Member Info for LWHL

Are the buy backs still going? Does not seem to have been an update since a few days ago on that front.

As to seeking 230p: bit greedy :) GLA.

Apparently the average retail 'investor' holds a stock for about 4 weeks (or maybe six weeks, cannot remember the specifics of the quote I read now).

Anyway, that theory would tally with potential sales around the 90p mark here, where perhaps some got out around break even or so from initial buys 4-6 weeks ago, on the way down to the 78.80 low print. Which was hopefully the bottom!

The cup and handle prospect remains valid right now. Fingers crossed we regain some positive momentum tomorrow and into next week. GLA.

The chart does look good, for the first time in a while.

It would be nice to have a decision to make, in terms of my initial target exit price. Something that I considered conservative at the time, and certainly a price that I did not still expect to be waiting for :)

Well, this is not the first time this has seen a pump on essentially nothing that I can see. Going on past performance. It is either that, or a leak IMO.

Either would of course stink, but this is AIM, so maybe think about taking some profits would be my advice to myself, were I still in this one.

But I am not and equally not advising anyone here to do anything beyond consider the potential reasons for this rise and the lack of company updates to underpin such activity in the past few days (and especially today, given the volume as well).

But as always, I wish good luck to holders, because ultimately you either win or you lose and everything else is simply noise.

Do tell.

I actually took a small profit here on the way back down to the low 90's.

Would have made a better return had I approached it as a trade rather than an investment from the start. The high 90's were clearly not going to hold. Should have dumped the stock then.

Anyway, I am looking at this with fresh eyes again. And the lack of inside buying is not encouraging me to buy back in, even around these prices.

I have a new potential entry target price and if it hits, I will look to trade it some of the way back up.

If however this is the bottom then I hope you all do well here.

Hopefully no less than the last final dividend was. Cannot see it being more, but the yield as it currently stands is satisfactory to my mind.

A decent enough payment for the equity risk, while we wait for better times for this name. Fingers crossed naturally!

Fingers crossed, it is holding up well today, considering it is ex-div now.

Yeah, I think confirming the specifics of the dividend and the dates will offer a floor now.

So I do not think my lower orders will trigger. Not sure we are going to see much of a bounce in the run up to ex div either though, so might be a bit of no mans land for the time being.

Which is fine. Disappointed with the lack of inside buying personally, but my thesis and plans are unchanged from the other day, so will simply sit tight and hopefully not have to wait too long for the target exit price. But under no time pressures, so all good. GLA.

Sure...but so what?

This is all well and good, but this is a listed company.

It requires funds. Either through shareholders, or via external income.

Just to keep going, let alone to reach a point where shareholders start to see a return on their investment.

That is why the lack of any new deals since I cannot remember when, is so crucial here. Everything right now IMO hinges on Stal payment.

They have been in 'business' for so many years now and still have nothing financially tangible to show for it.

But that is just my take on it and time will tell, either way, sooner or later. GLA.

Conservatives in name only. Completely and utterly compromised, having implemented a raft of policies that were obviously decided by (unelected and unaccountable) supranational organisations.

That does not, to the best of my knowledge, include the various gambling sin tax stuff, but it certainly fits within the big state interference bucket. Hence why some feel that we are living through times of a uniparty.

Anyone who still thinks that the Tories are a small state, individual responsibility etc party, are quite frankly fools.

A bid now would be most unwelcome. I doubt it would be for much more than 15p, if even that, and I think we can all agree that we are not here for that kind of number.

Assuming they can even get that type of corporate activity away.

But perhaps we are doing them a disservice...let's see if we get a flurry of director purchase RNS's later today. Big money, not chicken feed buys.

After all, if you were so confident of the future of the business, why would you not look to 10X, 100X etc your money? Lol.

To be clear, not advice in either direction. Buy, sell, or hold at your own hand. Everyone must own whatever decision they come to.

A less diplomatic post than mine, but nothing that I can dispute.

So, the cash runway is not into 2026, as some thought it was.

End of 2025 means they need to raise again in early Q2 at the very latest IMO. Preferably Q1.

It is like groundhog day with this lot, to my mind.

Ah well, GLA.

Well, one of my buy orders is around 207p. 200p is a psychological number only, but round numbers do seem to have an impact, even if they are rarely based on technicals.

185p-ish is the only strong support level that I can see on the chart though from where we currently are.

I would be surprised if we saw that low. Maybe if the wider markets wet the bed.

Subject to the obvious caveats, I would likely be quite a heavy buyer if that range hit.

Anyway, the stock market Gods will show us their intentions soon enough! GLA.

We will all probably get the chance. Gut feeling was right this time. Unpleasant closing price.

But all good, as long as you are not playing on margin :) GLA.

I took a few more recently. 234-ish. Still for a trade and still a small overall position.

No bounce yet, so would be (pleasantly) surprised if we do not see another red day tomorrow. But these things do not always follow the same pattern, so we will see soon enough.

IMO this is fairly cheap on fundamentals now, even allowing for all the justified caution.

Will post again if those other orders hit down the line. GLA.

JG and Pokerchips: you both make some fair points and I agree the sale is not just down to the CEO.

But he does have a material role to play in the negotiations, as with all the other high level aspects of managing the overall business.

Which is why he gets paid handsomely. And why the buck stops with him - same as every other outfit, be it listed, or a private entity.

We need to see a bumper sale of the North American bus service, before you can claim credit for the faith in the CEO, Pokerchips :)

Like everyone, I am pleased to see the SP around 80% up from the lows, but many of the criticisms were entirely justified.

If the BOD can redeem themselves, then we all win. Jury is still out though right now IMO.