Member Info for LWHL

I cannot see the TA play that takes us to 5p right now BTW, but that does not mean it is not there, or even so, that we might not have such a run up, regardless.

Because a 10 plus bagger is not that uncommon in the nano cap space (although catching it is a different matter, lol).

Especially for names that capture the imagination. This might be one of them - right place, right time etc - but as always, time will tell and I have no idea if it will progress accordingly.

I have a few quid here in the hope it does, and so far, have been impressed with how they have gone about their business in these early stages, and the regular updates, but not an amount of money that would hurt if it does not.

You pays your money etc. GLA.

I do not think TA works very effectively on tiddler stocks, but putting that aside for now and just for fun...if that is a bull flag in progress, then a move above 1p would be the short term target. When exactly? My TA skills are not good enough to offer you a reasonable timeline.

2p looks like very strong resistance beyond that, and of course you likely have further resistance points before then in the range of 1.2, 1.5 and 1.8p, IMO.

Any decent technicians here are more than welcome to challenge this view :) GLA.

Likewise mate. We clearly disagree on many political matters, but so what?

Anyway, got some US stocks to do some work on, so TTFN and GLA.

Agree there is usually an inter-generational tension in any society. That is where western and non-western nations have more in common than not!

But I think immigration is a topic where there is more agreement than disagreement between the older and younger adult cohorts. Certainly today, if not perhaps 30 years ago or so. And for the most part, it really is not down to bigotry.

Not that it matters anymore, because everyone has pretty much made up their mind now and the cards will fall where they will.

But I disagree that it was young people who wanted these 'woke/progressive/XYZ' style of remakes. The ratings and revenues generated from so many of these things would show otherwise, if they had appealed to their target markets.

It smacks of internal corporate politics IMO.

I wonder if they did not want it put in an RNS, but did not consider the duties of our BOD to do so, in light of the media speculation?

Had it not been for said media comment, it might have been different perhaps? Rightly or wrongly. Not commenting on that theoretical scenario.

See if we get another RNS of our own which may age this post badly, but for me at the time of print, nothing has changed. GLA.

Pokerchips: Which nation has done otherwise? In relation to your first statement.

From what I have seen or read, it is only a handful of western nations that have ever experimented with whatever type of policy this is. Including 'positive' discrimination, which is something that future generations will scratch their heads over, IMO. Those tribes/nations that survive, anyway.

Take your point on the word 'woke'. It goes by many different names. 'Progressive' I dislike, because it suggests something false - that this is superior to the old ways. Others have connotations that if used in a public setting, might now fall foul of recent legislation.

What they all have in common though, is often doing the opposite of the perfectly reasonable sentiment that they claim to represent.

Be kind. Respect other viewpoints. Tolerance. All very 1984 IMO. Ministry of love. Of peace etc.

Assuming you have just read the same article as me, lse, it is interesting how your take on this is different to mine.

I do not think it reflects poorly on MS, but agree an RNS is likely to be forthcoming on the topic shortly. As it should.

The investment case here remains unchanged IMO and I do not think that this will be the last we hear of potential M&A activity either, but time will tell and just my thoughts, nothing more. GLA.

I embrace innovation. What supporter of free speech and capitalism does not?

I do not believe that many of these types of adverts were created in the spirit of growing their business. IMO some feel like a proxy for government messaging.

Or in the case of some of these ones, their billionaire owners probably want to look 'on point' and trendy with their friends. I bet we can all think of a few companies in this mould.

Not sure if there are/have been various (western) government subsidies or similar financial incentives to do this woke stuff. That would not surprise me either. At least it would fit within the category of fiduciary duty on the part of BODs, I guess.

Unlike so many big charities, at least with private sector entities, the consumer does indeed have the ability to be the dog that wags the tail, rather than the other way around. As it should be.

It is simply a refreshing change from the standard advertising method/narrative of the past few years, Pokerchips.

PC/woke presentations that IMO most people found distasteful or unappealing - but would not dare voice these opinions, in case they be compared to a well-known historical German socialist :)

Overton Window...come on, my son! Lol.

Sounds very similar to what I did and for the same reasons.

Albeit, I took the loss a while ago when I finally stopped being willing to overlook the track record.

But it is shareholders like you who I wish well, and who I hope get something back for the faith, the financial risk and the opportunity cost.

Which government institutions merit any praise? A DOGE that actually does what it says on the tin, if ever such a department gets established here, perhaps.

Otherwise, they all offer about the same level of social and economic return on investment, so to speak.

I still think outfits like this should never have had to go through this. And I believe the amount of compensation owed should be zero.

But politics and face-saving looks like resulting in what amounts to a de facto special tax levied instead.

Just as I anticipated would happen right back at the start of this shake down. Hey ho. GLA.

Sorry to hear that, Jimbolina. Did you at least manage to slice a few profits on the journey up back then, or did you HODL?

Exactly my thoughts, Tatty. And how much the increase in revenues this might yield will be gobbled up by Stephen? Lol.

Hopefully she tells Bud to do one. They made their bed, lol.

Anyway, I am hoping for another doom-laden post from lse shortly, so I can get ready to add a few more here :)

I have a theory as to what is happening with the volume of, and SP levels in, the past few days or so. Will be interesting to see if it is right or not.

Either way, as I think I said previously, IMO this is not just PI's buying up institutional unloading of stock.

Fingers crossed we have at long last found that bottom here, but we need to break out of that downward channel first IMO. GLA.

Splendid. The bears will shout that it is only a LOI - which is fair enough - but even a LOI is not something that any old Tom, Dick and Harry can get with any company.

This is IMO the most impressive update we have had so far. A long way to go, but a good start to the journey so far! GLA.

I completely agree. A refreshing change from the usual tiddler outfit, that only does marketing when they are about to get the begging bowl out...then once they have filled the coffers, revert to radio silence.

It is another small tick in the box, IMO. GLA.

Why don't you write to investor relations and ask them?

I am not necessarily disagreeing with you by the way. It just seems like too big an oversight to not have been previously considered and rejected, for whatever reason.

More importantly for me, where are the inside buys? Especially from the CEO.

She has been given the top job in an established cash machine of a business, not some fledgling or struggling entity.

Hopefully if the next update fails to deliver, the key decision makers will get in someone who can perform.

A brief (and healthy) pull back, before a continued climb to that gap fill above?

Looks like I am not the only one who took a few of the sub 2 quid ones off the table today, just in case it is retrace time.

Still on the fence as to whether to trade out here or give the CEO a bit more time. Decisions, decisions! GLA.

Yeah. I like the look of that website as well.

Proof in the pudding still to be tasted of course, for the resident critic here, lol, but a nice little extra piece in the jigsaw IMO. GLA.

No need to worry about the impact the dividend might have on the SP.

This is still in its juggernaut phase. Long may it continue :) GLA.