Member Info for Madpunter

Always made me smile that phrase. Lenin called the Labour Party 'useful idiots' and they still supported him lol!

'Turkey's voting for Christmas' also sums them up well lol!

If this was written as fiction, it would be dismissed as too far fetched. It's only reality that can get away with such blatant lies. I think it was Hitler who said that the bigger the lie, the easier it was to convince people.

Quady - Did you pay attention to what happened at their last meeting. They arrived in their private jets and thrashed out major oil deals before the conference started. They then agreed on how they should get us all to reduce our Carbon footprint, before they jetted home in the HUNDREDS of PRIVATE PLANES! They're taking you for a mug. Wake up and smell the coffee!

Next Quady will tell us 2030 target was just an estimate, like the 15°C average temperature of the World was just an estimate.

WEF Agenda 2021 changed to Agenda 2030.

2030 EU ban of new cars with ICE changed to 2035.

Scotland's 2030 target cancelled.

UK's target next?

Quady - I'm still waiting on whether you think all those people were deluded or principled?

No funding Quady? Did the money for the research come from 'Labour's magic money tree?'

If it screams out fake news you'd better contact the court in Finland and tell them Dr Aseem Malhotra has been lying under oath.

The same numbskull who sold our Gold reserves off at $278/oz (it was over six times higher a few years later) started taxing our pensions. Our pension system was the envy of the West until that point and now there's a huge hole, hence the opening of the floodgates. It doesn't detract from the point that the 50% increase from the initial projected figures from the early noughties to 2030, will result in 50% more pollution etc.

The figures are for 2030, not the current figure.

Quady - There's lots of research programmes in Cardiology fields at Oxford. Show the proof that there's no funding that could be withdrawn.

The population increase from 56m to 75m + is almost 45%. The initial projected drop from 56m to around 54m is a decline of just under 5%. That's a swing of 50% or 50% more than the initial projection prior to the influx of immigration.

WoodyB - I agree, but real environmental issues don't count only the MMGW scam. Controlling immigration could have reduced the population and hence pollution etc by 50%. Yet the.LibLabCon are all aligned on illegal immigration, plus even the Green Party.

Quady - IMHO this doesn't imply funding for research at Oxford into the COVID jab, but funding in general, as the research councils are all top heavy with industrialists with vested interests. George Monbiot wrote about this power of the multinationals in 'Captive State: The Corporate Takeover of Britain' and on many occasions in the Guardian.

It's the staffing issues which are the problem, creating a stressful workplace and a feeling of entitlement. Labour closed the cottage hospitals and estimated a 5% reduction in the UK population from 56m to 54m by 2030. Then they opened the floodgates to immigration and now we're heading for 74m+ or around a 45% gain. That's a swing of 50%, but we don't have 50% more frontline NHS employees or beds. There was one newspaper in the early noughties where they were articles about closing a secondary school due to pupil numbers declining and spending £16m on a new Midwifery Unit due to a boom in the birthrate in the same city.

Tesla - 80k Doctors, nurses and other NHS workers you suggest refused the COVID jab in the hope of catching COVID to get 10 days off work.

I see you have no respect for people working for the NHS.

Quady - I haven't stated that funding has been withdrawn. I have repeatedly asked you to explain why 80k NHS workers would risk their jobs and why Dr Aseem Malhotra, Dr John Campbell and Prof. John Ioannidis would risk their jobs and reputations? Plus why would Andrew Bridgen MP turn down promotion for expulsion from the Tory party just to tell the facts about the COVID jab? Are all these people deluded or principled.

It's not one expert, it's many, plus 80k NHS worker's who if not experts, are in contact with experts and also working in a relevant industry.

Fomad - The most cited medical researcher has much to lose by questioning the safety of the COVID jab, but little to gain. Those paid or funded by the pharmaceutical industry are already gaining by siding with the industry.

The second part refers to Dr Aseem Malhotra, Prof. John Ioannidis and Dr John Campbell.

Quady - You keep quoting and agreeing with those who gain financially. You haven't answered why 80k NHS workers would risk their jobs for no apparent benefit, assuming you're right and the jab was safe? Also, what is to be gained by those medical professionals who query the safety of the jab? They risk their jobs and reputations for no benefit. Why? Why did Andrew Bridgen turn down reward for expulsion of the Tory Party. All these people are risking jobs, reputation and financial security for nothing. Are they all deluded or principled?

Dr Aseem Malhotra references the Stephen Hawking of Medicine, Prof. John Ioannidis, from Stanford University, who's the most cited medical researcher in the World and a mathematical genius. He published a paper in 2006 entitled,'Why most published research findings are false. The greater the financial interest in a given field, the less likely the research findings are to be true.'

Aseem Malhotra speaks highly of vaccination, but not for the COVID vaccines.