer of rights, debts and interests
Must be accompanied by an operating company (ie, Frontera Ltd.)
In "Eastern Georgia") for the equivalent amount
Transfer of right (-.IL
Thus, during the transfer to the "affiliated person" the state
No prior written consent is required. Such consent.
Required during the transfer to a non-affiliated third party,
Which is regulated by Article 27.2 of the contract and which is given.
The case does not apply at all.
The term "affiliated person" is defined in Article 12 of the Contract
As follows (see Appendix):
"Affiliated Company" or "Affiliated Person" means:
A. to the Company in respect of the Contracting Parties
A corporation, partnership, or other legal entity,
In which:
H “Contracting Party? Owns, directly or
Indirect share or vote «right
Fifty percent (50%) or
Otherwise has the right to determine
Governance policy;
At least fifty shares of Pia shares
3 s. Or
Ro! BS, P .;
Indirectly. Share of the "contracting party" or
Fifty percent of the right to vote (50%)
More or less; A
Cross its mm: bit.
Chkhazagmas is ours);
Posted by Welloiled on the 11th June :-
1474799B19044710 djvu file
This is the translation of the relevant pages of the 55 page 1474799B19044710 djvu file. In light of recent events I’m not sure if this has any value but having spent time and effort on it, I might as well post it as it involves the transfer of shares in FEGL from FRGC to FRUS. The pages in between these extracts are either Georgian translations of the English text or are statements by a notary confirming the accuracy of the translation. I haven’t edited the translation so any incomprehensible text may be due to the quality of the scanned documents and the ability of the OCR software to recognise it and/or the google translation.
Pt1
PAGES 2-5
June 14, 2019
"The Ministry of Justice of Georgia.
LEPL National Agency of Public Registry
statement
(LEPL National Agency of Public Registry # 819044710/5 Regarding the decision).
LL m / s May 17 LEPL National Agency of Public Registry (hereinafter.
Public Registry) issued Decision # 819044710/5 (hereinafter referred to as the “Register”)
"Decision"), according to which the registration proceedings were suspended.
And the applicant was given 30 days to rectify the defect.
2 It is mentioned in the decision that JSC applied to the public register
Georgian Oil and Gas Corporation (hereinafter.
"Corporation") its! April 18, 2019 And 19.04.2019. M # 180188 / I7 and
184042 / I7 with the letters of the corporation Frontera Rissoriz
Jues. He is against handing over the shares to LC. The reason for this,
As it is clear from the decision, the corporation names the following: (a).
"Frontera Rissoriz U.S. Granted to Corporation by LC.
The message was not accompanied by any documents.
Would confirm that “Frontera Rissoriz U.S. LC has it
Financial and technical feasibility provided by the contract
"To fulfill obligations"; (B) “Frontera Rissoriz U.S. E-mail
The "message" to the corporation was not accompanied by anything
A document confirming that “Frontera Risorsiz Yus.
LC agrees with the interest given to him
Conditions stipulated in the contract and fulfills their fulfillment. "
The corporation uses the above statements in its letters
Contract with the state is the share of the product
On distribution (hereinafter referred to as the 'contract').
F Unfortunately, the public registry shared it without appeal and without verification
The above statements of the corporation by which to some extent it
Was misled. As a result, the public registry was misdiagnosed
In its legal assessment, the following: (a) “According to Contract II,
The parties must transfer all rights and obligations
To be carried out with the prior written consent of the state. "
(See last sentence of paragraph 2.1 of the decision); And, (b) / -7. A
There is no written consent from the state,
Posted by Moleinahole on the 11th June :-
RE: Re-reading the Zaza translation
Steve V - the point you are making is a very good question. Jonathon I think Steve V is looking beyond the arbitration debate to what happens now. Given FRR have or are in the process of relinquishing does that mean the 1 % is safe or in other words he is asking if there is a period to fix/cure a material breach.
That is indeed the question and why anyone writing it off totally even now needs to be slightly careful. Couple of scenarios here - they can indeed fix the breach and still retain the 1% or they can't and GG persist - the fact there has been a material breach means they are at the mercy of the GG and it matters not whether they fix it or not. Hence my comment that this is likely a political/economic decision either way as I tend towards the view that we are at the mercy of the GG now.
After 2 years of litigation and constant skirmishing since GD came into office goodwill is likely short. If they had a genuine opportunity to resolve outside arbitration then they should have. And that is the same comment I'd apply to the Outrider legals. Frontera have found themselves surrounded by litigation and attempted to counter punch on each of them that seems to be the American way.
Posted by OneDayRodney1 on the 11th June :-
RE: TW & EkXoc
It's really beyond me why some on here seem to question StarRage's motives or behaviour or (perceived fantasy imo) alliances. It's almost as if some are in denial and by attacking someone who, although can post in a condescending manner, makes a more informed and reasoned contribution to this board than most.
The real issue is the arbitration findings and the really perilous place that leaves us all. It seems we now need a miracle alas.
Posted by Madpunter on the 11th June :-
RE: TW
I noticed you started a new thread, it wasn't to hide the fact that you'd just posted 'TW is that he is a foul mouthed oaf who is in no way a paragon of virtue' minutes before you're referenced by TW. I don't recall you criticising TW anytime prior to today. Strange timing!
Posted by StarRage on the 11th June :-
It was a new thread because it was a new topic. I'm assuming TW read the message board quickly, saw my comments and toaties' and then confused his message with mine. No idea why you guys just don't look for the simple and obvious explanations rather than concoct bizarre theories because I annoy you.
Posted by Jonathansxx on the 11th June :-
RE: TW & EkXoc
So who gave it to Kaiser?
Posted by Madpunter on the 11th June :-
Jonathansxx - I wonder if it could be the same person who first published about the arbitration in April 2018. If it was maybe they needed to get it leaked by someone else before 'obtaining' and reporting on the leaked document's posting.
Posted by StarRage on the 11th June :-
Explosive: the Legal document showing how Frontera Resources defrauded investors for years & the chatroom morons threatening me with violence for exposing it
The judgement which I publish in full below from the International Arbitration Court is damning and for those such as scumbag PR advisers Yellow Jersey, the ***** blogger Malcolm Graham Wood and Nomad Cairn which, for years, helped the, formerly AIM listed, FRAUD Frontera Resources (FRR) to raise million of pounds from mug punters, it is document demonstrating their wholesale moral bankruptcy. For those involved continued to push the shares even AFTER I had shown the company to be a fraud run by liars.
The tribunal ruled on claims brought by the Georgian State oil company against Frontera. In places, the judgement is comical showing Frontera's bosses claiming to be talking to Georgia's PM who they say is onside, a sheer fantasy. But the final conclusion, a 70% win for the claimants is damning. For that means that claims that Frontera was making via RNS over many years to pump the shares, are now shown to be, without doubt, lies.
I called this out as a fraud run by liars many times as you can see HERE.
Frontera's advisers attacked or encouraged others to attack critics such as myself and - as they earned vast fees - helped push a narrative of lies to pump the stock and get more share issuances away. Issuing shares based on lies is fraud. Some folks, notably at Yellow Jersey PR and the ***** blogger himself, need to think long and hard about what they did to promote this fraud to investors who probably had a limited underrstanding of this sector.
Some of those investors, who ignored my warnings as they thought they knew better than a trained oil analyst with almost 30 years experience of writing about oil shares, may still hate me for what I wrote or be in denial about their loss. I suggest their anger is misdirected and in due course might be refocussed on the actual fraudsters and those who enabled this fraud.
I note on the LSE Bulletin Board one such loon, Star rage, has just posted:
"cheers srat that still dosent change my opinion of TW he is still a rat and scum in my mind why does he gloat when companies are having a hard time i have over £70,000 in here and if i lose it all so be it but TW i dont think he has one cent in here and yet he still gloats and wants to see this fail to hell with all the decent shareholders most of whom have put there live savings into this me well if this goes tits up i will just go out and make my money back of my building bussines not that i need it though just a thursday morning rambling from me."
Meanwhile "toatie" adds:
"If TW or any of his crewe post these docs they should be reported to admin and banned for life low life rats thats all that they are dont get angry very often but if he was here in Scotland i would Probably pay him a visit that he wouldnt forget in a hurry."
Ends.
Posted by StarRage on the 11th June :-
Pretty sure TW will post the document fairly shortly anyway.
Posted by EkXoc on the 11th June :-
SR your knowledge and respect for TW is evident. However this is clearly not just a commercial venture and has not been since Ivanvillis mob took power. What is also very evident is that should FRR fail to bring in western interests, loosening the grip from the east and generating a hansome income for the GG and with any luck the people of Georgia, then the block will clearly fall into the hands of a Russian major who will be given something close to exclusive product rights and profits effectively dooming the Georgian people to poverty and totalitarianism with a good chance of violent civil unrest to follow. I am sure this has not escaped TWs notice. So either he is in league with the government in some form perhaps being a tool to leak documents and a convient method to access the western media, or else he just doesn't care. Either way not deserving the respect of any decent person. I hardly portray FRR as the white knight in all this however there are clearly benefits to the Georgian people as a whole in what they propose, something worth fighting for.
Posted by StarRage on the 11th June :-
I'd be interested to see your proof of that, but I won't hold my breath.
EkXoc, my opinion on TW is that he is a foul mouthed oaf who is in no way a paragon of virtue, but that it is wise to pay attention if he advises subscribers to short a stock on the basis that he seems to have information before it is in the general public. As an example, he called both MRS and MYSQ as scams long before they were exposed as such. Not saying he gets everything right but is worth reviewing your stock if he is reporting red flags.
TW & EkXoc
Your 15 minutes is here.
https://www.s h a r e p r o p h e t s.com/views/49441/tom-winnifrith-in-the-pay-of-the-russian-oligarchs-shocker
Remove the spaces from the url
kaisersuzae, errazel's mate has posted it on ADVFN. He's also said he's sent TW a copy so will be interesting if he publishes it.
Well, as if by magic he has, so guess we can all discuss it again. Made me laugh that he called me a loon after getting me mixed up with toatie.
Posted by Looed on the 11th June :-
Proposal - Probably a quite dramatic one
The following is not in any way intended to prevent anyones right to say or post whatever they choose.
As we know, the publishing of the PDF was a leak. We can only wonder why we have been targeted. Some of us have read it, some have chosen to stay well away, a few have cut and pasted a few bits to illustrate various points.
As said by many, it is possible the report and our cutting and pasting - limited though that has been - could be a way to get the details out into the open and we take the blame for that.
I have two proposals
1- We no longer cut and paste from the PDF. We can continue to discuss any and all aspects of the PDF but we don't back it up with parts of the document - that way its just us summarising and theorising. Think of it as "doing a Zaza"
2- The link to the document was probably live for about 12 hours and overnight in UK (i think) so it might not have been picked up by the other boards, they can only take what we are posting - maybe they cannot access the file if its only been shared here.
3- Which leads to my dramatic proposal. To the few posters who cut and pasted the PDF - how would you feel about having those specific posts reported and we try to have them taken down. We can still talk about them, just remove the direct link that might be used outside of our chats. Not meant to insult anyone or question anyones motives - just think its safer if anything directly from the PDF is removed. Not trying to stop any discussion about the PDF itself.
4- If we report a post what happens - its just removed without any consequence to the poster?
5- I would only report a poster who agrees with the motivation and is happy for us to try and have the specific post removed, and is also comfortable that there would be no further action taken outside of a post removal. No chance of a ban etc.
6- If anyone agrees (and I will understand if no one does) can you make your self known and advise the time of your post. I will report it and let you know once its done)
I am really not trying to pressure anyone - just trying to prevent us potentially shooting ourselves in the foot.
Follow the stocks
that matter to you
Create a free LSE account to:
Already a member? Log in
Create Free Account